Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 13201–13400
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Deputy Director of the Local Fund Audit Department, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 03‑09‑2025 in Writ Petition No.13077 of 2025. The order was served on 13‑10‑2025 but …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 14‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17021 of 2025. The order was served on the opposite parties on 01‑12‑2025, but they failed to …
Dr. Jyoti Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to release his gratuity of Rs. 22,60,144 (or a maximum of Rs. 20,00,000) and to pay interest on the delayed payment, as well as to consider his representations dated 11-03-2026 and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Sadar Jaunpur to decide a restoration application dated 14‑06‑2019, which had remained pending since 2025 despite several dates being fixed. The petition alleged undue delay and prayed for an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Officer, to decide a land dispute case (No.3540 of 2017) pending under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They argued that the proceedings had been pending since 2017 and that the …
Petitioners Sakshi Chaurasia and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection for their life and liberty. The petition also requested liberty to file a fresh …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed an application (6-C) seeking expeditious disposal after only one date was fixed post‑institution of the suit. The petitioner also noted that objections to the injunction application had not been filed despite the filing of a written statement. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Awadhesh Narayan Shukla, a retired employee of Nagar Palika Parishad, Padrauna, claimed that his gratuity of approximately Rs.11 lakhs, due upon retirement in 2023, had not been paid. He filed a writ petition seeking direction for payment of the pending gratuity. The respondents, …
The petitioners sought a mandamus directing the Engineer‑in‑Chief (Mechanical) of the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation and Water Resources Department to consider their promotion to Junior Engineer (Mechanical) under the 10% quota as per Rule 5(3) read with Rule 8 of the 1992 Service Rules. An earlier writ …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nitesh Singh, who is accused in Crime No. 362 of 2025 under Sections 87, 137(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the alleged victim voluntarily left her parental home and later returned, and that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to decide Revision No.2981 of 2019, which had been pending since 2019 and repeatedly adjourned. The petitioners argued that the delay was unnecessary and prejudicial. The High Court examined whether it could intervene to …
The petitioner, Mohd. Irshad, challenged an externment order dated 29‑12‑2025 issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Firozabad under Sections 3(3)(1) and 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He filed an appeal before the Commissioner, Agra Division under Section 6 of the same …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove unauthorized encroachments on public utility land in Tambeen village, Chitrakoot district. The court noted a preliminary objection that the petitioner could instead file an application …
The petitioner, Basu Dev Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to pay interest on his General Provident Fund (GPF) amount, interest on Rashikaran, and his pending salary. He alleged that despite repeated requests, the interest on …
Petitioner Rajaram, a former Shiksha Mitra who retired at the age of 60, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Order dated 17‑02‑2023 that fixed the retirement age for Shiksha Mitras at 60 years. He argued that the order was arbitrary because the retirement age for regularly appointed …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit (also known as Nikhil), who was arrested under sections 65(1), 351(2), 352, 131 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for an alleged sexual offence involving a 15‑year‑old girl. The defence argued that the …
The petitioners, Ram Kumar Yadav and 13 others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Union of India and four others. The petition was heard by Justice Saurabh Shyam Shamshery. The court, without examining the merits, disposed of the petition by referring to the order in …
In 2002 the writ court issued a status‑quo order in a land dispute. In 2026 the respondents filed a contempt application alleging that the order had been violated and that they had been dispossessed of the land. The High Court examined whether there was any specific finding showing a breach of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Navratan Rajbhar, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court considered …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mithun, accused in Crime No. 233 of 2025 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110 and 105. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that the principal offender was the co‑accused Reeta Devi, who allegedly caused the fatal head …
The applicant, Gaurav, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, highlighted that he was already on …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar of Tamkuhiraj Tehsil to decide a pending revenue case (Case No. 1219/2024) under Section 35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged undue delay despite several dates being fixed. The Court, after hearing …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused Sanjay @ Pintu, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant’s counsel contended that he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ashish, who was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he threw his step‑children into a drain, though no serious injury was reported. The applicant claimed innocence …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Girish, who was named in an FIR for the murder of a deceased person, alleged to have been caused by strangulation after a scuffle. The applicant argued that no specific incriminating material linked him to the crime, that video footage …
The petitioner, Vijay Pal Singh, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the respondents to grant him post‑retirement benefits, assured career progression, and to refund an amount recovered between 1 April 2001 and 29 September 2003. The petitioner later clarified that the refund prayer …
The applicant, Sanjai Kumar Pandey, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Dileep Srivastava, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 15‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No.7776 of 2025. The order was personally served on 26‑12‑2025 but …
