Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
15781 judgments · newest first · showing 15601–15781
The appellants Narad Singh and Brahmdeo Singh were convicted under sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder the informant Ram Asrey Singh, who was injured during an altercation in 1979. The trial court sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the …
The police intercepted a vehicle driven by Bhure @ Surendra Gupta on 28 May 2014 and recovered 54 packets containing 27 kg of charas concealed under the rear seat. The accused was arrested, and the seized contraband was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, where it was confirmed as charas with …
The petitioners filed Writ A No. 24911 of 2018 in the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, through counsel, they expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and submitted an application to withdraw it. The court considered the withdrawal request and, finding no objection, dismissed …
The applicant, Naresh Singh, filed a bail cancellation application in the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicant argued that the trial court had already scheduled the case for judgment, rendering the bail cancellation application unnecessary. The court considered whether the application was …
M/S Anand Tyre House filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not been constituted, preventing it from filing an appeal under sections 107 or 108 of the GST Act. The Court noted that the Central Government had subsequently …
M/S Anand Tyre House filed a writ petition challenging the non‑existence of a GST Appellate Tribunal for filing an appeal under sections 107/108 of the GST Act. The Court noted that the Central Government had subsequently constituted the Tribunal and issued procedural rules under section 111. The …
The petitioners filed a contempt application in the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned" and a notice was posted stating that such matters must be decided in the first round. The petitioner's counsel, Y.K. Mishra, was not present and no …
Girija Shankar Shukla filed a civil contempt application against Shri Durgesh Yadav, Secretary of Gram Panchayat Pratapgarh. The petitioner did not appear before the court, while the State’s standing counsel was present. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the petition had become …
The revisionist, Mohammad Irfan Rasool, filed a civil revision before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the Uttar Pradesh Waqf Tribunal, Lucknow. No counsel appeared on behalf of the revisionist on the scheduled date. The opposite party was represented by counsel, including Shri Yusuf …
The appellant Ram Murut was convicted by a Special Judge under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for possessing large quantities of food grains without a licence and was sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He was granted bail in 1988 but later absconded; his sureties have …
Munni Devi filed a criminal complaint alleging that six accused forcibly entered her house, assaulted her husband and daughter with lathis, hurled abuses and threatened to kill, invoking sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The trial court recorded statements under sections 200 and 202 CrPC and …
An FIR was lodged on 12 July 2024 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). After the initial charge‑sheet, the accused filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC (175(3) BNSS) seeking further investigation, prompting the magistrate to order collection of medical records. The …
Shiv Kumar Agrawal filed an application under Section 528 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Allahabad High Court. The State of U.P. and another respondent sought a one‑week extension to file a counter‑affidavit, with a further week for any rejoinder. The Court, after hearing counsel, …
The applicant sought special leave to appeal a judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate that dismissed a criminal complaint alleging conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and offences under Sections 418, 419, 420 and 120B IPC in a land‑title dispute. The dispute concerned Plot No.6/51 …
Anupam Kumar Mishra and others filed a contempt application alleging that Anil Kumar Verma, District Basic Education Officer, Mirzapur, had failed to comply with a writ Court order. The respondent submitted an affidavit stating that the order had been complied with. The applicant's counsel did not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal case (Cr. No. 6041 of 2017) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 427, 452 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a verified compromise, which was …
Rashid Siddiqui, who has been granted anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC, applied for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to renew his passport for Hajj and Umrah. The Special Judge rejected the NOC on the ground that his bail …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) heard an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by T.T. Ltd. Through Occupier and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No representative of the applicant appeared to press the application, nor was …
The appellant, Smt. Gudiya and others, filed a first appeal against order No. 273 of 2019. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellants to pursue the appeal, nor was any request for adjournment made. The High Court observed that the appeal could not be prosecuted due to the lack of …
Ishraq Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the petition. The Court held that a writ petition cannot …
