Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 6001–6200
Ramveer Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for the disposal of an interim injunction application pending in Suit No. 279 of 2021 before the Civil Judge, Kol, Aligarh. The petitioner’s counsel limited the prayer to this specific application after arguments. The …
Laxminarayan applied for bail in a non‑bailable offence (Case Crime No.101 of 2026) under Section 103(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined the facts, noting that a co‑accused, Shakuntala Mishra, had already been granted bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior …
Petitioner Baijnath filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Family Court to decide his divorce petition (Case No. 1722 of 2024) under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act expeditiously, alleging the matter has been pending since 2024. The petitioner relied on Section 21-B …
Arjun Tyagi applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Crime No.202 of 2026). He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case already listed in a gang chart, that he had previously been …
The petitioners, Roopa Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Varanasi, to decide a Section 6‑C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 932 of 2024. The High Court examined whether it could intervene at the …
Shaham was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 9(51) of the Wildlife Protection Act in Crime No. 95 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Abdul Gaffar, had …
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued on 21‑06‑2022 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court noted that the contentions raised were essentially factual …
The petitioners, M/S Annapurna General Merchant and two others, sought a writ directing the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to promptly decide a stay application and the pending securitization proceedings against a borrower who defaulted on a bank loan. The High Court noted that the matter required …
The petitioners, Smt Aasha Prabha Jain and two others, filed a writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 13‑08‑2026 issued by the respondents, the State of UP and two others. The petition sought relief against any coercive action pending the resolution of the notice. The Court, without …
Ganesh applied for bail in Crime No. 419 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the case was filed due to police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he had already been granted bail in related …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the trial court to decide Misc. Case No.102 of 2021 within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) 6 SCC 267, which held that …
The applicant, Hashim, was arrested in Crime No. 222 of 2026 under IPC sections 305‑A, 331(4) and 317(2) BNS for an alleged theft. He pleaded that he is innocent, that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and that the recovery alleged by the police is false, emphasizing his clean record and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR and was only …
The petitioners, Ajay Lakhera, filed a criminal revision challenging an ex parte maintenance order dated 1 June 2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mahoba, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. They sought quashing and a stay of the order, arguing that the order was …
Rahul Kumar Yadav was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act, 1960. He applied for bail during the pendency of the trial, contending that he was not arrested at the spot and that his name …
The applicant, Danish, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted …
Mukesh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash the proceedings of Special Case No. 794 of 2026, which arose from a POCSO matter involving Sections 5M/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 65(2) of the BNSS. During the hearing, counsel for the …
Rahat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.274 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted bail, and …
The applicant, Keshav, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0019 of 2025) after his earlier bail plea was denied. He claimed that two new witnesses examined after the first order did not support the prosecution, asserting readiness to cooperate with trial and not misuse …
The petitioner, a school official, challenged a suspension order dated 14‑08‑2026 issued by the District Basic Education Officer on several allegations, including delayed construction of a handicap toilet, low assessment percentages on the Nipun Plus app, and alleged misuse of mid‑day meal funds. …
The petitioner challenged an order passed under Section 47A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, contending that the order was ex parte and that notice had not been served. The Court held that the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal or revision, even if the order was ex …
Kaushik Mazumdar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0362 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 61(2) and 318(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. The application was heard …
The petitioners, Smt. Tanu Sharma and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35666 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, opposed the petition on the ground that the same matter had already been registered as Mu. A. 0. San 455/2026 under Section …
The applicant, Golu Kumar (also known as Shivshankar Kumar), applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.30 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66‑D of the …
The applicant, Om Prakash, filed a bail application in a case registered under Section 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication and lack of prior criminal history. He had been in custody since 19 May 2026 and claimed that …
The Committee of Management of Shri Ashok Vidyalaya Inter College filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35566 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner's counsel, Rajesh Kumar, moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The standing counsel for the …
Pinku Kumar was arrested in connection with Crime No.30 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 316(5) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Prize and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act. He applied for bail during …
The applicant, Imran, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang chart case. He had been …
The applicant Rahul was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 345 of 2025) involving the deaths of two individuals, Raja and Subham. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a vague allegation that Rahul might have been involved, with no statements from the deceased, no direct evidence, and …
