Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 4401–4600
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Akbari, a 55‑year‑old woman, who feared arrest in a case arising from a matrimonial dispute. The FIR alleged that she, along with seven others, attempted to strangle the victim using a gamcha, invoking sections of the BNS Act and …
Satkar Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the renewal of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. He is a bail‑granted accused in NCR No. 0097 of 2020 under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s …
The petitioners sought the quashing of a building permission and No Objection Certificate granted to private respondents for land that allegedly lies within a prohibited highway safety buffer zone, and also demanded mandamus directing the District Magistrate to decide a restoration application and …
The petitioner, Vijay Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 14236 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and other respondents. During the pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Shri Shiv Raj Singh, moved the Court seeking withdrawal of the …
Petitioners Siddharth Sonkar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 25‑03‑2026 registered under Section 351(3) of the BNS Act and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. They alleged that the FIR was fabricated because petitioner‑1 was in a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Awadhesh, who was charged under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 105 in a murder case. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing to a seven‑day delay between the alleged incident and the filing of the FIR and arguing …
Vandana Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 22‑05‑2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, in a complaint case registered under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC. The …
The applicant, Smt Babli, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura, to decide Session Trial No. 275 of 2026, which has been pending since 2026, within a stipulated period. The application did …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Kanpur Police Commissioner to enforce a temporary injunction granted in his civil suit, alleging that the respondent had dispossessed him despite the injunction. The court noted that the temporary injunction …
The petitioner sought to quash a notification acquiring his land in Rehra village, to set aside a circle‑rate list that omitted his property, and to compel the Collector and the acquiring authority to revise the circle rate and award compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1989. Relying on the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Aditya Pratap Singh under Section 482 of the CrPC in a robbery case (Crime No. 159 of 2026). The FIR named unknown persons, and the applicant's name appeared only in a co-accused's confessional statement after nine days, with no …
The petitioner, Ranjana Goswami, paid money on behalf of Sardar Manohar Singh to the Varanasi Development Authority and sought the execution of a sale deed either in her name or in the name of Sardar Manohar Singh, but the Authority failed to act. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the …
The applicant, Tejpal Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Sessions Judge, Baghpat, to dispose of Session Trial No. 1477 of 2024 (arising out of Crime No. 563 of 2024 under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 427, 504, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related proceedings on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the State. The State’s counsel did not oppose the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The Court held …
The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the re‑issuance of his passport, which was pending before the Regional Passport Officer. The respondents contended that a show‑cause notice had been issued because a criminal case (Case Crime No. 0034 of 2024) under …
The petitioner, Samim Bantu @ Mota, challenged an externment order dated 06.08.2026 issued under Section 3(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970, which sent him out of Agra district for six months. He filed a writ petition seeking (i) certiorari to quash the externment order, (ii) …
The petitioner, Intezar Noori, filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 27‑08‑2026 under Section 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 67 of the Income‑Tax Act, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, before any arrest, the police be directed …
Petitioners Ahmad Ali and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 13‑08‑2026 registered under sections 75, 333, 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. During the pendency of the petition, sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act were added, making the alleged victim a child. …
The petitioner, Manish Kumar Chauhan, complained that his neighbour (respondent No.6) was polluting the atmosphere and dumping garbage on his land. He filed a complaint with the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) on 10 November 2025, which issued a notice to the respondent on 22 November …
The applicants, Rashid and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1361 of 2024) pending under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 324, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable …
The petitioners, GS Express Ltd., challenged the declaration of Respondent No.7 as the L‑1 bidder and technically qualified in Tender No. YEA/GM(P)/2026/495, alleging procedural irregularities, improper consideration of subcontractor experience, and incorrect bid capacity calculations. They sought …
The applicant Shailendra Joshi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the order dated 27‑10‑2021 in Criminal Case No. 896/2021, which involved alleged offences under Sections 411, 414 of the Bh. D. San and Sections 3/25 and 30 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued …
Petitioners Gufran Ali and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 01.06.2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various IPC sections. The State, represented by the Advocate General, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and the …
The petitioner, Sahab Singh Yadav, was transferred from Prayagraj to Etawah and sought to retain the government‑allotted house because his daughter is studying in Class IX. He relied on a DG Police letter dated 21 November 2016 allowing retention of accommodation when a child is in Class IX or XI, …
The petitioner, Archna, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Iglas, to dispose of Criminal Case No.1263 of 2025 (arising from Crime No.163 of 2024) within the stipulated period. The case involves …
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav filed a writ petition challenging an alleged illegal encroachment on public land identified as Garha (Arazi No. 19, 0.2060 hectare). The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others, contested the claim. The Court examined whether the writ jurisdiction was the …
The applicant, Veeresh, was named in an FIR dated 07.05.2026 under several sections of the B.N.S. and sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, claiming innocence and false implication. The prosecution opposed, arguing a prima facie case based on the injury report, FIR, and witness …
The petitioner, Meera Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Ayukta of Gorakhpur to issue a death certificate for her missing husband, who had been absent since August 2015. The petitioner argued that a civil death had occurred after seven years of …
The applicant, Ravendra Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the hearing, …
The applicants, Amit Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No.1111 of 2026) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, which involved offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that a compromise had been reached with the second opposite party. The State opposed no objection to filing a compromise …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12 May 2025 and the cognizance order dated 27 August 2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Afroj under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that she was …
The applicant, Abhishek Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 172 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the case was based on a single entry in a gang chart, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to dismantle an abandoned handpipe obstructing access to his bhumidhari land, relying on a spot inspection report. He also highlighted a pending application dated 22 July 2026 that had not been …
Smt. Sarita Devi, a former railway employee, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a revision of her pension to an extraordinary family pension (category C) at 60% of basic pay under the Railway Service (Extraordinary) Pension Rules, 1993, and challenging a rejection order dated …
The High Court of Allahabad heard a contempt application filed by Balaraj alleging that Sri Ravi Kumar Ng, the Development Authority, willfully defied a July 30, 2025 order directing the Authority to pass a reasoned order on a petition for a 10% residential plot. The original order required the …
The applicants, Kapil Gill and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.11657 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had …
Sachin applied for bail in Criminal Case No.207 of 2026, facing a slew of charges under the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The court noted that co‑accused Monu Singh and Vikash had already been granted bail in a similar …
Premila Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Azamgarh to act on a representation dated 31 July 2026. The Court examined whether a petition for the mere decision of a non‑statutory representation is maintainable. It …
The applicants, Mohd Asad and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.857 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under sections 85, 75, 76, 115(2), 352 and 305 of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 …
Shivmangal applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Sections 8, 20 and 60) where he was alleged to be the intended recipient of contraband. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the only link to the case was a confessional statement of a co‑accused, which the court held has no evidentiary value. …
The applicants, Dharmveer Bhati and another, filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 26‑01‑2025 and the cognizance order dated 20‑03‑2025 in a criminal case where they were charged under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) (equivalent to IPC Sections 420 and 406). …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari order to quash an FIR dated 17‑09‑2025 registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and a mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest them. The …
Smt. Soniya Sangwan applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. She contended that the prosecution was based on two earlier cases for which she had already been granted bail and that the present charge …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving sections of the Dowry Prohibition Act and other offences, on the ground that they had reached an out‑of‑court compromise with the State. Both …
The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 10‑07‑2026 (Crime No. 0170/2026) under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and B.N.S. 85, and a mandamus directing the third respondent not to arrest him. The State, represented by …
Mukrim @ Mukarram applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on five other criminal cases for which he had already been released on bail, and that he was falsely …
The applicant, Shashi Bind Rajbhar, filed a bail application in a case registered under Section 2(b)(1)/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had already been granted bail in two …
