Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 1985

381 judgments · newest first · showing 201–381

N. HORANGSEversusM. TSUBONGSE

1985 INSC 59Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1982 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election, N. Horangse was declared elected over M. Tsubongse. Tsubongse filed an election petition alleging that Horangse committed corrupt practice by presenting four red waist‑coats to village leaders to induce their votes, invoking sections 123(1), …

SHANKER DASSversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

1985 INSC 48Case Allowed

Shankar Dass, a cash clerk, was convicted of breach of trust and released under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. Despite the probation, the Government dismissed him from service. He challenged the dismissal, arguing that section 12 of the Probation Act barred any "disqualification" …

RURAL LITIGATION AND ENTITLEMENT KENDRA DEHRADUN & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

1985 INSC 49Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard writ petitions filed by Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra challenging the continued operation of numerous limestone quarries in the Dehradun‑Mussoorie area, alleging environmental pollution and ecological damage. The Court examined reports of two expert bodies – the …

SANT LAL JAINversusAVTAR SINGH

1985 INSC 53Case Allowed

Sant Lal, a lessee of a plot of land under a ten‑year lease, granted Avtar Singh a one‑year licence to use a shed for a workshop. After the licence expired, Sant Lal terminated it and sued for a mandatory injunction to vacate the shed. Avtar Singh contended that he had purchased the entire property …

PRATIBHA RANIversusSURAJ KUMAR & ANR.

1985 INSC 50Appeal(s) allowed

Pratibha Rani, an estranged wife, filed a criminal complaint under s.406 IPC alleging that her husband Suraj Kumar, his father, brothers and brother‑in‑law had misappropriated her stridhan (dowry) worth Rs.60,000 that was entrusted to them at the time of marriage. The Punjab & Haryana High Court …

DR. (MRS.) SUSHMA SHARMA ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

1985 INSC 54Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by temporary lecturers who challenged the Rajasthan Universities Teachers (Absorption of Temporary Lecturers) Act, 1979. The Act allowed absorption of temporary lecturers appointed on or before 25 June 1975, provided they were still in service on 12 June 1978. …

KARAM PAL & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF LNDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 51Dismissed

The petitioners, Assistants under the Central Secretariat Service Rules, 1962, challenged the select lists for promotion to Section Officer (1978‑1980) and the common seniority list, alleging that the quota for direct recruitment had broken down, the rota system could not operate, and seniority …

H.V. PARDASANI, ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 52Dismissed

The petitioners, Section Officers of the Central Secretariat Service, challenged the combined seniority list and the method of fixing inter‑se seniority between directly recruited officers and promotees, alleging that Rules 12, 13(5) and Regulation 3(3) of the Fourth Schedule were ultra‑vio​les of …

ASHUTOSH SWAIN ETC. ETC.versusSTATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY & ORS.

1985 INSC 44Appeal(s) allowed

The State Transport Authority of Orissa advertised for applications for all‑India tourist permits in 1974. The appellants applied directly for such permits, were granted them, and their subsequent appeals to the State Transport Appellate Tribunal were dismissed. The High Court, however, quashed the …

BIHAR STATE HARIJAN KALYAN PARISHADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 45Case Allowed

The Bihar State Harijan Kalyan Parishad filed a writ petition challenging two letters—one from the Ministry of Steel and Mines and another from the Steel Authority of India Ltd.—which denied reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in promotions by selection to Group ‘A’ posts with a …

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS' UNIONversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1985 INSC 46Case Allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) employs contract labour through contractors. Contract labourers, organized by the Food Corporation of India Workers' Union, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking departmentalisation or, alternatively, the extension of benefits under the Contract Labour …

ARUN KUMAR CHATTERJEEversusSOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS.

1985 INSC 47Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a clerk transferred at his own request from the North-Eastern Railway to the South-Eastern Railway in 1958, was placed below temporary staff in the seniority list of the Sealdah Division, contrary to Rule 312 of the Railway Establishment Manual. He made representations and later filed …

STATE OF ORISSA & OTHERSversusTHE TITAGHUR PAPER MILLS COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

1985 INSC 43Disposed off

The State of Orissa issued notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, imposing a 10% purchase tax on bamboos and standing trees agreed to be severed. Petitioners challenged the validity of these notifications, arguing that the transactions were not sales of goods, that the tax amounted to …

WORKMEN OF THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusM/S. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

1985 INSC 40Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned 464 labourers at the Food Corporation of India's Siliguri depot who were originally employed through a contractor. In 1973 the corporation abolished the contractor and introduced a direct payment system, paying wages directly to the workers via Sardar/Mondal agents. The …

GASKET RADIATORS PVT. LTDversusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN. & ANR.

1985 INSC 41Dismissed

Gasket Radiators Pvt. Ltd., incorporated in 1964, was initially exempted from paying the special contribution imposed by Chapter V‑A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, until the scheme was extended to its area. The exemption was withdrawn on 31 May 1969 and the company challenged the …

M. P. IRRIGATION KARAMCHARI SANGHversusTHE STATE OF M. P. AND ANR.

1985 INSC 38Appeal(s) allowed

The M.P. Irrigation Karamchar Sangh, a trade union, demanded a special Chambal allowance, dearness allowance equal to Central Government employees, and payment of strike wages from 1966. After settlement attempts failed, the dispute was reported under Section 12(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, …

RAMANATHANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.

