Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JIVAN SABOOWALLAversusAMEET PARESH SAVANT

Disposal
Disposed of

Holding

The court directed the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Merces, to decide the pending criminal cases within three months, granting the writ of mandamus.

Summary

The petitioner, a 90‑year‑old man, filed six criminal writ petitions seeking a mandamus directing the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Merces to dispose of six pending criminal cases within three months. The petitioner argued that his advanced age warranted an expedited hearing. The respondent consented to the direction and raised no objection. The court noted that the complainant’s evidence was complete and the accused had not led any evidence, indicating no impediment to speedy disposal. Accordingly, the court issued a mandamus directing the magistrate to decide the cases within a period not exceeding three months and disposed of the petitions without costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel a Judicial Magistrate to decide pending criminal cases within a specified time limit
  • Whether the petitioner’s advanced age constitutes a sufficient ground for directing an expeditious hearing
  • Whether the magistrate’s discretion can be overridden in the interest of speedy justice

Subjects

  • mandamus
  • expeditious trial
  • elderly petitioner
  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • judicial magistrate
  • time‑bound hearing

Judgment

2026:BHC-GOA:885                                                                            Jivan Saboowalla
                                                                                                         Vs.
                                                                                        Ameet Paresh Savant
                                                      __________________________________________________
                                                                             10 WPCR Nos. 113 to 118 of 2026



               Esha

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

            CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 113, 114, 115, 116, 117 & 118 OF 2026

             JIVAN SABOOWALLA                                             … PETITIONER


                              ~ VERSUS ~


             AMEET PARESH SAVANT                                        … RESPONDENT


             A PPEARANCES :


             for the Petitioner                Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Senior
                                               Advocate with Ms. Marie Rosette
                                               Pereira and Mr. Jitendra Adkonkar
             for the Respondent                Mr. Kishan Kavlekar



                                    CORAM : AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J.
                                    DATED : 23rd APRIL 2026
             P.C:


              1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to clear the office
                    objections, if any, during the course of the day.


              2. By the present Petitions, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the learned
                    Judicial Magistrate First Class/Incharge Court at Merces to decide the
                                                 Page 1 of 3
                                                April 23, 2026
                                                                          Jivan Saboowalla
                                                                                       Vs.
                                                                      Ameet Paresh Savant
                                    __________________________________________________
                                                           10 WPCR Nos. 113 to 118 of 2026


   following cases as early as possible and within a period not extending
   three months:-

                 i.    Case No. OA/289/2019

                 ii.   Case No. OA/170/2021

                iii.   Case No. OA/169/2021

                iv.    Case No. OA/145/2022

                v.     Case No. OA/132/2023

                vi.    Case No. OA/220/2022


3. A writ of mandamus is sought in view of the ground that the Petitioner
   is 90 years old and therefore, the proceedings be heard within a period
   of three months by the Magistrate/Incharge Court, Merces.


4. The learned Counsel for the Respondent submitted that he has no
   objection to such a direction. It is submitted that, in fact, the
   Respondent has given his consent before the Trial Court for
   expeditious hearing of these matters.


5. I am also informed that the Complainant’s evidence is complete and
   the Accused has not led any evidence so far.


6. In view thereof, I am inclined to allow the above Petitions in terms of
   prayer clause (A), which reads as follows:



                               Page 2 of 3
                              April 23, 2026
                                                                                                           Jivan Saboowalla
                                                                                                                        Vs.
                                                                                                       Ameet Paresh Savant
                                                                     __________________________________________________
                                                                                            10 WPCR Nos. 113 to 118 of 2026


                                             “Direct the Judicial Magistrate First Class
                                             at Merces, Goa to decide the Complaint of
                                             the Petitioner (Exb. A) within a time
                                             bound period and in any case not exceeding
                                             3 months.”


                              7. The Petitions are disposed of in the above terms.


                              8. No order as to costs.


                              9. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal
                                  Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or
                                  email of a digitally signed copy of this order.




                                                                                [ AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J. ]




                                                                Page 3 of 3
Signed by: ESHA SAINATH                                        April 23, 2026
VAIGANKAR
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 23/04/2026 17:54:34


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.