Anuj Kumar filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order dated 06.08.2026 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Aligarh, which directed him to pay Rs.4,500 per month to his wife, Smt. Lata alias Sonam. He contended that the amount was not commensurate with his …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Tetarbe filed a writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 16‑09‑2018 that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and 120‑B. The relief was later limited to protection under Section 41‑A of the CrPC. The Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a cognizable …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Anurak, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 237 of 2026 under Sections 318(4), 61(2) of the CrPC and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming he was falsely implicated in a …
Petitioner Dhirendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The police had already forwarded a charge sheet, and the petitioner’s counsel, Ram Krishna Yadav, requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Additional Government …
Abdul Salam applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 274 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been …
The petitioner, Krishna Chand, filed a writ petition seeking regularisation of his services with the U.P. State Warehousing Corporation. The respondents argued that the matter required factual determination by the competent authority and that the petitioner's claim should be examined by the Regional …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kush Patel, who was charged under several provisions of the B.N.S., the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that the co‑accused's statement implicating him lacked …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Pasi, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 310(2), 317(3) and 317(4) of the BNS. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the charge sheet had already been filed, and that co‑accused had already been …
Rajendra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, to pass an appropriate order on his representation dated 08‑06‑2026 against a State Government application dated 13‑10‑2022. The petitioners argued that the District Magistrate should decide the matter …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Nishad, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Gorakhpur to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 1964 of 2024. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had been …
The petitioner, Smt. Mainawati, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue to decide a stay application filed in Second Appeal No. 4589 of 2025 and to maintain the status quo over the disputed property. The Board of Revenue had admitted the second appeal on 27 October …
Sonu filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Rati Bhan Singh, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the counsel’s statement that there was no longer any cause of …
The petitioner, a former Class‑IV employee, retired on 31‑12‑2025 and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat, Goverdhan to pay his pension, gratuity and arrears of cost of living allowance (A.C.P.). He alleged that despite repeated …
The applicant, Mohd Nawab, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (318(4), 338, 336(3), 341(2), 317(2)), the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act in Crime No. 230 of 2026. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The …
Deepak Sharma applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case involving multiple IPC offences and a provision of the IT Act. The court noted that an accused’s prior criminal record cannot, by itself, justify continued detention if bail criteria are otherwise satisfied. The applicant’s criminal history was …
The applicant, Veerpal, sought bail in a case registered under Section 325 of the B.N.S., Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act and Section 3/8 of the U.P. Cow Slaughter Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated based on information from a squealer, which the court held …
The petitioner, a minor, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh writ with better particulars. The standing counsel for the respondents did not object to this request. …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 12‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4), 333, 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. While the petition later limited its relief to protection under section 35 of the …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 14‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petition was later limited to a request for protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 16‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 191(1), 316(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section …
Manoj Saini and seven others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 351(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioners limited their relief to protection under section 35 of …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested on 19 April 2026 in connection with a case involving multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant argued that co‑accused Pawan and Chhotu, who faced identical charges, …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Aditya Anand, who was charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing lack …
The High Court considered the bail application of Aditya Anand, who was arrested in Crime No.158 of 2026 on numerous charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He had been in custody since 19 April 2026. The applicant argued that a co‑accused, Jay Prakash, who faced …
The High Court considered the bail application of Hitlar, who is implicated in Crime No. 148 of 2026 under several IPC sections (191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 131, 126(2), 352, 61(2)). The applicant claims he is innocent, was not named in the FIR, and was only mentioned in a co‑accused's confessional …
Petitioners Pratibha Gautam and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school certificates and a pending …
The applicant, Mohd Aslam, applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunne @ Iliyas Khan, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. Relying on the principle of …
The applicant, Fardeen, was arrested in a narcotics case (Crime No.163 of 2026) for allegedly possessing 75 grams of smack, which is below the commercial quantity under the NDPS Act. He sought bail during the pendency of trial, arguing lack of prior criminal history, non‑compliance with the …