Mahi Construction filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its registration under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, based on a system‑generated notice dated 14‑08‑2025 that lacked the name, office or digital signature of any authorized officer. The High Court examined whether a notice …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Samsad Quraishi under Section 482 CrPC in a case under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that his alleged involvement rested solely on a …
Jai Singh Patel applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Ravi Prakash, had already been released on bail in a …
Jitendra Kumar Patel applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 32895 of 2026, relating to Crime No. 362 of 2026 under Sections 318(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3), 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The court noted that a co‑accused, Ravi …
The applicant, Sahil, filed a bail application in a case under Section 2/3(B)(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and has no criminal history. He had been in custody since 13 August 2026 and …
The applicant, Ashfaq@ Ashwaaq, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 444 of 2026) under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement stemmed only from a confessional statement of …
The petitioners, who are existing street vendors, applied for vending shop allotments under Section 3 of the Street Vending Act, 2014, but the Noida Development Authority failed to issue licenses or allotment letters despite completing surveys and selection. The petitioners filed a writ petition …
Ramesh Bhati filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the chargesheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20‑09‑2023 in a case where he was charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC. The applicant contended that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicant, Rohin Tyagi, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging innocence and lack of cogent evidence. He argued that he had been detained since 20 August 2026 and was willing to cooperate with the …
The applicant, Abrar, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 249 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 70(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act. The first bail plea was rejected because of the victim's injury, but subsequently three key …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in Criminal Case No.10295 of 2026, arising from offences under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85 of the BNSS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 15‑06‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 07‑10‑2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Ballu (Criminal Case No. 21291 of 2025). The High Court examined …
Smt. Uma Bishnoi filed a writ petition seeking regularization in service under Section 33-G(d) of the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982. The single judge dismissed the petition, noting the petitioner had not shown evidence of regular work and granted a liberty to approach …
The petitioner, a co‑tenure holder of a jointly purchased plot, challenged a final decree of partition dated 17‑06‑2014 and subsequent appellate orders, alleging that the suit was never filed by him and that his signatures on the plaint, vakalatnama, compromise and qurras were forged. He filed a …
The petitioners, Vipul Pandey and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 09‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 85 of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, and to restrain their arrest. They also made an innocuous prayer that …
The applicants, Raj Singh Gautam and Aman Singh, were arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 2.67 grams and 2.147 grams of ganja. They contended that the seized quantity was below the commercial …
Petitioner Radhey Shyam Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to execute a recovery certificate and a non‑bailable warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gautam Buddha Nagar. The Court …
Petitioners Kiran and seven others filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 31.08.2026 and a stay on further investigation, invoking several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. They also prayed that, before any arrest, the police be directed to follow the Supreme Court's …
The petitioner, Jitendra Nagar, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to State authorities (respondents 2‑5) to act on applications dated 02‑04‑2026 and 27‑07‑2026, and also sought relief against respondent 6 for alleged trespass into his house. The Court observed that the grievance stems from a …
The applicant, Durvesh @ Tunda, applied for bail in a criminal case under Sections 351(2), 140(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5M/6 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act. He claimed absolute innocence, stating that the key witnesses (PW‑1 to PW‑4) had turned hostile and rescinded their earlier statements. The …
The applicant, Sagar Chauhan, was charged in Crime No. 452 of 2026 under several provisions of the Information Technology Act, including sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) BNS and 66D. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial, asserting that he has no prior criminal record. The …
Ahsan, the applicant, sought bail in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He had previously been granted bail in 2009, cooperated with the trial until 2019, but could not attend thereafter and surrendered on 13 August 2026, remaining in …
Dinesh Yadav applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 132 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Passport Act, 1967. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that his documents were never handed to co‑accused Monu Yadav, who is alleged to have …
