Bombay High Court
GURUNATH NAMDEV CHOPDEKAR AND ANRversusRAJENDRA NAMDEV CHOPDEKAR AND 5 ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed of
Holding
The High Court quashed the impugned execution order and remitted the case to the Civil Judge for execution in accordance with the surveyor’s report and plan.
Summary
The petitioners challenged the Civil Judge Junior Division, Pernem's order accepting a Commissioner’s report and plan for executing a decree concerning land in Survey No.115/0. The High Court appointed Mr. Vivek G. Naik as surveyor to demarcate the property using total station methods, referencing the 1979 deed of sale. The surveyor submitted his report and plan on 2 August 2026, which the parties accepted as correct. The Court partially allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order, and remitted the matter to the Civil Judge for execution in accordance with the survey report. The writ petition was thereafter disposed.
Issues considered
- What is the correctness of the Civil Judge’s order accepting the Commissioner’s report and plan for execution of the decree?
- Whether the High Court can set aside the execution order and remand the matter for execution based on a newly prepared survey report?
Subjects
- writ petition
- execution of decree
- surveyor appointment
- property demarcation
- Civil Procedure Code
- High Court jurisdiction
- quash order
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1898
903 WP 965 2026
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.965 OF 2026
GURUNATH NAMDEV CHOPDEKAR AND ANR ... PETITIONERS
Versus
RAJENDRA NAMDEV CHOPDEKAR AND 5
ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Ryan Menezes and Ms M. Silva, Advocates for Petitioners.
Mr Kabir Sabnis, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 24th September, 2026
P.C.:
1. The present writ petition takes exception to order dated
12th November 2025 passed by Civil Judge Junior Division,
Pernem, in Regular Execution Application No.1/2018 whereby
Commissioner's report and plan at Exhibit D-11 were accepted for
execution of decree.
2. On 15th December 2025, notices were issued in this writ
petition. On appearance of parties, the matter was taken up for
consideration on 16th February 2026. Parties showed agreement to
appoint Mr Vivek G. Naik as Surveyor, who shall conduct the
survey of portion of land under Survey No.115/0 of Village
Pernem by using Total Station Survey Method. Surveyor was to
consider boundaries of property specified in Deed of Sale dated
Page 1 of 2
24th September, 2026
903 WP 965 2026
10th May 1979 along with survey plan. Surveyor was to demarcate
all structures and their dimensions existing at the site. In pursuance
to aforesaid order, the surveyor has executed the assignment and
submitted a report dated 2nd August 2026 along with plan.
3. Learned Advocate appearing for respective parties
principally accepts the correctness of plan showing plot Nos.1, 2,
3, and 4 in Survey No.115/1 situated at Querim Village. In that
view of matter, only exercise of putting the parties into possession
by fixing boundaries as per plan remains.
4. In that view of matter, writ petition is partly allowed. The
impugned order is quashed and set aside. Parties are relegated back
to Civil Judge Junior Division, Pernem/Executing Court for
finalizing execution proceedings in terms of report along with plan
tendered by Surveyor to this Court. Survey report along with
annexures thereto be transmitted to the Executing Court, and
parties shall proceed further to demarcate the property as per the
plan appended to survey/site inspection report submitted by Mr
Vivek G. Naik.
5. Writ Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH
Designation: Private Secretary
Page 2 of 2
Date: 24/09/2026 13:56:37
24th September, 2026
Checking your session…