The petitioners, Kusumawati Devi and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gorakhpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (7-C) in Suit No. 2277 of 2023. The petitioners argued that the injunction application had …
The plaintiff's suit was decreed and the respondents' civil appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The respondents then filed an application under Order 41 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking expeditious disposal. The High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Article …
The petitioners, Smt Shouvi Masudi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted evidence of being adults, including high …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Small Cause Court/Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad, to decide a 6-C application filed in Original Suit No.470 of 2021. The High Court, finding no useful purpose in keeping the petition pending, disposed of it …
The applicant Rafi applied for bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 536 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act, alleging that the 107 grams of seized substance was below commercial quantity and that mandatory provisions of Sections 50 and 52-A were not complied with. The applicant’s counsel …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Kanpur Dehat to expedite Civil Suit No. 202 of 2014. The High Court examined whether it could issue a time‑bound directive to a subordinate court under Articles 226/227. It relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in High …
The petitioner, Smt. Ram Pyari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking speedy disposal of an application filed by plaintiff‑respondent No. 2 under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC. The original suit (Original Suit No. 29 of 2023) had been dismissed for want of prosecution because the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), F.C. Ghaziabad, to decide a temporary injunction application (6-C2) dated 04.03.2024 in Original Suit No. 133 of 2024. The High Court, finding no merit in continuing the petition, …
The applicant Sonu filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry, that he had no criminal history, and that he had already been granted …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Hawali, Aligarh to decide suit No. 642/2021 within a time limit set by the High Court. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of Uttar …
Komal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.133 of 2026) where she was not named in the FIR but was mentioned in a co-accused's confessional statement. The counsel argued that the confessional statement has no evidentiary value, the FIR was filed with a ten‑hour delay, and the only material …
The applicant, Sohanvir @ Pintu, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.100 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC (Bailable Non-Compounded) and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually injured in police cross‑fire, not responsible for any …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 02‑06‑2025, the summoning order dated 10‑07‑2026, and the entire proceedings in State Vs. Manoj and others. They also requested that the lower courts decide their bail applications …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 73 of 2026) on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The State opposed no objection to filing a compromise deed before the …
Anurag Goyal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 08‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(4) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to a protection order under …
The petitioners, 21 teachers serving as officiating Headmasters in junior high and primary schools, sought a mandamus directing the State to fix and pay them the salary of regular Headmasters under the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, and to decide a series of pending …
Sandhya filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Muhammad Nadeem, while the State of U.P. and others were represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested that the application be withdrawn. …
The applicant, Devideen Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 179 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the prosecution was based on three earlier cases in …
Mahendra Pal Sagar filed Writ No. 35713 of 2026 challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner had already submitted a representation dated 27‑07‑2026 to the Joint Director of Education (Secondary), Bareilly, seeking redress before a Three Members …
The appellant Devendra Kumar was assaulted on 16 November 2024, sustaining injuries confirmed by medical examination. He applied to the police to register an FIR, and after receiving no response, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a direction …
The applicant, Ganesh Madhesiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a recovery warrant dated 27‑07‑2026 issued by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, in execution case No.1163/2025 (Pooja Devi v. Ganesh). The applicant claimed innocence, alleging …
The applicant, Mohit, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No. 445 of 2018, which involved offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction that all criminal cases in which he had been granted bail should be secured by a single personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two common sureties. The court queried whether the applicant had previously …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1142 of 2025) pending against him, alleging that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined whether, at the stage of a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the second opposite party. The State opposed …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. filed by Ramesh Prajapati seeking to quash a summoning order dated 04‑04‑2023 and a bailable warrant issued by the Additional Civil Judge, Mirzapur in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 of …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1143 of 2025) pending against him in the Kanpur Sessions Court. He alleged that no offence was disclosed against him and that the prosecution was instituted with …
The petitioner, a former Pradhan (2010-2015), challenged a recovery order dated 16 May 2026 under Section 27 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, asserting that she was not served notice and was denied a hearing, as the proceedings were concluded ex-parte after a five‑year delay. The Court examined …
