Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BAJRANG DAGDU CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR BEED AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's representations within twelve weeks, thereby disposing of the writ petition.

Summary

Petitioner Bajrang Dagdu Chaudhari filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition raised representations dated 27 February 2026 and 2 March 2026 which remained pending. The Court allowed a correction of the nomenclature of Respondent No. 2 and, after hearing, directed Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner’s representations within twelve weeks of receipt of the order. No substantive merits of the representations were addressed. The order disposes of the writ petition with the specified direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's pending representations within a specified time period

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • court direction
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37817-DB


                                                   {1}                   43-wp-9631-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     43 WRIT PETITION NO. 9631 OF 2026

                                     Bajrang Dagdu Chaudhari
                                              VERSUS
                 The State Of Maharashtra Through Its District Collector Beed And
                                               Others
                                                  ...
              Mr. A.R. Muley, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. N.D. Batule, AGP for State
              Mr. Rajendra D. Sanap, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       Leave to correct nomenclature of Respondent No. 2. Correction

              be carried out during the course of the day.

              2.       The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to

              decide the representations of the Petitioner dated 27.02.2026 and

              02.03.2026 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of

              copy of this order.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.