1985 INSC 39Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Government, invoking powers under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and a central notification (G.S.R. 800, 1978), issued the Tamil Nadu Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1982, which completely banned the transport of paddy from certain districts. Traders challenged the order, …

CITY CORPORATION OF CALICUTversusTHACHAMBALATH SADALINAN & ORS.

1985 INSC 35Appeal(s) allowed

The Calicut City Corporation levied a licence fee under Schedule IV of the municipal act for the use of land to soak coconut husks. The respondents, who were conducting the soaking without a licence, challenged the fee, arguing that no specific service was conferred and that the levy was either an …

WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.versusDESH BANDHU GHOSH AND ORS.

1985 INSC 34Dismissed

The West Bengal State Electricity Board terminated a permanent employee under Regulation 34, which allowed dismissal with three months' notice or salary in lieu, without giving any reasons. The employee challenged the termination in a writ petition, and the Calcutta High Court struck down Regulation …

STEEL INDUSTRIALS KERALA LTD.versusCAPT. S. M. REBELLO & ORS.

1985 INSC 37Disposed off

Capt. S. M. Rebello was appointed as master of the vessel M.V. Anastasia for a one‑year term. The ship was sold as scrap and his services were terminated on 20 December 1980. He claimed full‑year wages, arguing that under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 a master is treated as a seaman and is …

MOPED INDIA LTD.versusTHE ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NELLORE AND OTHERS

1985 INSC 36Appeal(s) allowed

Moped India Ltd manufactured mopeds and sold them to a network of dealers under agreements that allowed the dealers a commission of Rs.110, Rs.145 or Rs.165 per unit, which the company treated as a trade discount and deducted from the price list for excise duty purposes. The Assistant Collector of …

SAKHKKAR MILLS MAZDOOR SANGHversusGWALIOR SUGAR CO. LTD.

1985 INSC 31Appeal(s) allowed

Gwalior Sugar Co. employed 800 seasonal workers who worked only during the sugar‑cane crushing season. The employer refused to pay them the minimum bonus guaranteed under Section 10 of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, arguing that they were not employed for the whole accounting year. The Industrial …

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusSHIVA PARASHAD DAS AND ORS.

1985 INSC 32Appeal(s) allowed

Shiva Prasad Das, a forester appointed by the Conservator of Forests, was suspended by the District Forest Officer pending a disciplinary enquiry into alleged negligence. He challenged the suspension before the Orissa High Court, arguing that it violated Article 311(1) of the Constitution and Rule …

RATHI KHANDSARI UDYOG ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1985 INSC 33Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of khandsari sugar factories in Uttar Pradesh, challenged the applicability of the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 (as amended in 1970) to their product, arguing that what they produce is "khandsari sugar" and not "khandsari" covered by the Act, and that the levy of …

UNION OF INDIAversusANNAM RAMALINGAM ETC. ETC.

1985 INSC 30Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision striking down Section 28 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 on the ground of excessive delegation of legislative power. Section 28 prohibits a licensed gold dealer from carrying on money‑lending or banking business on the …

FOMENTO RESORTS AND HOTELS LTD.versusGUSTAVO RANATO DA CRUZ PINTO & ORS.

1985 INSC 29Appeal(s) allowed

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. applied to acquire land owned by Gustavo Ranato da Cruz Pinto under Chapter VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The government issued a preliminary notification under Section 4 in October 1980, followed later by a Section 6 declaration after an agreement with the …

VENGDASALAM PILLAIversusUNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY

1985 INSC 28Dismissed

Vengdasalam Pillai, a landholder in Pondicherry, partitioned his property in 1970, allocating land to his two minor sons and retaining a small parcel for himself, while his wife owned land purchased with her Sridhanam money. The land reforms authority deemed his total holding, including his wife’s …

RAM PYAREversusRAM NARAIN & OTHERS

1985 INSC 27Appeal(s) allowed

The vendor, Matbar Mal, who held sirdari rights, deposited the amount required under Section 134 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act on 28 October 1961 to acquire bhumidari rights and on the same day executed a sale deed in favour of Ram Pyare. A bhumidari certificate was issued only …

J.R. VOHRAversusINDIA EXPORT HOUSE PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER

1985 INSC 25Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant landlord created a three‑year limited tenancy for the first respondent under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and sought possession of the premises at the tenancy's expiry. After the tenant failed to vacate despite two registered notices, the landlord obtained a warrant …

D.R. KOHLI AND ORS.versusATUL PRODUCTS LTD.