Gopal Tiwari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders that rejected his request to release two mobile phones seized in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 3803 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 189, 170, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Section 66 …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to provide him alternate employment on similar terms and to decide a pending application dated 14.08.2026. The respondents argued that the grievance regarding work allocation should be addressed by the …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried women living in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them from harassment and threats by family members. The court noted that the facts were analogous to the earlier decision in Noori v. State of …
Petitioners Anjali Patel and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including members of their families and the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection due to alleged threats. They …
Petitioner Abdul Samad filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Dumariyaganj to decide a pending Section 7‑C2 temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 403 of 2021. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending would …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the prayer, …
The petitioner Lakhan Lal challenged an order dated 15 July 2026 passed by the Appellate Authority under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling and Land Holdings Act, 1960. The High Court observed that the Appellate Authority failed to apply its independent mind and merely reiterated the Prescribed …
Adarsh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 352, 352(3), 79 and 67 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section 35 of the same …
Chhotu Kumar was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the U.P. Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, and applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the applicant's clean criminal record, and noted that a co‑accused, …
The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Mishra, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2 to consider and decide his representation for promotional and attendant benefits with interest. Respondent No.2 argued that the grievance should be addressed by the Managing Director and did not …
The applicant, Brijlal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a recovery warrant dated 04.05.2026 issued by the Family Court, Kaushambi, in a maintenance case (Sunita Devi v. Brijlal). The applicant's wife had earlier filed a maintenance application under Section 145(2) …
The applicant, Shahnwaz, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2026) involving alleged cyber fraud under Sections 318(4), 61, 317(2) of the IPC and Section 66(D) of the Income Tax Act. The prosecution alleged that Rs. 49,000 was transferred to the applicant's account. The applicant …
The petitioner, Saleem, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) of Baghpat to decide a Section 6-C temporary injunction application pending in Original Suit No. 164 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the petition pending would serve …
Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Firozabad, to decide his pending Hindu marriage petition (No. 687/2025) under Section 13(1)(1A) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the divorce petition had been …
Petitioners Mohni and another, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, …
Petitioner Ravindra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 02‑03‑2026 that alleged offences under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66C of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. The relief was later limited to protection …
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR dated 14‑07‑2026 under sections 281, 125(a) and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR and found it disclosed a cognizable offence, relying …
The petitioners, Ritika Sonkar and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection to prevent family members from interfering with their consensual adult marriage. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, alleging …
The petitioner, Ramjatan Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Jaunpur to decide his 2022 suit and a related application within a stipulated period. The petitioner relied on a recent Supreme Court decision that constitutional …
Divyansh Pandey applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.180 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238, 309(4) and 317(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant's name appeared in a co‑accused’s confessional statement, but the court held that such a statement has no …
The petitioners, who are defendants in a suit, filed a petition under Article 227 seeking an expedited decision on a temporary injunction (referred to as application 6C) filed by the plaintiff‑respondents, along with the defendants' objections to that injunction. The court observed that keeping the …
The petitioners, Hina Parveen and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection due to threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, …
The petitioner, Smt. Pushpa Devi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a court order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Koil, Aligarh to decide her 2014 civil suit within a time‑bound schedule. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar …
The petitioners, Jamal Ahmad and another, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Dumariyaganj, Siddharth Nagar to decide a 7‑C2 application filed in Original Suit No.302 of 2024. The High Court noted that the petition …
Shakti Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 5B of the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no animal was actually slaughtered …
Shivam Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act, 2024. The applicant had no prior criminal record. The learned counsel argued that a …
The applicant, Banti, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 606 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and Section 11(1)L of the Animal Cruelty Act. The High Court examined the facts, noting that the applicant's name does …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt Priti Srivastava (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31851 of 2026) in connection with a pending trial (Crime No. 20 of 2026) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant asserted that she is innocent, falsely …
The petitioner, Shafqat Ali, a senior clerk/accountant in the Nazul Department, retired on 30 April 2026 and alleged that his salary had not been paid since 16 January 2026 and that his retirement benefits, including pension and gratuity, remained unpaid. He filed a writ petition seeking mandamus …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Smt. Priti Srivastava, who was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)Ka of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed she was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no …