The petitioners, Addya Prasad Pandey and others, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 184 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was filed in 2021 but the hearing took place on December 1, 2025. No counsel or party appeared on the day of hearing, and no engagement, …
A writ petition was filed by Ram Naresh seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The High Court, noting the lack of prosecution, dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the …
The petitioners failed to appear before the High Court to prosecute their writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000 to be deposited in the High Court Legal Services Committee account. The Court directed that the petition may …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad but no counsel appeared on their behalf to prosecute the case. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs. 1000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court but no counsel appeared on their behalf to prosecute the case. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioners to pay a cost of Rs. 1,000 to the High Court Legal Services Committee. The order …
The appellant, a fertilizer dealer, was convicted by a Special Judge under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for failing to maintain a proper stock register and for discrepancies in fertilizer stock. The trial court sentenced him to nine months' rigorous imprisonment and a Rs.3,000 …
A writ petition was filed by Hansa and others against the Assistant Director of Consolidation, Deoria. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to prosecute the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 to be deposited in the High Court …
The appellant Babu, convicted in 1981 for offences under IPC sections 147, 365/149 and 304(II)/149, appealed the judgment. He was granted bail in 1982 but subsequently absconded and could not be located despite multiple non‑bailable and bailable warrant attempts. The High Court considered whether it …
A writ petition (Writ‑B No. 11417 of 1983) was filed by Nazir Mohammed and others against the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gorakhpur and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to press the petition. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered a cost of Rs. 1000 …
An FIR was lodged against five accused for offences under Sections 147, 307/149 and 323/149 of the IPC. The Special & Additional Sessions Judge convicted them in 1983, sentencing them to five years rigorous imprisonment for Section 307/149 and six months for Section 147, to run concurrently. The …
The petitioner, Ravi Prakash Sahu, applied for a further adjournment to prepare his case. The learned counsel, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, requested the court to grant the adjournment. The High Court, presided over by Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, entertained the request and ordered that the matter …
The appellants were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 147, 323, 325, 352, 504 and 506 of the IPC, arising from a violent incident during Holi in 1987. The appeal challenged only the sentence, not the merits of the conviction, seeking the benefit of Section 4 of the …
The petitioners Kalidas and three others filed a writ petition (WRIA No. 43100 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner No.1 died, necessitating a substitution application to replace the deceased with his legal heirs. The petitioners also filed a …
The appellant, Nidhi Chaudhary, married Vikas Chaudhary on 22 October 2023, which was a second marriage for both parties. The respondent alleged that the appellant's earlier marriage to Naru Gopal Singh had not been dissolved and obtained an ex‑parte judgment on 28 October 2024 declaring the …
The applicant, Rajesh Kumar Singh, son of the deceased director of Mahindra Machines Manufacturer Pvt. Ltd., sought to quash an order dated 29 June 2022 that had allowed the complainant to implead him as the new director in a cheque‑dishonour complaint. The complainant had filed the original …
The High Court considered a contempt application filed by Sarjoo Bai after a writ petition dated 19‑04‑2023 ordered payment of delayed gratuity with 8% interest from 02‑10‑2011. The respondents, represented by the U.P. Basic Education Board officials, filed compliance affidavits showing that the …
The applicants, Smt Kanchan Devi and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed repeatedly, but the applicants failed to appear on both occasions, and their counsel, J.S. Baghel, showed no interest in pursuing the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 by Shanoo, who was arrested in connection with a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged creation of a fraudulent UPI account and misappropriation of Rs.5,07,029. The FIR alleged that Shanoo, along with a co‑accused, …
Ramsurat Prasad filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The applicant questioned the initiation of an inquiry after a non‑cognizable offence was recorded in an FIR and sought clarification on how such an FIR could be registered as a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2016 seeking relief against the State of U.P. The application remained pending for several years. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the State's counsel was present. The High Court observed …
The applicant, Jugul Kishore, filed a civil contempt application (No. 627 of 2017) before the Allahabad High Court seeking to enforce a notice that matters listed as 'These matters shall not be adjourned' must be decided in the first round without revision. The court had posted a notice outside the …
The appellants Sant Lal, Banaspati Singh and Ram Lal Mishra were convicted under Section 395 IPC for a dacoity in 1981 and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. The appeal, filed in 1983, remained pending for decades; Sant Lal died, Ram Lal Mishra completed his sentence and was released, …
