Bombay High Court
SAMBHAJI VITTHALRAO SONWANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The State must decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within four weeks of receiving the Court’s order.
Summary
The petitioners, Sambhaji Vitthalrao Sonwane and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief concerning a representation they had submitted on 30 July 2026. The petition was characterized as an innocuous prayer. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, ordered the second respondent (the State) to consider the petitioners' representation on its merits. The Court directed that the decision on the representation be communicated within four weeks of receipt of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any substantive order beyond the directive to the respondent.
Issues considered
- The Court needed to determine whether the State, as respondent No.2, must adjudicate the petitioners' representation dated 30 July 2026.
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative law
- innocuous prayer
- court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37857-DB
1 47-WP-9637-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9637 OF 2026
SAMBHAJI VITTHALRAO SONWANE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Shrimant R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. Since innocuous prayer is pressed into service by the
petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated
30/07/2026, on it’s own merit, within a period of four weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…