Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNIL TUKARAM BODKHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Collector must decide the representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receiving the Court’s order.

Summary

Sunil Tukaram Bodkhe filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Collector regarding a representation filed on 1 June 2026 by him and the villagers of Taklibhan. The petitioner sought a judicial directive compelling the Collector to consider the representation and pass a decision on its merits. The Court examined whether the administrative authority had a duty to adjudicate the representation within a reasonable time. Finding no substantive hearing had taken place, the Court concluded that the Collector must act promptly. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of by ordering the Collector to decide the representation within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Collector is obligated to decide the representation of the petitioners and the villagers of Taklibhan village filed on 1 June 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • local governance
  • direction to authority

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39621-DB


                                                   {1}
                                                                            19 sr.no..odt

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 9919 OF 2026
                                         Sunil Tukaram Bodkhe
                                                                            ….Petitioner
                                                VERSUS

                  The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Secretary And Others
                                                                     …..Respondent
                                                   …..
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.
              AGP for Respondents: Ms. N. B. Kamble.



                                           CORAM : N.B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                                            DATE : 31 AUGUST, 2026.


              P.C.:-

                             The writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent
              No.5 - Collector, to decide the representation of the petitioners and
              villagers of village Taklibhan, dated 1.6.2026, if not already decided, on
              its own merits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of
              this order.




               [ABASAHEB D. SHINDE]                        [N.B. SURYAWANSHI]
                   JUDGE                                         JUDGE


              grt/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.