The appellant Nanoo, who was granted bail in 1988, failed to appear before the Allahabad High Court despite multiple non‑bailable warrants and notices to his sureties under Section 446 Cr.P.C. The Court considered whether it must keep adjourning the appeal until the appellant is produced. Relying on …
The appellant, a fair‑price shop dealer, was caught transporting 90 kg of sugar for sale in the black market, violating the Essential Commodities Act and state sugar‑control orders. The Special Judge convicted him under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced him to two years’ …
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Chaturvedi filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The Court heard the counsel for both parties and issued procedural directions. It ordered that a notice be issued to respondent‑6 and that the notice be …
The petitioner, Jhallu Lal, whose land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), received compensation but not the rehabilitation and resettlement award mandated by the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
Manish Kumar was arrested on 17 October 2024 after police claimed to have recovered 614 grams of heroin (smack) from his vehicle. He filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the CrPC, alleging that the recovery was fabricated due to a personal dispute between his father and a man named …
The applicant, Ghanendra Patel, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking an adjournment because his counsel, Ram Surat Patel, suffered a leg fracture and could not appear. The State of U.P. opposed the request. The court considered the medical condition of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for an accused charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 2.39 kg of charas, which exceeds the commercial quantity. The prosecution argued that the accused was caught red‑handed …
The application was filed under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The matter was listed for revision. No applicant appeared before the court, though the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted the absence of the applicants and recorded the presence of counsel …
The appellants were convicted under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping a boy in 1982, based on eyewitness testimony and police investigation. The trial court sentenced Ram Autar to six years' rigorous imprisonment. In the appeal, the counsel argued that the incident occurred 44 …
Petitioner Raj Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition (WRIT-A No. 4463 of 2016) against Vc. Dr. Bheemrao Ambedkar Vishwavidyalaya and two other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, while the standing counsel for the State-respondent was present. The court …
The petitioner, Dukhbhanjan Prasad Jaiswal, filed a writ petition challenging the inability to appeal orders under sections 107 and 108 of the GST Act because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not been constituted under section 112. The High Court noted that the Central Government subsequently …
Dilshad filed a criminal revision challenging the dismissal of his application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. which alleged that Devendra Sharma had concealed the pendency of an execution suit while seeking enforcement of an ex‑parte decree. The revisionist contended that such concealment amounted to …
The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ravi Yadav under Section 483 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, seeking release pending trial in a case involving alleged arsenic poisoning. The applicant argued that the trial had been unduly delayed, that the charge sheet …
The applicant Rakesh Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 5615 of 2013) against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court observed the …
The applicants, Ram Vishal Tiwari and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 4638 of 2013) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the State was represented by its …
Sudheer Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 221 of 2017) seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The matter was listed before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, but the application remained pending for several years. The court …
The petitioners, Pratap Narain Gupta and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but they were not present in court. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, was present. The High Court observed that there was no …
The appellant Qamrul Islam was convicted under Section 304A IPC for the death of Indra Bahadur Singh, who was pushed by a constable and fell under the rear wheel of the appellant's truck. The prosecution alleged that the driver’s rash or negligent driving caused the death. Evidence showed the truck …
The applicant, Pappu alias Zakir, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The application was presented by counsel Ramesh Kumar Pandey. During the proceedings, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail application. The presiding …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 1824 of 2022 (Afreen Begum v. Mohd. Lukman) which alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 354 IPC. The complaint arose out of a property dispute and the magistrate had earlier rejected …
The applicants filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to quash the order dated 03‑02‑2025 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 115, 351(2) and 352 of the BNSS. The offences are non‑cognizable, and the police had filed a …