The petitioner, Smt. Shachi Jain, filed a writ petition which the court found to be not pressed. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested dismissal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court granted this prayer, dismissing the petition as not pressed and allowing the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sameer, who was arrested in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 0452 of 2022) for allegedly possessing 200 g of alprazolam. The applicant contended that he was falsely …
The applicants, Ashok and eight others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 30‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 09‑04‑2025 in State v. Sandeep Kumar (Case No. 946 of 2025) relating to offences under various IPC sections. …
Alok Kumar filed a contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Lal Bahadur, informed the court that the applicant was not pressing the application. The court took this statement as an indication that the application was not being pursued. …
Pappu filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide an interim application dated 04‑04‑2026 in Appeal No.112 of 2018 (Budhiraji v. Mannuram). The petitioner alleged that despite several dates being fixed, the interim application remained …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Maurya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, asserted that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kunal Yadav, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑crime case involving alleged receipt of illicit funds and offences under Sections 318(2), 319(2), 338(3), 3(5) …
The applicant, husband of a woman who died by hanging within two and a half years of marriage, sought bail in a case filed under Section 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code (dowry death) along with Sections 85, 115(2) IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamal, accused in a murder case (Crime No. 490 of 2025) under Sections 103(1) and 238(A) of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out the absence of any weapon, incriminating material, or eyewitness testimony linking …
Mohammad Parvez filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court, with Shahbaz Hassan and Zawwar Haider Naqvi appearing for him. The State of U.P. opposed the bail, represented by G.A. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant announced his intention to withdraw …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Meghshyam, husband of a woman who died by hanging, in Criminal Case No. 673 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 108(1) and 85 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, pointing to a four‑day delay in lodging the FIR and the …
Naresh was arrested in connection with a criminal case (Crime No.17 of 2026) involving alleged firearm injuries under several sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role in the alleged injury, and that a co‑accused, Vipin, …
Ramkumar, an accused, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed his application for discharge in a criminal case under IPC sections 419, 420, 468 and 471. The High Court examined whether it could entertain …
The applicants, Akash and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 16‑06‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Mainpuri, in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 504 IPC and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking a direction to the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Pilibhit to promptly decide a discharge application dated 28‑01‑2026 in Session Trial No.1461 of 2025. The discharge application pertained to charges under Sections 131, 118(1), …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Babloo Rathore, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …
The petitioners, Jitendra Kushvaha and another, filed a criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 06.03.2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, E.C. Act) in Sessions Trial No.652 of 2025, which had rejected their discharge application under Section 250 of the B.N.S.S. The …
The petitioner, Shiv Pujan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Shahganj, to decide a restoration application pending since August 2025 under sections 209h and 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that multiple dates had been fixed but …
The applicant, Usman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging offences under various sections of the B.N.S. and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. He claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and pointed to the grant of …
The applicant Gulista applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case under Sections 8, 21, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act, where she was named only in the confessional statement of a co‑accused and no contraband was recovered from her. The State opposed the bail, arguing the …
Kuldeep, the owner of a vehicle (HR626544) that was allegedly used by a third party, Sant Lal, to transport bovines, faced potential arrest under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. He filed an anticipatory …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nageshwar Mandal, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged withdrawal of Rs. 8,38,402. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and …
The applicant, Vivek Kumar, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 12 of 2025) involving alleged offences under several sections of the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was falsely …
The petitioners, a group of retired assistant teachers, filed a writ petition seeking gratuity, pension and related benefits after retiring at the age of 62. They relied on a prior judgment of this Court but failed to cite the specific provisions supporting their claim. The earlier writ petition …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the counsel for the applicants requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered the request and found no merit in proceeding with …
Ankit Yadav applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 534 of 2025 under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant was not named in the FIR; the only allegation against him arose from statements of a garage owner and a painter, linking him to the co‑accused Sujit Yadav who was driving the car …
The applicant, Mayank @ Sachin Bhardwaj, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while trial proceeds for an offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …
The accused, Kamal Kumar Tharad, filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau, which dismissed his application for discharge and framed charges under Sections 419, 420 and 406 of the IPC. The High Court examined whether it could …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass them and interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the present petition and obtain liberty to file a fresh petition. The …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing certain respondents to protect their land (Gata No. 33) in Kaushambi district and to stop illegal construction by other respondents. The court observed that the dispute was essentially between private parties and not a matter of …
