Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MADHAVRAO HANMANTRAO PATIL TAKLIKARversusTHE DEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER LATUR AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of as such, with a direction to the Deputy Charity Commissioner to decide the pending Change Report expeditiously.

Summary

Petitioner Madhavrao Hanmantrao Patil Taklikar filed a writ petition challenging the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Latur's delay in deciding a pending Change Report. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Patil, sought to withdraw the petition, citing a desire for the Commissioner to decide the report promptly. The Court considered the procedural propriety of allowing a petition to be withdrawn at the petitioner's request. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The Court ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn and directed the Deputy Charity Commissioner to decide the pending Change Report as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request during the hearing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • administrative law
  • charity commissioner
  • expeditious decision

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42708
                                                 1                         946-WP-9674-2026.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 946 WRIT PETITION NO. 9674 OF 2026

                               Madhavrao Hanmantrao Patil Taklikar
                                               VERSUS
                       The Deputy Charity Commissioner Latur And Another
                                                   ...
             Mr.Patil N.P. Jamalpurkar (Thr. V.C.) for the Petitioner.
             Ms.Vaishali Chaudhari, AGP for the Respondent/State.
             Mr.R.N.Dhorde, Senior Advocate i/by Mr.V.R. Dhorde for Respondent
             No.2.
                                                   ...
                                   CORAM          : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
                                     DATE            : 16.09.2026
             PER COURT :


             1.              Heard the learned Advocate, Mr. Patil, appearing for the

             Petitioner through video conferencing. After arguing the matter for some

             time, the learned Advocate submits, on instructions, he seeks to withdraw

             the present Writ Petition. He, however, requests that appropriate

             directions be issued to the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Latur, to decide

             the pending Change Report as expeditiously as possible.

             2.              In view of the request made by the learned Advocate for the

             Petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn.

             3.              The Deputy Charity Commissioner, Latur, is requested to

             decide the pending Change Report, in accordance with law, as

             expeditiously as possible.


                                                         [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ]

             Sunny Thote


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.