The applicants, Abhishek Mishra and another, were charged under IPC sections 363, 366 and 120B following an FIR lodged by Rajesh D. Souja on 1 March 2023. While the criminal case was pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, the parties, including the victim, entered into an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (C No. 3000056 of 1999) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. Counsel for the petitioners reported that despite extensive efforts, the petitioners could not be contacted. Consequently, the petitioners' counsel requested that the writ petition be …
A.R. Enterprises, through its proprietor, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The High Court …
The applicant, Jeevan Khanna, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court …
Shiv Raj Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and Section 528) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No representative of the applicant appeared before the court to press the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (and a reference to Section 528) seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the application. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The High Court dismissed the …
The petitioner, a Block Education Officer, was transferred multiple times and later suspended following show‑cause notices alleging illegal gratification and improper deductions from a composite grant. The petitioner challenged the suspension, claiming no misconduct and that the allegations were …
The petitioners, appointed as Urdu Translators‑cum‑Junior Clerks, were granted a third financial upgradation on 16‑02‑2024, which was later cancelled by an order dated 04‑12‑2025 issued by the District Development Officer, Bareilly, without any show‑cause notice. The petitioners challenged the …
Petitioner Smt. Meera Devi filed a writ petition before the High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, M.P. Srivastava, repeatedly submitted illness slips, the fifth being on 27 July 2018, prompting the court to list the matter peremptorily. Despite the peremptory listing, the counsel again sent an …
Petitioner Smt. Chanchal Kumari Sonkar filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner's counsel, Abhay Raj Yadav, requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered the request and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive factual or legal …
The Allahabad High Court examined a bail application filed under Section 483 of the CrPC on behalf of Manni Panchal, who was charged under Sections 8A(c), 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended that no narcotic substances were recovered from him, that the prosecution lacked a chemical …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. for Akash Sharma, who was charged with offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for alleged cyber‑fraud involving a loss of Rs 3.16 crore. The …
The applicant Ibran sought bail under Section 483 of the CrPC for a case registered under Sections 8 and 22 of the NDPS Act, where 17,760 capsules of a product called Spasmore weighing 9.768 kg were seized from his vehicle. The prosecution argued that the large quantity and lack of a licence …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of Dharmendra, who was charged in Crime No. 771 of 2025 for alleged possession of 470 g of Alprazolam, an offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act. The applicant’s …
In Criminal Revision No. 8241 of 2025, the revisionist Jitendra Pal Singh filed a revision before the Allahabad High Court. The opposite party filed a counter‑affidavit, which was taken on record. After hearing the counsel for both sides, the court granted the revisionist a two‑week period to file a …
Shiv Pratap Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 5689 of 2012) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The High Court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the matter had become infructuous and there was no longer any live cause of …
Suresh Kumar filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. The matter was listed as a case not to be adjourned, but the applicant failed to appear while the State's learned A.G.A. was present. The Court observed that, due to the …
Petitioner Harsukh Pal Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the Additional Chief Secretary for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation. Consequently, …
Ram Deen and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed as a non‑adjournable case, but the applicants did not appear. The court observed that, due to the passage of time, the application had become …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application before the court. The bench noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the application for want of …
Risal Singh filed a criminal appeal (No. 1490 of 2014) against the State of U.P. before the Allahabad High Court. The court observed that the appeal had already been declared abated by an order dated 11 December 2025, a fact that had not been reflected in the cause list. Consequently, the court …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Fiza and Muskan, accused under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was …
Kartar Singh filed a contempt application (civil) against Dr. Pratyush Kumar Singh, the Medical Superintendent of a Community Health Centre. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of prosecution of the application. …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, filed a civil contempt application (No. 375 of 2007) against Sri Nitin Ramesh Gokarn, Secretary, Information and Public Relations. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, although the Assistant Chief Secretary (ACSC) was present. The court noted the lack of …
