Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JIJA MATA MAHILA BACHAT GAT WADALI DIGAR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BHARTI SUDHAKAR PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner acknowledged that the cause of action no longer exists.

Summary

The petitioner, Jija Mata Mahila Bachat Gat Wadali Digar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel later informed the court that the cause of action had become infructuous. The court accepted this statement, finding no remaining issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of on the ground that it was infructuous. No further orders or directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous due to the petitioner’s admission that the cause of action no longer exists

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • high court
  • petition dismissed
  • cause of action

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41547


                          IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              955 WRIT PETITION NO. 9784 OF 2022

            Jija Mata Mahila Bachat Gat Wadali Digar Through Its President Bharti
                                         Sudhakar Patil
                                            VERSUS
                  The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
                                               ...
                    Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pokale Dnyaneshwar B.
                        AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. D. B. Bhange
                      Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. S. D. Hiwrekar
                                               ...

                                  CORAM      : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
                                  Dated      : September 09, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.       The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the

           cause in the present petition is rendered infructuous.



           2.       Accepting the statement, the Writ Petition is disposed of as

           infructuous.



                                                             ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. )




           vj gawade/-.




                                              Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.