Bombay High Court
SONALI RAM SHRIRAMEversusMAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CO LTD THR ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioners' representations on caste validity within four weeks and issue a reasoned speaking order, keeping all contentions open.
Summary
The petitioners Yogesh Bansode and Sonali Ram Shrirame filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging the refusal of Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. to accept their caste validity certificates. They had submitted representations on 4 June 2026 and 9 June 2026 after the Caste Scrutiny Committee had sanctioned their validity. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of Maharashtra and counsel, contended that the matter was administrative and not amenable to judicial intervention. The Court examined whether the petitioners were entitled to a reasoned decision on their representations under principles of natural justice. It held that the respondents must decide the representations within four weeks of receipt of the order and issue a reasoned speaking order, keeping all contentions of the petitioners open. Accordingly, both writ petitions were disposed of with directions to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondent is required to decide the petitioners' representations on caste validity within a reasonable time
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to a reasoned order under natural justice
- Whether the writ petitions can be dismissed without such a decision
Subjects
- writ petition
- caste validity
- natural justice
- reasoned order
- Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co.
- High Court
- representation
- Caste Scrutiny Committee
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37381-DB
1 70-72.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
70 WRIT PETITION NO. 9947 OF 2026
MR. YOGESH SHIVSHANKAR BANSODE
VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CO. LTD.
THROUGH ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondents/State
...
72 WRIT PETITION NO. 9949 OF 2026
MS. SONALI RAM SHRIRAME
VERSUS
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CO LTD
THROUGH ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. Nasimuddin Shaikh, Advocate h/f Mr. Ananta Ramteke, Advocate
for the Petitioner in Both WPs
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for Respondents/State
Mr. Sanjay Mundhe, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in Both
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. Both the writ petitions are disposed of by directing
respondent No.2 to decide the representations of the petitioners
dated 04/06/2026 and 09/06/2026 respectively, within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, by a
reasoned speaking order, especially in view of the fact that the
petitioners’ validity has now been sanctioned by the Caste Scrutiny
Committee. All the contentions of the petitioners are kept open.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
2 70-72.odt
SVH
Checking your session…