The applicants, Shadad and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants, Ms. Akanksha Mishra, later informed the court that she no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel, Sanjeev Patel, sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Suhail, the husband of a woman who alleged he attempted to strangle her. The FIR, lodged by the victim's brother‑in‑law, charged Suhail and a co‑accused under IPC Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 85, …
The petitioners, Divya College of Education, sought a writ of certiorari to quash an ex parte order dated 08‑05‑2026 by the Vice‑Chancellor of Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University that declined the extension of affiliation for their B.Ed. programme for 2026‑27. The college argued that the order was …
The petitioners Keshri Hind and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 19‑08‑2026 (Crime No.0253 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act, and also requested that they not be …
The applicant, Bharat Tevatiya, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and claiming he is not a gang member. He argued that he had already been granted bail in related cases and that …
The applicants, Sameer Ahmad and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.30327/2026, which involved charges under various sections of the BNSS, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …
The applicant Rishabh filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 131 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code, fearing arrest in a case arising from a road‑traffic accident that allegedly turned into a fabricated assault. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, was not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the order dated 14‑10‑2024 of the Fast Track Court, Basti, which had instituted criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 402 of 2024) under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants …
The applicant, Dilashana @ Choni, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.8026/9 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in Case No.1153 of 2016 (State vs. Rajneesh Upadhyay) relating to offences under Sections 120B, 419 and 420 of the IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑06‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 08‑09‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur, in a case under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicants contended that …
The applicants Mahendra Pal Singh and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 16‑02‑2026, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27‑04‑2026, and the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No. 469 of 2026. They …
Kuldeep Rajput applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.117 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 288 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The High Court noted that a co‑accused, …
Mudassir filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 12‑12‑2023 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.378/9 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 of the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Muslim …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Varanasi to consider their grievance and decide an application dated 20‑05‑2026 within a stipulated time. The State respondents pointed to a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which provides that such claims should be …
Naresh Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.23 of 2026) involving charges under Section 351(3) of the IPC, Sections 62/64(2) of the B.N.S., and Section 67A of the Income Tax Act. This was his second bail application after a prior denial on 18.05.2026. The applicant's counsel could not …
The petitioners sought to quash a First Information Report dated 29‑08‑2026 in Crime No. 0445 of 2026, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 333 of the B.N.S, and prayed that the police not arrest them. They also requested that any arrest, if made, follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in …
Maya Shankar Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two non‑bailable warrants dated 28‑02‑2024 and 27‑08‑2026 issued by the Additional Session Judge, Azamgarh, in a trial concerning offences under IPC sections 323, 325, 504 and 506. The High …
The applicant, Ashif, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, alleging false implication. The prosecution recovered 60 kg of beef from a co‑accused, but no forensic report established that the meat was from a cow. The applicant had no prior …
The applicant, Anugar Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking the release of three mobile phones seized by the police in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the phones were falsely implicated, that retaining them …
The petitioner, Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition seeking correction of her date of birth and her husband's name in her High School marksheet (Roll No. 4205352) issued by Durgdeo Janta Inter College, Jaunpur. She alleged that the marksheet incorrectly recorded her birth date and husband's name …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pintu alias Vikas and Ravindra Singh in a case under Section 108 of the B.N.S., alleging abetment to suicide. The applicants, related to the deceased, claimed they were falsely implicated and that the post‑mortem showed death by asphyxia due to …
The applicant, Dhirendra Singh, sought bail in a case under Sections 5 and 25 of the Arms Act, alleging innocence and claiming that the recovery of a country‑made pistol and related tools from his possession was false. He had been in custody since 12 August 2026 and had no prior criminal record. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 37266/2026, where the prosecution had charged them under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) BNS together. They contended that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Delhi …
Gulshan Kumar filed an application under Section 528 BNS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 7 May 2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 15 July 2025, and the entire proceedings in State of U.P. v. Rahul and others. The applicant contended that the charge sheet improperly included both …