M/S P P Supari Traders filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the non‑constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal for hearing appeals under sections 107 and 108 of the GST Act. The Court noted that the Central Government had subsequently constituted the Tribunal and issued …
M/S India Metal Steel filed Writ Tax No. 1033 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents. The petitioner was represented by counsel Praveen Kumar. No counsel or party appeared on the scheduled date for hearing. Consequently, …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition and later moved an application to implead the first informant as a respondent. The State, represented by the Advocate General, highlighted that another writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3547 of 2026, Mewati Devi v. State of U.P.) …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS 2023 seeking to quash the cognizance and summons order dated 27‑09‑2023 and the charge‑sheet dated 17‑09‑2022 in a case arising from NCR 117 of 2021 involving alleged offences under IPC 323 and 504. The court examined whether a …
The applicants, Nisha Singh and another, sought cancellation of the bail previously granted to the accused. The counsel highlighted that the trial was nearing the stage of recording statements under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the accused repeatedly sought adjournments, causing …
The applicant, Ashish Vats, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to argue the application, while counsel for the State was …
Wadood Ahmad filed a writ petition (No. 5036 of 2024) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging orders passed by the Additional District Judge/Ftc Pratapgarh and two other respondents. The petitioner failed to appear even after the court issued a revised call, indicating a lack of …
M/s Gopal Jee Namkeen filed a writ petition challenging the inability to appeal GST orders because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. The High Court noted that the Central Government subsequently constituted the Tribunal and issued procedural rules under Section 111 of the GST …
M/s Varun Beverages Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the inability to appeal orders under sections 107 or 108 of the GST Act because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. The Court noted that the Central Government subsequently constituted the …
The petitioners, a 20‑year‑old woman and a 19‑year‑old man, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection, alleging harassment by the woman's father. The State argued that the marriage was void or voidable under the …
The appellant Rishi Kumar Tripathi and others filed a first appeal against Order No. 70 of 2018. The appeal was listed for hearing, but a pass‑over slip was issued and the matter was transferred to the first round of hearing. When the revised list was prepared, none of the appellants appeared, …
Hemant Bahadur Singh filed a civil contempt application against Suraj Pratap, a Tehsildar of Amethi. The applicant's counsel, Ambika Prasad Mishra, was absent from the hearing and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the applicant's failure to prosecute the application. Consequently, …
The matter concerned a second appeal filed by Durga Prasad Poddar against Shri Hanuman Ji Maharaj Birajman Mandir and others. Counsel for both parties appeared before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appellant sought an adjournment to prepare the case. The court granted the adjournment …
A writ petition (C No. 38955 of 2008) was filed by Smt. Usha Kumari and others against the State of U.P. and others. The petitioners were represented by counsel K.K. Arora, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C., A.S. Rana and Madan Mohan. The case was listed before the Allahabad High …
The petitioner, M/s Saraswati Infosoft Technology Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later expressed that it was not inclined to pursue the writ. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The respondents, including the State …
Ramky Infrastructure Ltd entered into a service agreement with Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd on 18 September 2012 and completed the work, but the respondent has delayed payment of Rs. 462.85 crores. After repeated representations, Ramky issued a notice on 26 May 2022 invoking the arbitration …
The parties entered into an agreement on 11 August 2016 containing an arbitration clause. A dispute arose and the applicant invoked the clause by notice, but the parties could not agree on an arbitrator, prompting the applicant to seek appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 36984 of 2025) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, …
Petitioner Rais Ahmad, manager of Madarsa Rizviya Ahle Sunnat, filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel argued that the prayers in the petition were vague and requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, allowing …
Dr. Neeraj Chaubey filed a Special Appeal (No. 101 of 2007) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging a decision in Crl. Misc. Case No. 1880c/2002. The appellant appeared in person, but no response was filed on his behalf and no request for adjournment was made. The court observed …
A writ petition (Writ‑C No. 414 of 2026) was filed by Swarna Sharma and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners’ counsel did not appear at the hearing. Counsel for respondent No. 4, Ramesh Kumar Pandey, and the Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State were …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Harpreet @ Preet @ Jassi, who was arrested in Crime No. 539 of 2024 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, had no gang …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Chhojer Bharchin (alias Chanjan, Chocho, Chandra) who was in custody for offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and …