M/S Shikhar Print‑N‑Packs filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State, through its standing counsel, raised a preliminary objection that the Central Government had already constituted the GST Appellate Tribunal and, under Section 111 of the GST Act, issued …
The appellant, Rakesh Kumar Yadav, appealed an ex parte injunction granted under Order 39 Rule 1 of the CPC in the original suit No. 135 of 2025 filed by Smt. Sirtaji Devi. He had filed his written statement on 11 April 2025, indicating knowledge of the suit, and later filed a writ petition under …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 28‑08‑2023 in Writ Petition No.1984 of 2023. The order was served on the opposite party on 22‑09‑2023, but compliance was not forthcoming. …
The petitioner, Baburam, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Board of Revenue (respondent No.1) to decide Revision No. 1752 of 2023 within a fixed time. The revision arose from an order by the Additional Commissioner, Meerut Division, dismissing a first appeal on the ground of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 27‑02‑2026 in Complaint Case No. 3308 of 2025, which was filed under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 74 of the B.N.S. The complaint alleged a cognizable offence and was supported by …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Additional Chief Secretary Deepak Kumar, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 15 July 2025 (corrected 9 September 2025) in Writ Petition No. 9604 of 2025. The …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Deepak Kumar, willfully disobeyed the High Court’s order dated 16 July 2025 in Writ Petition No.9694 of 2025. The order had been served on the opposite party on …
Sunita and three others filed an application under Section 91 of the BNSS seeking to quash a March 20, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, which had rejected their bail‑bond request in a criminal case involving offences under IPC sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 308. The applicants …
The applicant, Ram Bilas Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking punishment of the opposite party, District Magistrate Manish Kumar Verma, for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 04‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.11355 of 2025. The court noted …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the Court's order dated 15 July 2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.21107 of 2025. The order was served on 24 July 2025, but the opposite party failed to …
The applicant, Chandra Mohan Singhal, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Dr. Ashish Kumar Goel, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 24‑04‑2025 in Writ Petition No.14119 of 2024. The order was served on the opposite party on …
The applicant, Netrapal, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Sub‑Divisional Magistrate Rajesh Shukl for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court’s judgment and order dated 08‑07‑2025 in Writ Petition No.18022 of 2025. The order was personally …
Kunwar Avnindra Dutt filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court against Sri Satyendra Kumar, District Magistrate, and two others. The applicant alleged that the respondents had committed contempt of court. The court examined the material placed before it and concluded that no …
The applicant filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the judgment and order dated 28‑05‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 17707 of 2025. The order was personally served on the opposite party on 24‑02‑2026, but no …
The applicant, Mata Prasad, filed Original Suit No.1 of 1999 in which a temporary injunction was granted on 29 January 1999. The suit remains pending and the applicant alleges that the opposite parties, Sri Satyendra Kumar and two others, have violated the injunction. The applicant then filed a …
The High Court of Allahabad heard a civil contempt application filed by M/s Landmark Infra Project through its proprietor Naresh Kumar and another against Vavin Mishra, a District Panchayat Raj Officer. The applicant alleged that the opposite party had failed to comply with a writ court order …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Batham, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Raj Kumar Pandit for allegedly willfully disobeying the High Court's order dated 11‑12‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 18729 of 2025. The order was served to the opposite party on …
Anita Mishra filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that Saurabh Kumar Pandey willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 03.11.2025 in Writ Petition No.15906 of 2025. The order had been personally served on the opposite party on 17.11.2025, but …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party, Sub Divisional Magistrate Kunal Gaurav, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 07‑11‑2025 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 38485 of 2025. The order was personally served on …
The applicant, Shashi Kapoor, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Ramesh Babu Gupta, willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 21‑01‑2026 in Writ Petition No. 664 of 2026. The order was served on 02‑02‑2026, but the opposite party …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohan Singh, who is the father‑in‑law of a woman who allegedly committed suicide within six months of marriage. The applicant claimed the allegations against him were false, that the deceased had an illicit relationship, and that …
Nahar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 1757 of 2023) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque. He argued that the dispute was essentially a money dispute and could be settled amicably …
The petitioner, Uma Bhadauria, a qualified Assistant Teacher, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and the District Inspector of Schools, Etawah, to promote him to Lecturer in Civics and to consider his pending representations. He alleged that despite …
The applicant, Ramashish Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite parties willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 12‑12‑2024 in Writ Petition No.19320 of 2024. The court noted that the order had been served but not complied with, …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed a judgment dated 08.01.2026 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.19238 of 2024. The court noted that a prima facie case of contempt existed but declined to …
The applicant, Ram Ashish Ram, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the opposite party for willful disobedience of a judgment dated 11‑12‑2024 in Writ Petition No.19668 of 2024. The order was personally served on the opposite party on …
The applicants filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, alleging that the opposite party willfully disobeyed the High Court's order dated 13‑12‑2024 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.19335 of 2024. The order was served on the opposite party on 22‑01‑2025, but no …