The petitioner’s fair‑price shop licence was suspended in 2010 after an inspection allegedly found shortages of sugar and wheat, leading to an FIR under the Essential Commodities Act. The licensing authority cancelled the licence on 25‑Sept‑2010 after the petitioner’s explanation was deemed …
The applicant, Akbar Ali alias Chingari, sought bail in a narcotics case (Crime No. 106 of 2026) under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court noted that the quantity of contraband recovered from him was below the commercial threshold and that a …
Mayank Bhatnagar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 25‑07‑2026 under Section 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and later limited his relief to protection under Section 35 of the same Act. The Court examined the FIR, found that it …
The petitioners, Munna Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The police had forwarded a charge sheet in the matter, and the learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the court that the petition was no longer required. The …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, sought a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and requested police protection. They submitted school certificates and a pending application for marriage registration to prove they are …
The applicant, Amit, was charged in Crime No.207 of 2026 under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the submissions of …
The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India, challenged an order of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) dated 17‑04‑2026 which resolved a dispute without conducting the mandatory conciliation process under Section 22‑C of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987. The petitioner argued that the PLA …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. filed by Amar Singh and two others seeking to quash a summoning order dated 17‑06‑2026 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in Farrukhabad. The applicants alleged that they were falsely implicated and that the magistrate …
The applicant, Insaf, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Crime No. 286 of 2023). He contended that the charges were fabricated due to police rivalry, that he had no gang affiliation, and that he …
Shivam Yadav applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 166 of 2026) under IPC sections 103(1) and 238 BNS. He argued that the FIR was lodged fifty days after the alleged offence, there was no identification parade under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, and eyewitness statements were recorded …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 37767 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under Sections 64(2)(f), 61(2) and 351(3) of the same Act. The application was presented …
The petitioner, Riyaj Ahmad, purchased a JCB vehicle (Regn. No. UP91AT3448) at auction but the Regional Transport Officer failed to issue a registration certificate or transfer registration to his name despite multiple representations. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction for the …
M/S Sameer Medical Agency challenged an adjudication order dated 26.03.2026 issued by the State of U.P., filing a writ petition (WTAX No. 3701 of 2026) after earlier proceedings were set aside and a hearing was ordered. The petitioner participated, filed a reply, and sought an adjournment which was …
Petitioners Shilpi Kumari and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted …
The petitioners, Smt. Shabana and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age …
Raghu Nishad filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution against Ajay Nishad and others. The petition sought relief despite the existence of a statutory appeal provision. The Court examined whether the petition was maintainable when an alternative remedy under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Verma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Ballia to decide his original suit (No. 2099 of 2021) and a pending substitution application within a stipulated period. The Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in …
Arun applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Section 109(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He claimed he was falsely implicated and was actually a victim of police cross‑fire, sustaining a gunshot injury himself. The State …
The applicant, Arun, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 52 of 2026) alleging his involvement in the alleged snatching of jewellery from an informant's mother, with charges under Sections 309(4), 317(2) and 317(4) of the Indian Penal Code. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
Kaleem was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 414 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act at Kotwali Mandi police station, Saharanpur. He applied for bail, asserting that he is innocent, that the allegations are false, and that no recovery of the alleged …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 19‑09‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 490 of 2024, which arose from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …
Petitioner Aadhar Choudhary filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 31.07.2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and later limited the relief to protection under section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court examined the …
The petitioner, Sajid Hussain, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bareilly, to decide a pending 6‑C temporary injunction application in Original Suit No. 164 of 2026. The High Court, noting that keeping the matter pending served no …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (Case No. 2557 of 2008, Anjum Bano v. Dr. Rakesh Pathak & Others) that alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 468, 201, 218 and 120B. They asserted that the parties had reconciled and a written compromise …
The applicant Komal filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, on the ground that a compromise had been …
The petitioners, Smt. Chanda Devi and three others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking the expeditious disposal of an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC in Original Suit No. 92 of 2020. The court observed that keeping the matter pending served no useful purpose and …
The applicant, Shrikant Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance and quash the charge sheet in a criminal case under the Essential Commodities Act. He contended that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was …