Petitioners Ashok Kumar Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was heard by a Division Bench comprising Justices Rajeev Misra and Lakshmi Kant Shukla, and a detailed judgment was initially dictated. However, the Court later …
The petitioners, Mudassar Husain and two others, filed a writ petition (WRIT C No. 3000220 of 2003) before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Collector, Bahraich, and two others. The petition was listed in the revised list, but no petitioner …
The respondents filed an application seeking substitution of respondent No.9 who had died. The petitioners did not raise any objection to the substitution. The court examined the application and, finding no opposition, allowed the substitution. It directed that the necessary substitution be effected …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 by Himanshu Chaudhary, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case involving alleged misuse of his bank accounts as a mule. The applicant argued that he is innocent, has no criminal antecedent, the investigation is …
The applicant Sujan Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 44389 of 2024) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The application was presented by counsel Ram Surat Patel and Satish Kumar Mishra. The opposite side, the State of U.P., was represented by G.A. The court, …
An application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code was filed by Saddam and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for the applicants were Arpita Singh and Diwan Saifullah Khan, while the State was represented by G.A. The applicants did not appear before the court. The learned …
Ram Briksha filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Collector, Gonda and others. The petition was listed but no further steps were taken to prosecute the case. The court noted the absence of any prosecution by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No hearing was conducted and the petitioners failed to prosecute the case. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No …
The petitioners sought to confirm their right over Plot No. 679, a piece of land historically held by Zamindars and later possessed by their father Malhoo for fifty years. Malhoo obtained a favorable order from the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 23‑08‑1972 directing the land to be recorded in …
The appellants, Amit Shukla and others, filed Special Appeal No. 401 of 2015 before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, challenging a decision of the State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Lucknow. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellants during the hearing. …
An application under contempt (civil) No. 4080 of 2024 was filed by Nirmala Kumari against Sri Sanjay Singh Managing Director, U.P. Krishi Anusandhan Parishad and another. The applicant's counsel, Ganga Singh, was not present in court and no request for adjournment was made on his behalf. The …
Ram Abhilakh filed a contempt application alleging that the order dated 27 July 2023 had not been complied with by Sri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, the Sub Divisional Magistrate. The State's standing counsel submitted that the order had been fully complied with and placed the compliance instructions on …
The revisionist Nabeel Alias Guddu challenged an order dated 12‑09‑2025 whereby the Special Judge summoned him under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC pursuant to an application under Section 319 of the CrPC. The revisionist argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the trial court relied on …
The petitioner, Kailash Shanker, challenged an order dated 21‑December‑1999 that reverted him from Assistant Accountant to Junior Clerk after a disciplinary enquiry. Earlier, a charge sheet had been issued without providing documentary evidence, and the enquiry officer failed to hold a hearing, …
The applicant, Pramod Kumar Tiwari, filed a civil contempt application before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Justice Manish Kumar. Neither of the applicant's counsels, Anand Mani Tripathi and Anurag Tripathi, appeared in court, and no request for adjournment was made …
The matter was a first appeal filed by Mrs. Uma Rawat and two others against an order dated 2024. The respondents were Mrs. Kanhaiya Lal Rawat and two others. Counsel for the appellant was Ms. Gayatri Singh and for the respondents were Dr. Shipra Tripathi, C.S.C., and Harshvardhan. No representative …
Vijay Bahadur Singh filed a civil contempt application against Sri Arvind Pandey, Deputy Director of Education. The applicant was represented by counsel Brijesh Kumar Mishra, but neither the counsel nor the applicant appeared before the court. No request for adjournment was made on their behalf. The …
M/S Mobcoder Technologies Pvt Ltd filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking enforcement of an arbitral award against M/S Lookman Electroplast Industries Ltd. The court, relying on an office report dated 2‑April‑2026, held that service of notice on …
The applicant, Bheem Singh, filed a civil contempt application against the Divisional Forest Officer, Harendra Kumar, alleging non‑compliance with an order granting a minimum pay‑scale of Rs.18,000. The Additional Advocate General informed the court that the DFO had already issued the order on 5 …
Om Prakash filed a contempt application against Manish Singh and others, alleging non‑compliance with a writ order dated 8 July 2025 that required extending a minimum pay‑scale to Rs. 18,000. The learned Standing Counsel informed the court that the opposite party had complied with the writ order. …