Virendra Chauhan filed a PIL seeking a direction to the State of U.P. to enforce an order dated 5 June 2025, passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, for eviction of encroachers and recovery of damages. The petitioner argued that although the order was issued, no execution had been …
The applicant, Dinesh Singh, filed a contempt application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging that the opposite party, Sri Ashok Kumar Seth, willfully disobeyed a judgment and order dated 17‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No.17221 of 2025. The order was served on 04‑12‑2025, but the …
The petitioner, Smt. Vimlesh Devi, a widow, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent (a Gram Sabha) to decide a pending Second Appeal No. 375 of 2024, which had remained unadmitted for two years. The petitioner argued that the delay was unjustified and that the appeal needed to be …
The applicant, Naresh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application claiming that no charge-sheet had been filed and that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed, asserting that a charge-sheet had indeed been filed and highlighting the applicant's prior involvement in seven criminal cases. The …
Petitioner Aditya Prakash Diwakar filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his appeal pending before the Chairman of U.P. Power Corporation Ltd be decided within two months. The petitioner argued that the delay was prejudicial, while the respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, assured …
The petitioners, Smt Tanya Pathak and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and …
Manoj Kumar Maurya filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed by his brother Uttam Kumar Maurya. The applicant …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash a criminal proceeding arising from a Section 12 complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, filed by the respondent wife. The trial court had proceeded ex‑parte and ordered the applicants to pay …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 732 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that they were falsely implicated to further a …
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents 2‑5 to act against respondent 6 for an alleged illegal encroachment on a 386‑hectare plot in Azamgarh. The court noted that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, as …
Barun Kishor Shukla filed a writ petition challenging a minor disciplinary punishment imposed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petitioner argued that a statutory remedy exists under the Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited Establishment (Discipline and …
The applicant, Lakhan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wishes to pursue the bail application. The State's Additional Government Advocate expressed no objection to …
The petitioner, Mamta Chandel, filed Writ Petition No. 5538 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, Jitendra Singh, Satish Chandra Dubey, and Vimal Chandra Mishra, moved that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, seeking liberty to file a fresh …
M/S Indu Timber Products Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority raised a preliminary objection questioning the maintainability of the petition. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and summoning order in a criminal case, alleging false implication, absence of their names in the FIR, and lack of material evidence. The State opposed, arguing that the matter involved disputed facts …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and others not to harass or interfere with their peaceful marital life. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Nitish @ Shivendra, who was named as an accused in a suicide case under Section 306 IPC. The applicant argued that the allegations were false, that he had no prior criminal record, and that a charge‑sheet had …
The applicant, M/s Om Bhawan Nirman Samagri, filed an application under Section 529 seeking the court to direct the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in Mathura to decide a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (No. 1028 of 2024) within a stipulated period. The applicant …
The petitioner, Deependra Kumar, challenged a punishment order dated 07.02.2026 issued by the Deputy Police Commissioner, Agra. The court was informed that the petitioner could appeal the order under Rule 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment And Appeal) Rules, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to harass them and interfere with their peaceful marital life. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel indicated that they no longer wished to pursue the present petition and sought liberty to file a fresh …
The appellant, Smt. Ranjana Singh, the first wife of Rohit Singh, filed a suit under Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking to declare her husband's second marriage to a woman identified as "X" void. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that only a party to the second marriage could …
The applicant, Golu alias Ranveer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a session case involving alleged extortion, assault and other offences. He contended that the allegations were vague, that no substantive evidence linked him to the alleged …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the Consolidation authorities. While the petition was pending, the Consolidation authorities disposed of the underlying matter, rendering the relief sought by the petitioners unavailable. The petitioners, …
Petitioner Mazhar Hussain filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order dated 13 January 2026 passed by the Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (PC Act) in Bareilly, which had dismissed his application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. The revision sought to set …
The petitioner, Mayank Sonkar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The Court …
The petitioner, Narayan Das, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the Allahabad High Court, but the petitioner was not present while the State's counsel appeared. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an …
The applicant filed a bail cancellation application seeking to cancel the bail granted to the second opposite party, Beopal, in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. The application was pending since 2023. No counsel or parties appeared for either side when the matter was called, although …
The applicant, Smt. Mandavi Bajpeyi, filed a transfer application (Civil) No. 866 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant was listed but no representative appeared to press the application on the hearing date. The opposite party, Manish Kumar Deexit, was represented by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court observed that …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, …
Rakesk Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh, represented by the Advocate General, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had …