The petitioners purchased flats from OMEX Company based on a brochure promising that 60% of the land would be used for sports and recreational facilities. The builder later sought to convert the land for commercial purposes, prompting the petitioners to submit a representation to the Greater Noida …
M/s Star Brick Industries, operating a brick‑kiln, sought renewal of its Consolidated Consent to Operate under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The consent, originally valid until 31 July 2026, was revoked on 19 August 2025 for alleged non‑compliance, but the revocation was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2025 and a cognizance order dated 01‑05‑2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, in a case arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.S. The …
The applicant Kapil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash the charge-sheet and the cognizance/summoning order dated 03.02.2023 in a case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicant argued that Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 …
The applicant, Ghoore @ Ashirvad, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2026) alleging false implication in offences under Sections 109, 115(2), 333 and 352 IPC. He claimed the FIR was lodged a day after the incident and that there was a …
Kapil Sharma (alias Surendra Kumar) was named among twelve accused in a 2021 assault case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 504, 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming no prior criminal record and reliance on an interim protection order previously granted in a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Narendra Kumar (also known as Naresh Kumar) in a NDPS case (Crime No. 0151 of 2026) where he was not named in the FIR but was mentioned in the confessional statement of co‑accused Pannalal Lodhi under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The applicant …
Sonia Gupta and Astha Gupta filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order rejecting their applications for condonation of delay and recall of a maintenance order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. They argued that the delay of about 15 years was caused by the death of their counsel …
The petitioner, Raju Gangwar, filed Writ Petition No. 4845 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner’s counsel, Kapil Gupta, failed to appear and made no request for an adjournment. The respondent's …
The appellant, Kundan, filed Criminal Appeal No. 1041 of 1984 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the appeal. The State was represented by counsel A.G.A., and the court heard the learned Additional Government Pleader Rajendra Singh and examined …
The appellant Bal Kishun was convicted under IPC Section 307 for an offence committed in 1983 and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. After more than four decades, the appellant, now 77 years old and suffering from serious health ailments, sought a reduction of his sentence, arguing that …
Hari Mohan was convicted under IPC sections 395/397 (and later 307) and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. After serving about two and a half years, he filed a criminal appeal 42 years after the 1984 incident, now being 67 years old and on bail. The appellant argued that the sentence …
The appeal arose from a murder arising out of a dispute over diversion of canal water. The complainant Balak Ram alleged that Chandrapal fired a country‑made pistol at his son Jai Veer, causing fatal injuries, and that the other accused aided the act. The trial court convicted Chandrapal under IPC …
The appellant Bhajan Singh filed Criminal Appeal No. 1983 of 1985 before the Allahabad High Court. A report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate dated 5 September 2026 disclosed that Bhajan Singh had died ten years earlier. The court considered whether the appeal could continue after the death of the …
The appellant Raj Kumar was convicted under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly preparing to commit dacoity and possessing illegal firearms. The prosecution's case relied on police testimony and two public witnesses, one of whom was hostile and denied seeing any …
The appellant Smt. Krishna Devi filed a criminal appeal (No. 516 of 1986) against Deo Nath and others. The appellant’s counsel appeared, but no one appeared on her behalf to argue. The court was informed, via an office memo dated 07‑07‑2026, that the appellant had died. On the ground that the …
The State of U.P. through the Executive Engineering Irrigation Division-II filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 55028 of 2000) against the Presiding Officer of the Labour Court and another respondent. The petition was heard before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 2051 of 2019) was filed by Gayadas Paramhans Vidhyapeeth and others against the State of U.P. and others. The case remained pending since 2019 and was listed as an old case for priority hearing. The court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 must be taken up and, …
The applicants (Shiv Pratap Shukla and four others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 66 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had …
The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar Bhattacharya, filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 50527 of 2011) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed as an ‘Oldest Pending Cases for Priority Hearing’, but the petitioner failed to appear. The Court observed that, owing to the passage of time and the …
Krishna Keshav Soni filed Special Appeal No. 305 of 2014 against the Union of India. The appeal was listed for priority hearing but was barred by a delay of 139 days. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The Court observed that the appellant had lost interest in the petition due to the …
The writ petition filed by Ramesh Chandra in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court had issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Despite these …