The petitioner, Chandra Shekhar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Shahar, Jaunpur, to decide a Section 6-C application pending in Original Suit No. 491 of 2026. The High Court, after examining the petition, found that no substantive …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them from harassment by family members. The court noted that the facts were analogous to the earlier decision in Noori v. State of U.P., where …
The petitioner, Ajay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Shahar, Jaunpur to decide a pending 6-C application in Original Suit No. 604 of 2025. The High Court examined the petition and, finding no merit to be …
Petitioners Mohd. Tasleem and others filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 26‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 318(2), 336(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While initially asking for the FIR to be set aside, the petitioners later limited their …
Petitioners Dular Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash an FIR dated 22‑08‑2026 that alleged offences under sections 61(2), 217, 229(2), 301 and 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. While the original prayer was …
The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering with their cohabitation and requesting police protection. They submitted age proof and joint affidavits to demonstrate …
The petitioners, both adults, claimed to have married of their own free will and sought a writ of mandamus to prevent interference by the father of one petitioner, alleging threats to their life and liberty. The State counsel argued that the marriage was void or voidable because the male petitioner …
The applicant, Sajid (also known as Asif), challenged recovery and arrest warrants issued against him for arrears of interim maintenance granted to his wife under Section 125 CrPC. The wife had obtained interim maintenance on 22.01.2019 and later filed an application under Section 147 BNSS for …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection against threats and harassment. The respondents opposed the prayer. The Court …
Abu Bakar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 66 of 2026) where he was charged under IPC sections 109(1), 352, 351(2) and sections 9 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Abu Ovaida, had already been released on bail in a similar case by a coordinate bench, and that …
The petitioner filed a writ under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi, to decide a Hindu marriage petition pending since 2021 under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner argued that the case had been unduly delayed. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Smt. Sharda Verma, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking the High Court's intervention to expedite the hearing of her matrimonial case (No. 2301/2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (S.D.), Kanpur Nagar, which involves claims under …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but the parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement, which was verified on 11 May 2026. The court, noting the settlement, ordered the trial court to consider any application under Section 320 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tiya Sharma in an NDPS case (Crime No. 297 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 8, 22, 29 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The applicant asserted complete innocence, stating that no contraband was …
The applicant, Saddam, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had no criminal history. He had been in custody since 15 …
Ritik Kumar Chohan applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 415 of 2026, charged under several IPC sections (318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 317(2) BNS) and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act, relating to transactions of Rs.13,000. The court noted that no FIR had been lodged against the applicant …
The applicant Mohit Tiwari filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31830 of 2026) seeking release pending trial in Crime No. 194 of 2026, which involves offences under IPC sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2). He asserted that he is innocent, was not named in the …
Vijay Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 372 of 2026) under Sections 8, 20 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The High Court considered the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Manoj Kumar, had already been granted bail …
The applicant, Gulshan Chandra, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 05 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the IPC and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day after the incident and that the injuries to the victim were simple. The …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Subedar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant, a 70‑year‑old illiterate man, claimed he was falsely implicated, had no involvement in the alleged …
Manvendra Singh, the driver of a D.C.M. vehicle from which urea was seized, was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Trade Marks Act and the Essential Commodities Act. He pleaded that he had no knowledge of the contraband and had no prior criminal record. The High Court …
The petitioners, fifty teachers serving as In‑charge Headmasters, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay them the salary and arrears due under a Government Order dated 16‑07‑2026. They alleged that despite several representations to the competent authority, no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Kumar in Criminal Case No. 313 of 2026, which alleged his involvement in extortion and impersonation of a police inspector under IPC sections 115, 127, 308 and 351. The applicant pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and lack of any …
Ajay Kumar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR dated 23.08.2026 that gave rise to Case Crime No.0132 of 2026 under sections 125, 351(3) and 352 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. During the hearing the petitioner limited his relief to protection under section …
Amit Kumar Maurya filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the licensing authority to transfer an arms licence, originally issued to his deceased father, to him under Rule 25(1)(b) of the Arms Rules, 2016. The Court examined whether the petitioner was entitled to inherit the licence and …
The applicant, Arun @ Pavan Shivhare, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No. 351 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaunpur, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6‑C) in Suit No. 193 of 2026. The petition argued that the injunction application had been left undecided for an …
