Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHISH GORDHAN TAHILRAMANIversusJENNY ELIZABETH HYATT AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the petition to be withdrawn and disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashish Gordhan Tahilramani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but the underlying family court proceeding had been dismissed for default. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently applied to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered the request to withdraw the petition in light of the dismissal by the family court. After hearing both sides, the judge permitted the withdrawal of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was withdrawn and all pending applications were disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition after the family court dismissed the matter for default

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • family court dismissal
  • default judgment
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                                                             82-WP-9913-2025 (C).doc

                             N.S.Kamble


                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 9913 OF 2025

                             Ashish Gordhan Tahilramani                   ...Petitioner
                             VERSUS
                             Jenny Elizabeth Hyatt And Anr                ...Respondents
                             ____________________________________________________________
                             Mr.Shivendra Dwivedi a/w Mr.Siddhesh Borkar, for the Petitioner.
NILAM
          Digitally signed
          by NILAM
          SANTOSH
                             Mr.Himanshu Maratkar (Through V.C) a/w Mr.Utsav Chandora, for
SANTOSH
KAMBLE
          KAMBLE
          Date: 2026.08.25
          12:12:38 +0530
                             Respondent No.1.
                             ____________________________________________________________
                                                                 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                 DATE           : 24th AUGUST 2026

                             P.C. :

                             .              Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for

                             Respondent No.1.

                             2.             The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw

                             this Petition as proceeding before the Family Court has dismissed for default.

                             3.             Considering the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner,

                             the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

                             4.             All pending Applications are disposed of.



                                                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.