The petitioners, Ahmad Miyan and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from police action. The High Court granted an interim stay of arrest on 07.01.2026 and issued notice to the State and private respondents. Despite the stay, the petitioners reported that police from …
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed under Section 18 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities Prevention Act, 1986, challenging a lower court order that set aside a District Magistrate's attachment of a motorcycle belonging to Vinay Rai. The attachment was made on the basis of a …
The appellant Alok Akhila filed a first appeal (No. 51 of 2021) against the respondent Suraj Lal Yadav. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the appellant failed to appear and made no request for adjournment or to press the appeal. The court noted the absence of …
The Allahabad High Court, hearing Criminal Appeal No. 1000 of 1988, directed that the paper book and a typed copy of oral evidence be prepared as the evidence was not readable. The matter was listed for further hearing on 10 April 2026. No substantive merits of the appeal were decided.
The petitioners were selected as Lecturer Hindi in 1997 through an advertisement that appeared in Tarun Mitra and Dainik Jaunpur, and were appointed despite later salary disputes. After a series of writ petitions and contempt proceedings, their salaries were eventually paid, but a later order …
The applicants, Ishwardas and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention against the State of Uttar Pradesh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, while the learned Additional Government …
M/s Sammohan Advertising filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the Additional Civil Judge, Lucknow. No counsel appeared for either the petitioner or the respondent. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition and dismissed it for want of …
Shiv Mangal Singh filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18034 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. No petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present and made submissions. The court held that the …
Petitioners Ashutosh Kumar Chaturvedi and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No petitioner appeared before the court to press the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and the lack of any prosecution of the petition. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ-A No. 18667 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, Lucknow. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition, although counsel for the State was …
The appellant, Ram Samujh and another, filed a second appeal before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the appeal. The appellant also made no request for an adjournment or any other relief. The court noted the absence of any prosecution of the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2016 seeking quashment of proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while the State's counsel was present. The High Court observed that the application was extremely old and there was no …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No representative of the petitioner appeared to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State and the U.P. Basic Education Board were present. The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2934 of 2022) seeking relief against the State. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants even after a revised call, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court noted that …
The petitioner, Smt. Asha Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to prosecute the petition, although counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, …
The petitioners, Deepak Kumar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed by Smt. Maya Devi against the State of U.P. The court could not locate the case file for PIL No. 4101 of 2004, as it was missing from the records before the High Court moved to its new building in 2016. No representative appeared on behalf of the …
The applicants, Bechelal and others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 6 May 2022 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (POCSO and Rape Cases Court) in Criminal Revision No.8 of 2021, and a summoning order dated 4 …
Ram Bilas Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Employees Provident Fund Organisation. The petitioners' counsel was Mahendra Pratap Singh, while the respondents were represented by Gaurav Mehrotra, Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Asheesh Agnihotri, Shailendra …
The petitioner, Shri Bhagwat Singh, filed writ petition No. 1038 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while counsel for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18173 of 2018) was filed by Surendra Kumar and others against the State of U.P. The petitioners failed to appear before the court, while counsel for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ‑A No. 18248 of 2018) before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. …
The petition was filed by C/M Janak Laghu Madhyamik Vidyalay through its Manager seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and its officials. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the Court to pursue the writ petition. The State's counsel was present and argued the matter. The …
The petitioner, Smt. Tara Devi, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear for prosecution. The State of U.P. was represented and present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim …
Petitioner Yogesh Shukla filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court, but failed to appear for prosecution. The State counsel was present, while no representative for the petitioner attended. The Court noted the absence of the petitioner and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. …
