Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIKRAM S/O ANIL PAWARversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THR. ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Vikram filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought a pass‑over to take instructions. Subsequently, the petitioner decided to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition at the stage of hearing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Union of India
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                     904-WP-971-2026-(C).odt



          Digitally signed
          by SUNNY
SUNNY     ANKUSHRAO
ANKUSHRAO THOTE
THOTE     Date:
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          2026.01.29
          10:41:22 +0530

                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 971 OF 2026

                             Vikram s/o Anil Pawar                                ...Petitioner
                                  Versus
                             The Union of India & Ors.                            ...Respondents


                             Mr. Vipul Dada Patil a/w Ms. Shubha Shirsat i/by Mr. Amol G. Kale,
                             Advocate for the Petitioner.
                             Adv. Y.S. Bhate a/w Mr. Ajinkya Jaibhave, Advocate for the
                             Respondent/UOI.


                                                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
                                                                        &
                                                                  ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

                                                           DATE         : 28th JANUARY, 2026

                             P.C. :-

                             1.            This matter was heard for some time. The learned

                             Advocate for the Petitioner sought a pass-over to take instructions.



                             2.            After the matter was called out for the second time, the

                             learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on instructions, that the

                             Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.




                             SUNNY THOTE                       1 of 2
                                                      904-WP-971-2026-(C).odt




3.            In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off

as withdrawn, on instructions.




(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                  (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)




SUNNY THOTE                       2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.