The writ petition filed by Keshav Singh in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court noted that the case was listed among the oldest pending matters and a notice had been issued requiring parties to indicate whether the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Ramotar in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The High Court issued a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the petition marked to indicate …
The writ petition filed by Rampal in 2014 remained pending for over a decade with no appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The court noted a notice directing that old cases up to 2022 be taken up and dismissed as infructuous if there was no appearance or indication that the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Smt. Shashi against the State of U.P. and others has been pending since 2014. The High Court issued a notice that old cases up to 2022 would be heard in the first round and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, Niteesh Dixit, filed a writ petition (Writ-C No. 57105 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed as an 'Oldest Pending Cases' for priority hearing. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing date. The court observed that, owing to the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 448 of 2017) alleging offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement outside court, and the …
S/S Nishant Traders, a dealer in cement and steel bars, was assessed for the AY 2010-11 based on a diary seized from a third‑party dealer, M/s Suraj Building Material, which contained entries marked "NT" and the name of Satya Narayan Jaiswal, the uncle of Nishant Traders' proprietor. The assessing …
S/S Nishant Traders filed a revision petition challenging the assessment of commercial tax by the Commissioner Commercial Tax, U.P., Lucknow. The petition was heard by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 7, before Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal. The court disposed of the revision …
S/S Nishant Traders filed a revision petition (Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 438 of 2017) against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P., Lucknow. The matter was heard by Justice Piyush Agrawal in Court No. 7 of the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner was Aditya Pandey and counsel for …
S/S Nishant Traders filed a revision petition challenging the commercial tax assessment made by the Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Piyush Agrawal. The court disposed of the petition, referring to the order passed in Sales/Trade …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State. The matter remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant despite being listed. The learned Additional …
The petitioners (State of U.P. through the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division) challenged an award that ordered reinstatement and back‑wages for several workers who claimed they were retrenched without complying with the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act. A conditional interim order stayed …
The State of Uttar Pradesh, represented by the Executive Engineer of Irrigation Division II, filed a writ petition against the P.O. Labour Court Gorakhpur and another respondent. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery of the Allahabad High Court. The court observed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS) and the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482 CrPC) seeking to quash Complaint No. 111 of 2022, which alleged that they robbed a motorist under Section 392 IPC. The applicants …
The Allahabad High Court entertained two writ petitions challenging the validity of awards issued by a tribunal at Dehradun before the creation of Uttarakhand. The petitioners argued that Sections 90 and 91 of the U.P. Re‑organization Act, 2000 required any proceeding pending on the appointed date …
Petitioner U.P.S.R.T.C. Meerut filed writ petition No. 32996 of 2002 before the Allahabad High Court against respondents K.P. Singh Driver and another. The petition was listed before Hon’ble Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court observed that an order had already been passed in writ C No. 22861 …
The petitioners, two fair price shop licensees, challenged the suspension and subsequent cancellation of their licenses by the District Supply Officer, Mau, on grounds that they had not pasted the BPL list and had not obtained a distribution certificate from the Gram Pradhan. They argued that a …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 19170 of 2019) was filed by Sudarshan Goswami against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter remained pending for several years and, when called on, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The High Court …
The petitioners, Uma Devi and two others, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Urban Ceiling authority that rejected their representation to have land entries restored in their names. They alleged that notices required under Sections 10(5) and 10(6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and …
The petitioner, Kiran Rathi, sought the recovery of Rs.5,36,092 that had accumulated in the bank account of her deceased mother, Late Kamla Devi, a family pensioner of the Indian Railways. The Union Bank of India had reverted the amount to the railway authorities without prior notice, citing the …
The petitioner, Omkant Pandey, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not to demolish his construction on land in Mohalla Purana Ait, Tehsil Orai, District Jalaun, and to consider his representation dated 08.07.2019. The respondents countered that …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan, filed a writ petition seeking correction of revenue records and a restraining order against the State of Uttar Pradesh concerning a 13,427.58 sq.m. parcel of land originally held by his predecessor Jagannath. The land was declared excess vacant under the Urban Land …