The appellant, Jhau Lal, filed a first appeal against an order dated 2018 concerning a dispute with the manager/occupier/owner of a brick kiln. The appeal was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the appellant failed to appear or request any adjournment. The respondent's …
The appellant, Smt. Laxmi Devi, filed a first appeal before the Allahabad High Court against an order dated 2018. The respondents were the person and property of Sri Anant Raghunath S. Buddhey and others. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the appeal, and no request for …
The petitioner, Arun Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the respondent, NABARD Mumbai. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. The State counsel was present, but the petition lacked prosecution. The court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the summoning order and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 17106/22) relating to offences under Sections 323, 427 and 504 IPC. The parties had reached an amicable settlement through the Mediation and …
The petitioner, Amrendra Pratap Singh, filed Writ‑A No. 915 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. No representative of the petitioner appeared before the Court to press the petition. The State, represented by counsel, was present. The Court observed that the petition could not …
The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 940 of 2019 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative of the petitioner appeared to prosecute the petition. Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of want of prosecution. Consequently, any …
A writ petition (Writ‑A No. 997 of 2019) was filed by Kuwar Singh Burman against the State of U.P. and others. No petitioner appeared before the court to pursue the petition. Counsel for the State and other respondents were present, as were the petitioner's advocates. The court dismissed the …
The appellant, Rajendra Singh, filed a first appeal against the order dated 2016. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the appeal, and no request for adjournment was made. The respondent's counsel, Anchal Mishra, was present. The court noted the absence of any …
Petitioners Chaman Kumar Singh and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No petitioner appeared to pursue the petition, while counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh was present. The Court noted the absence of the petitioners and the lack of any steps taken to advance the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (CrPC Case No. 146078 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by a compromise deed dated 17‑11‑2025 and therefore …
The petitioner, Shailendra Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) required for travel abroad, after an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate had already granted permission to travel. Despite the magistrate’s order dated 21‑08‑2025, the police failed to issue the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 29084 of 2025) arising from FIR No. 219 of 2024, which involved multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The counsel indicated that the applicants did not wish to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking permission to withdraw the pending application and to re‑file it afresh with proper pleadings and documents. The counsel for the applicants prayed for liberty to withdraw and re‑file, while the opposing …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 28744 of 2020) arising from alleged offences under Sections 406, 420 and 467 of the IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by a compromise …
The applicants Vijay Bahadur Singh and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.19720 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 406 and 506 IPC. A compromise deed dated 19 September 2025, verified by the court, was …
The applicant, Sunil Kumar Jaiswal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No.599 of 2025, which arose from a criminal case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the same Act. A compromise deed dated 28‑08‑2025, verified by the trial …
Amir Hasan filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking permission to withdraw the pending application and to re‑file it with proper pleadings and documents. The State of Uttar Pradesh, represented by the Principal Secretary Home, did not oppose the request. The …
The applicant Ranjeet Singh filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of criminal proceedings (Case No. 79935 of 2024) arising from a Section 406 IPC offence. A compromise deed dated 04‑12‑2024 between the parties was verified by the court. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. The opposite party sought additional time to file a counter‑affidavit, and the court granted a ten‑day extension. The court ordered that the matter be listed afresh on 12 May 2026. The interim …
Petitioner Madhav Raj Gupta filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) to decide his application under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and a mandamus to restrain respondent No. 10 from obstructing his access to his house. The …
The petitioner, Ram Shankar Gupta, obtained several unsecured credit facilities from the respondent bank in 2015 and subsequently defaulted, leading the bank to declare the account a Non‑Performing Asset and invoke the SARFAESI Act to recover the dues by taking possession of the secured assets. The …
The State of Uttar Pradesh, acting as the revisionist, challenged a December 16, 2025 order of the Special Judge that dismissed its application under Order XXI Rule 99 read with Rule 101 of the CPC, which sought relief after the expiry of a 99‑year lease on land originally vested in the State’s …
