Bombay High Court
ANTARIKSH SINGHversusBRANCH MANAGER, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LTD. PANAJI BRANCH AND ANR
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The petition was disposed of as withdrawn, with no substantive order on the merits.
Summary
Petitioner Amrut filed a criminal writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking the defreezing of his bank account held with Kotak Mahindra Bank. The bank, through its counsel, informed the court that the account had already been defreezed. The petitioner’s counsel, acting on instructions from the petitioner, acknowledged the same. Consequently, the petitioner withdrew the petition. The court therefore disposed of the petition as withdrawn without addressing any substantive issues.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition seeking the defreezing of the petitioner’s bank account should be entertained
Subjects
- bank account
- defreezing
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1649
901 WPCR 215 2026
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.215 OF 2026
ANTARIKSH SINGH ... PETITIONER
Versus
BRANCH MANAGER, KOTAK MAHINDRA
BANK PVT. LTD. PANAJI BRANCH AND
ANR ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Kautuk Raikar and Mr. Digaj Bene, Advocates for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Omkar Kulkarni (Through V.C.), Advocate for Respondent
No. 1.
Mr. Gaurish Nagvekar, Additional Public Prosecutor for
Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 18th August, 2026
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1- Bank,
on instructions, states that the Petitioner's account has been
defreezed.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner also
received instructions from the Petitioner in this regard. In that view
of the matter, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: TARI AMRUT NAGESH
Designation: Private Secretary
Page 1 of 1
Date: 18/08/2026 18:44:42
18th August, 2026
Checking your session…