Dr. Suman Srivastava filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing under the "Oldest pending cases" heading. On the day of hearing, no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner except the standing counsel, and no response was filed. The …
The petitioner Angad Mallah filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for priority hearing, but on the revised call no representative of the petitioner appeared, only the standing counsel was present. The court noted the absence and dismissed the writ petition in …
The petitioners, workmen of Novateur and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd., challenged a Labour Commissioner order that a 2000 minimum‑wages notification did not apply to them, arguing they were not heard before the decision. The employer had earlier sought clarification on the applicability of the 2000 …
The petitioner, Ashish Anand, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The case was listed for hearing on 2 February 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. Subsequent hearings also saw no appearance by the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in …
Manoj Kumar and another filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter. The revision was listed but the revisionists failed to appear before the court. The opposite party, represented by Rahul Sahai, was present. The court held that the delay condonation application could not be …
The revision petition filed by Shiv Shankar Khandelwal against Raj Kishore Kodesia was heard before the Allahabad High Court. The counsel for the petitioner, Bhaskar Bhadra and Pankaj Agarwal, informed the court that there were no further instructions in the case. The court found no grounds to …
The revisionist filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in an application (No. 343830 of 2017). The court noted that no counsel appeared to press the application on behalf of the revisionist. The opposite party's counsel was present. Since the revisionist failed to prosecute the application, …
A revision petition (No. 119 of 2017) was filed by Anees Ahmad Khan against the deceased Bharat Singh Sharma and six others, seeking condonation of delay under application No. 347870 of 2017. The matter was listed in the revised list, but the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The High …
The petitioners Nazma Siddiqui filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending matter. The revision application (No. 219144 of 2015) was listed but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The court observed that there was no prosecution of the application by the revisionist. …
The petitioners filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in a pending application. The revisionist, Shri Man Singh, was represented by counsel Rajesh Gupta. No appearance was made by the revisionist to press the application before the High Court. The court observed that the delay condonation …
A revision petition was filed by Pawan Kumar Jain against Ramesh Chandra Gupta. The petitioners were represented by counsel Adarsh Bhushan and R.K. Singh Gaharwar, while the opposite party was represented by Chandra Bhan Gupta. No substantive material or prosecution was presented by the petitioners …
The petition filed by Km. Luxami Kanaujiya against the State of U.P. and others was listed as likely to be infructuous. The High Court, after noting this, dismissed the petition. The court observed that if any cause of action still survives, the aggrieved party may move an appropriate application …
Smt. Munni Devi filed a petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against Munna Lal and two others. The petitioner was represented by counsel Manish Tandon and Vivek Srivastava. The respondent’s counsel was Prashant Mishra. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner stated that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 48508 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing. The court noted the passage of time and inferred that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court …
Dr. Vijay Kumar Sahu filed a revision seeking condonation of delay in his application No. 57546 of 2017. The revision was listed but the revisionist failed to appear before the court. The court held that without any prosecution of the application, it could not be entertained. Consequently, the delay …
The petitioner, Prem Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and only counsel for one of the respondents was present. The Court observed that the petition was not prosecuted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 39496 of 2014) was filed by Prem Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The matter had been pending since 2014 and was listed as an oldest pending case for priority hearing. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and the case was not marked to indicate …
The writ petition (Writ‑A No. 40014 of 2014) was filed by Rajendra Singh against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The case remained pending since 2014 and was listed among the oldest cases for a priority hearing. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, and the petition was not marked to …
The writ petition filed by Arvind Singh in 2014 remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioner’s counsel. The High Court noted that the case was listed among the oldest pending matters and a notice had been issued requiring parties to indicate whether the cause of action …
The writ petition filed by Ram Swaroop in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The court issued a notice that all old cases up to 2022 would be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that the …
The writ petition filed by Smt. Somwati in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not mark the case to indicate that the cause of action still survived, despite a notice directing parties to do so for old cases. The court noted that the case …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, but neither party appeared before the court. The petition was not prosecuted further. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim orders that may have been in place.