Smt Damyanti filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Nagar Ayukt, Bareilly to release her first ACP and service arrears from 2022 and to decide a representation dated 17‑02‑2026. The respondents argued that the grievance should be addressed by the Nagar Ayukt itself and did not oppose a …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) to decide a pending stay application (I.A. No. 2045 of 2026) and the underlying securitisation application (No. 625 of 2025) on an expedited …
The petitioner, M/s R.K. Contractor and Supplier, challenged a recovery certificate issued under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 after an award dated 27-03-2024 directed payment of Rs.10,91,216 to the deceased worker's mother and authorized the insurer to recover the amount from the …
Indravati, the defendant, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division)-Vth, Jaunpur to decide Misc. Case No.115 of 2013 expeditiously. The petition arose from an ex-parte decree against her in the original suit. The High Court observed that …
The petitioner, Om Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No.06, Muzaffarnagar, to decide Civil Revision No.97 of 2025, which had been pending for over a year despite dates being fixed. The petitioner argued that the delay served no …
Petitioner Tasleem Ahmad, a retired Class‑IV employee, challenged a monthly pension deduction of Rs 5,000 and an audit report (Audit No. 33) that purportedly sought recovery of Rs 2,95,365, alleging no competent authority had authorized such actions. He sought certiorari to quash the audit report …
The petitioner, Gopal Ji, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. to consider and decide his representation dated 16‑08‑2026 for a scribe and compensatory time facility in the upcoming Assistant Professor examination on 18‑09‑2026. He had previously obtained a similar …
The petitioner, Devnath Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking an order directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Ghazipur to decide Original Suit No. 90 of 2016 expeditiously. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in High Court Bar Association v. State of …
The petitioner, Indar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Gorakhpur to dispose of a temporary injunction application filed on 23.05.2026 under Order 39, Rules 1‑2 of the CPC and the Specific Relief Act. The petitioner relied on the …
The petitioners, Sonal Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents and their family members not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and an application for …
Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of U.P. and other respondents to decide an objection dated 09-08-2026 that was pending before the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, Agra Region. The petitioners argued that the objection had remained unresolved and …
The petitioner sought an early decision in Execution Case No.13 of 2023, which remained pending after a decree was passed in 1998 and subsequent appeals were dismissed. The petition relied on recent Supreme Court pronouncements emphasizing the need to avoid inordinate delays in execution …
Fariyad Ali filed a writ petition alleging that a labour court award dated 31-08-2024 had not been executed and the awarded amount had not been recovered from respondents 4 and 5, despite the award being communicated to the District Magistrate, Alipur. The petitioner sought the court's intervention …
Petitioner Uma Shankar Rai filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2350 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Meera Rai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2377 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
The petitioner, Uma Shankar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haveli, Azamgarh, to decide a pending temporary injunction application (6-C2) in Suit No. 2581 of 2025. The petitioner argued that the injunction application had remained …
Shervani Industrial Syndicate Ltd filed a writ petition against the Executive Engineer of Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, contending that certain material facts could not be incorporated in the petition. The petitioner sought dismissal of the writ on the ground that it was not pressed with …
Manish Kumar applied for the post of Regional Inspector (Technical) where the advertisement required a valid heavy motor vehicle licence. He possessed only a learner's licence at the time of filing and later obtained a permanent licence after the application deadline, leading to the cancellation of …
Shivshankar Sahani was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he abused and maltreated his wife and three children, leading them to ingest organophosphorous poison, resulting in the death of two children. The primary informant turned hostile before trial, and the applicant has no prior …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.240 of 2017, which involved offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which was verified by the …
The applicants, Ramod Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26085 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. Instead of contesting the merits, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of criminal proceedings after the parties settled their dispute amicably and the compromise was verified by the trial court. The trial court confirmed the settlement on 25 June 2025. Both the State and the second opposite …
The appellants were summoned under several IPC offences and Sections 3(1)(Da) and 3(1)(Dha) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act based on a complaint alleging forced removal of a combine, loss of crop, and assault with caste‑based insults. The appellants …
The petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 25861 of 2025 in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
The appellant Jyoti Devi challenged the charge-sheet and the summoning order issued by the Additional Session Judge in a case under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the medical injury report was prepared 16 days after the incident, rendering the …
Vishal Khurana filed an application under Section 528 of the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 424 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 687 of 2024, which were based on a charge‑sheet filed under several provisions of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, …
Shiv Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 321 of 2025) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 105, 115(2), 352, 85 and 351(2). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating his wife fell from a terrace due to a slip, and that he had no prior criminal record and had …
The applicant, Mangesh Tyagi, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the BNSS. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Shyam Dhar Yadav, on behalf of Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, sought to withdraw the application, stating it was not pressed. The opposing party, represented by G.A., raised no …