The petitioner, Dinesh Vishwakarma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State's counsel informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty …
The petitioner, Imran @ Bihari, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18671 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner's counsel was not present during the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The Court observed that the petition had become …
Hoti Lal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. Since the cognizance status was uncertain and an interim order was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 19‑07‑2021 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No.1944 of 2021, which involved offences under Sections 147, 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties jointly submitted that a compromise …
Petitioner Lalloo Pal challenged the dismissal of his complaint alleging that his father was abducted, confined for years, assaulted, and forced to sign loan documents. The complaint, filed under Sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC, was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naushad, who is charged under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the same Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act for an alleged cyber‑fraud involving …
Petitioner Waqar Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court …
A bail application was filed in the Allahabad High Court by Aasey @ Aaseyram (the applicant) against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Madan Singh, informed the court that the applicant had died. The court held that the death of the applicant rendered the …
Rohit Garg was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 64(2)(i) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging sexual offences against a 16‑year‑old girl. The applicant contended that the alleged victim had given consent, as reflected in her statement recorded under Section 183 …
Gopal, a 20‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with a case (Crim. No. 316 of 2024) alleging offences under the IPC, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act, the alleged victim being a 14‑year‑old girl. Gopal contended that the relationship was consensual, citing the victim’s statement recorded under …
Jaypal was arrested in connection with a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the POCSO Act. The victim, who had initially testified, turned hostile during trial, undermining the prosecution's case. The applicant pleaded innocence, asserted no prior criminal record, and argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arshad alias Irshad, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 64, 351(2) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly establishing a sexual relationship with a 21‑year‑old woman under a false promise of marriage and subsequently aborting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Veer Bahadur, who was in custody since 19 April 2025 for offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 351(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Pramod Kumar Rajpoot, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim was a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Arun Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under Section 70(2) of the BNS Act, Sections 5g/6 of the POCSO Act and several provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, arguing that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil, who was arrested on 18 April 2025 in connection with a case under Sections 137(2), 351(2), 64 of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim was a consenting party …
The petitioner, Banti Sikarwar, filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 16‑04‑2025 that gave rise to Crime No. 55 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent‑4 submitted a short counter‑affidavit stating that the parties had reached an …
The applicant, Babloo, was arrested for alleged assault and sexual assault under several IPC sections after an incident on 7 December 2024. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was filed a day late and that the victim’s allegations of rape were added later without medical corroboration. The …
Smt. Rukhsar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as indicated by a report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of …
The Allahabad High Court dealt with two writ petitions concerning the Shri Harihar Sanskrit Pathshala Society, which is governed by the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The Assistant Registrar had earlier, on 2 December 2023, finalized a list of eleven general‑body members and rejected the claim of …
The petitioner, Nadeem Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The …
Dr. Sumit Singh filed a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order dated 27‑05‑2024 that required him to pay Rs 10,000 per month to opposite party No.2 from the date of application and Rs 12,000 per month thereafter. The Family Court had found sufficient cause for opposite party No.2 to live …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ritik Kumar, who was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8/20) for alleged possession of 155 kg of ganja recovered from a co‑accused's house. The applicant claimed …
Smt Sangeeta and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State of U.P. submitted that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The petitioners argued that without cognizance they should not …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 20 June 2025 that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code arising from a matrimonial dispute. The High Court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre, where the parties eventually entered …
The applicant, Tejveer alias Bhoola, sought bail in a criminal case under Sections 64, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for alleged extortion and distribution of indecent photographs. The applicant's counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 994 of 2022) arising from an FIR alleging assault and threats while erecting an electric pole. They contended that the FIR was fabricated, there was no injury to the complainant, and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3001 of 2021) instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh against Kishan Kumar Saini under Sections 354A and 504 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise, …
The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Babulal and ten others seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the entire criminal proceedings against them. The applicants, not pressing any substantive relief, requested that the court direct them to surrender …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jitendra @ Jitu, who was charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly possessing 34.5 kg of ganja. The …
The accused filed a revision petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging a July 1, 2025 order of the Judicial Magistrate, Meerut that dismissed their discharge application under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC …
The petitioner, Vikas Mani Tripathi, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State authorities (respondents 2 and 3) to consider and decide two applications dated 20‑08‑2020 and 02‑02‑2021, which sought implementation of a prior judgment dated 12‑04‑2019 in Writ‑C No. 7582 of 1996 …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking the court's direction for early disposal of a criminal trial (Case No. 73735 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 380, 411 and 457 of the IPC. The trial court had recorded the examination‑in‑chief of witness Anil Kumar on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 9 July 2024 and the entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1771 of 2021 (State v. Virendra and others) relating to offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 IPC. Both the applicants …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the Director General of Police's Legal Cell, submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The …
The petitioners, Saniya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report …
The petitioners, Shivam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed …
The petitioner Avdesh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was heard in the revised list before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, with no petitioner present and the State represented by an AGA. The court examined …
Smt. Srishti and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State of U.P. submitted a charge‑sheet, and the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police reported that the charge‑sheet had been filed. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 13113 of 2025 (State v. Kamlesh Ojha et al.) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506 and 308. The parties had entered into a compromise on 29 July 2025, which was verified by …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, U.P. The Court …
The petitioners Suhail Ahmad and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the …
The petitioners, Manish Kashyap and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, through the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026 from the Director General of …
Anurag Tiwari filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against him. The High Court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court held that once a charge‑sheet is filed, a writ petition seeking to quash the …
The petitioners, Vinay @ Vinesh Kumar and eight others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the …
A juvenile petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed, as per a report dated 16‑04‑2026. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18568 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Ajay Kumar, was not present, and no interim relief had been granted. The court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred, rendering the petition …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court noted that …
The petitioners, Noor Hasan and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the …
The petitioner, Smt. Mamta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that the filing of …
Petitioners Priya Shukla and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the …
Prem Shankar Sharma filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18660 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Kumar Sharma, but he was not present on the hearing …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed in the matter. The Court …
The petitioners, Abhilakh Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16‑April‑2026 indicating that the …
Vikas Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against him. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet in the matter, as indicated by the report from the Director General of Police, U.P. The …
Petitioners Shyam Tiwari and six others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18842 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Counsel for the petitioners, Prashant Shukla, was not present before the bench. No interim order …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, yet it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the …
The petitioners, Santosh Varma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a charge-sheet had already been filed, as per a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State submitted a report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The Court examined whether a writ petition questioning the FIR could be entertained after the …
Petitioners Prabhakar Tripathi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners did not appear before the High Court. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered against them. The State submitted a charge‑sheet, as reflected in a report dated 16 April 2026. The petition sought to quash the FIR after the charge‑sheet had been filed. The Court observed that once a …
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court examined a report dated 16‑04‑2026 indicating …
Usman filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's AGA was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet in the case had already been filed, …
The petitioners, Smt. Ranviri and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court noted …
The petitioner, Rajwant Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar …
The petitioners Shailendra Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report dated 16 April 2026 indicating that the charge-sheet …
The petitioners sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the petition. The dismissal was based on …
The petitioners, Firoz Ahmad and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. …
Smt. Prabha Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18572 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and seven others. The petition sought relief, but the petitioner's counsel was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. …
Petitioners Badan Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. The Court …
A writ petition was filed by Aman Kumar, a minor, challenging his potential arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State was represented by three advocates. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken …
The petitioners, Rajan Saini and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge-sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, …
The petitioners, including Aditya Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners argued that without cognizance, they could be …
The petitioner, Taufiq, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging his potential arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty regarding cognizance and, …
The petitioners, Rinkupal @ Rinku and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief after mediation between them and the State of U.P. and three others failed. The court noted that mediation had indeed broken down. No counsel appeared on …
Petitioners Mahbish and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the uncertainty …
