Bombay High Court
SUHAS VECHYA NAIK AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitions were held infructuous and disposed of because the petitioners' elected terms had ended.
Summary
The petitioners, Suhas Vechya Naik and others, and Ganesh Rupsing Paradke and another, were elected members whose terms expired in 2024. They filed writ petitions (Nos. 9723/2023 and 9667/2023) challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitions remained maintainable after the petitioners' tenure had ended. It held that the termination of their elected terms removed their locus standi to pursue the reliefs sought. Consequently, the Court declared the petitions infructuous and disposed of them.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- elected members
- locus standi
- termination of term
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38264
9723.2023WP+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
39 WRIT PETITION NO. 9723 OF 2023
SUHAS VECHYA NAIK AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY
COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 9667 OF 2023
GANESH RUPSING PARADKE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY
COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Syed G.R.
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.J. Salgare
Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr. Warma B.R.
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 24.08.2026
P.C. :
1. Writ Petition No.9667 of 2023 not on board. On
being mentioned, taken on board.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that
the term of the petitioners as elected members has come to
an end in the year 2024 and the petitions have become
infructuous.
3. In view of the same, the petitions stand disposed
of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…