Om Prakash Pandey filed Writ‑A No. 45696 of 2014 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petition was listed but no substantive pleadings or documents were filed by the petitioner. The learned Standing Counsel and the respondent’s …
The writ petition filed by Mukesh Kumar in 2014 remained pending for over a decade. The court issued notices directing that old cases up to 2022 be heard and that non‑appearance could lead to dismissal as infructuous. Neither the petitioner’s counsel appeared nor was the case marked to show that the …
The Commercial Tax Tribunal allowed a credit‑note exemption for S/S Kanohar Electricals Ltd. even though the sale invoice did not show any credit amount and the dealer had not obtained a debit note from the purchaser as required under Section 21 of the U.P. VAT Act. The Assessing Authority and the …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the State and other respondents to halt proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to record the disputed 7,636.21 sq m land in their name, and to prevent interference with their possession. The land originally belonged to Moti Lal …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Laxman Prasad and others. The applicants' counsel did not appear before the High Court, and the same absence was noted on a prior occasion. The Court observed that no representation was made on behalf of the applicants. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's intervention. The matter remained pending for several years. On the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State was represented by its Additional …
The revisionist, a 17‑year‑old juvenile, was denied bail by the Juvenile Justice Board and the appellate court in a heinous‑offence case. He filed a criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, contending that the Board failed to satisfy …
The appellants sought to set aside a judgment dismissing their civil appeal for non‑prosecution, contending they had no notice of the pendency of the appeal due to the death of several parties. The trial court had dismissed their restoration application under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC and refused to …
The applicant, Ali Pasha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court had earlier directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 30,000 with the Mediation Centre, but the applicant failed to do so as per the mediation report dated 28.08.2024. No counsel …
The appellant Shashi Pratap Singh challenged the acquittal of Arun Singh and his mother-in-law Usha Singh for alleged dowry harassment, dowry death and related offences arising from the death of his sister Asmita Singh, who was found hanged within a year of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajad (N.K. Sharma) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 70(2), 75, 79, 351(3), 308(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 5(g), 6, 7, 8 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a material …
The petitioners, a charitable trust, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 25 June 2026 issued by the Manager of Punjab and Sindh Bank, which declined their request to restore and de‑freeze a bank account. The petitioners had earlier submitted an application on 16 June 2026 seeking …
The husband, Mohd Waris, and nine others were charged under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354, 354-A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act following a matrimonial dispute. The wife filed an FIR, but the parties later reached a compromise through a mediation centre, agreeing to …
The petitioner, Nitin Sahariya, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13 May 2026 issued by the Additional Secretary of the Secondary Education Board, Regional Office, Meerut, which refused to correct his date of birth in school records. The petitioner claimed that his date of birth was …
The applicant, Sarman Kushwaha, challenged an order dated 06‑12‑2025 of the Family Court, Mahoba, which had issued a recovery warrant and an arrest warrant to enforce arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife had obtained interim …
The applicant, Vishnu Bawra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Mathura to conclude the inquiry in Complaint Case No. 80117 of 2025, which involves offences under Sections 302, 420, …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash the order dated 6 July 2026 of the Sub Divisional Officer that rectified plot no. 962 under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and to maintain a status‑quo on the patthargarhi. He alleged that the revenue report relied upon was …
Petitioner Bhola Nath Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mirzapur to decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 14495/2025) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 27 August 2025. The petitioner alleged that the …
Petitioner Rafik Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an order dated 18.03.2026 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Kushinagar, under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gunda Control Act, 1970. The State’s Additional Advocate General raised a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 730 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1079 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 25 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 07‑02‑2018 issued in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A and 323 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicants withdrew their challenge to the charge sheet and only …
The applicants, Mohd Hanif and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, expressed that he did not wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal …
The High Court entertained an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Smt Gayatri and two others seeking a direction to the Gram Nyayalay, Chauri Chaura, to decide a pending complaint (Case No. 2557 of 2018) filed under Section 31 of the Protection of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 58225 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
The applicant, Smt. Vertika Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a directive to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, to decide a pending family law matter (Case No. 651 of 2023) filed under Section 125 of the Criminal …
The applicant Ilma Khan filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Aligarh, to decide a pending domestic‑violence case (Case No. 400 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli, to decide a pending criminal case (State of U.P. v. Shamsher Khan) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, …
The applicant, Shobha Mishra, filed an application under Section 529 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC Court No. 41, Kanpur Nagar, to conclude the pending trial of State v. Rajat Soni (Session Trial No. 293 of 2024) which involves offences …
The applicant, Nisha Singh, filed an application under Section 529 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Senior Division)/FTC in Gorakhpur to decide a pending domestic violence case (Case No. 55109 of 2025) within a stipulated period. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Court No. VIII, Kanpur Nagar, to dispose of Criminal Case No. 8202185 of 2024 (State v. Avinish Pratap Singh et al.) which …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Genda Singh Urf Genda Lal, who is the father‑in‑law of a deceased woman alleged to have been poisoned. The applicant argued that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem report was inconclusive, and that the primary accused …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Nishad, who was arrested in Crime No.187 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 238(b) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, the case relied solely on circumstantial …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash @ Bhunda, who was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.163 of 2025) based solely on being the last person seen with the deceased. The FIR was initially lodged against an unknown person, but the investigation named the …