1985 INSC 22Appeal(s) allowed

Atul Products Ltd manufactured synthetic organic dyes (cibagenes and cibanogenes) and relied on Notification No. 180/61 dated 23 November 1961, which exempted dyes from excise duty if they were produced from other dyes on which duty had already been paid. The basic dyes used were manufactured before …

BALKRISHAN GUPTA AND ORS.versusSWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. AND ANR

1985 INSC 24Dismissed

The Collector of Kanpur appointed a receiver over Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd. and ordered the seizure, attachment and pledge of its 10 lakh shares in Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. The Cotton Mills Company, together with four other shareholders, requisitioned an extraordinary general meeting of Polytex under …

IBRAHIM BACHU BAFAN & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS .

1985 INSC 23Case Allowed

The petitioners were detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. While their detention orders were pending before the Gujarat High Court, the Court quashed the orders by exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, but the same day fresh …

CALCUTTA DOCK LABOUR BOARD AND ANR.versusSMT. SANDHYA MITRA AND ORS.

1985 INSC 21Appeal(s) allowed

Md. Safiur Rehman, a dock worker, died leaving a widow and son. The Calcutta Dock Labour Board sought attachment of the gratuity payable to Rehman under its scheme to satisfy a decree against the heirs. The Small Causes Court ordered attachment, overruling the Board’s objection that gratuity was …

PERIA NACHI MUTHU GOUNDER AND ORS.versusRAJA THEVAR (DEAD) AND ORS.

1985 INSC 20Dismissed

Muthammal, the absolute owner of certain lands, executed a deed of settlement in 1925 endowing the properties to a family temple and appointed herself as trustee for life. In 1930 she executed a registered deed of cancellation and later alienated the properties, selling them to the father of the …

R. SRIHARI NAIDUversusGOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

1985 INSC 18Dismissed

The Regional Transport Authority (RTA) initially issued a notification under s.57(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 to invite applications for stage‑carriage permits, but the RTA was later found to be improperly constituted for lacking a non‑official member as required by s.44. After being …

MST. SADIQUA BEGUM & ORS.versusTHE BOARD OF REVENUE, MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

1985 INSC 17Dismissed

The appellants sought validation of land transfers under the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950, which the Collector approved. The Commissioner, invoking section 50 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, issued a revision of the Collector’s order, which was affirmed by …

YOGESHWAR JAISWAL, ETC, ETC.versusSTATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ORS.

1985 INSC 16Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were granted temporary stage‑carriage permits on 10 January 1980 under section 68F(1C) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, nine years after a scheme had been published under section 68C. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal and the Allahabad High Court set aside those permits, holding …

BANK OF BARODAversusMOTI BHAI AND ORS.

1985 INSC 15Appeal(s) allowed

The Bank of Baroda granted a demand loan of Rs.36,000 to Moti Bhai, secured by a promissory note, a hypothecation of standing crops and a mortgage deed, with two guarantors. When the loan defaulted, the Bank sued the borrowers in a civil court for recovery of the principal, interest and, in case of …

M/S LOHIA MACHINES LIMITED AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1985 INSC 14Dismissed

The petitioners, industrial undertakings, challenged the validity of Rule 19A of the Income‑Tax Rules, 1962, which excluded borrowed capital and fixed the computation of "capital employed" on the first day of the previous year for the purpose of the tax exemption under Section 80J of the Income‑Tax …

S. SUNDARAM PILLAI, ETC.versusV.R. PATTABIRAMAN ETC.

1985 INSC 13Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined several appeals concerning eviction petitions under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. The central issue was the interpretation of "wilful default" in the proviso to section 10(2)(i) and its Explanation, which states that a default is wilful if it …

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAM SAGAR YADAV AND ORS

1985 INSC 11Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State prosecuted four police officers for the death of Brijlal, who was arrested on a spurious charge and died in police custody after being beaten. The prosecution relied heavily on Brijlal's dying declaration to the magistrate, which identified the Station House Officer and …

DHANJIBHAI RAMJIBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1985 INSC 10Dismissed

The appellant, appointed as a Sales Tax Officer on a two‑year probation, continued in service without a confirmation order and was terminated after three years. He challenged the termination before the Gujarat High Court, which dismissed his writ petition and the subsequent appeal. The Supreme Court …

BHARTUversusRANDHIR SINGH & ORS.

1985 INSC 12Dismissed

The appeal concerned the interpretation of Sections 7, 7A and 8 of the PEPSU Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955. The petitioner argued that Section 8, which imposes a minimum tenancy term of three years for tenancies created after the 1956 amendment, does not create an additional ground of …

K. NAGARAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC.,versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC.

1985 INSC 6Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh government, after coming to power in 1983, reduced the superannuation age for most government employees from 58 to 55 years by issuing an order and two notifications, claiming it would create employment opportunities for youth. Over 28,000 employees were forced to retire, …

RAMESH CHANDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1985 INSC 5Appeal(s) allowed

Ramesh Chand was convicted under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Om Prakash based on the prosecution's claim that he, along with two others, stabbed the victim at night near Hindon Bridge and was found with a blood‑stained knife. The defence argued that Chand was …

SARDAR TOTA SINGHversusM/S GOLD FIELD LEATHER WORKS, BOMBAY .

1985 INSC 4Appeal(s) allowed

Gold Field Leather Works let a building to a partnership firm, which sub‑let a shop to Manek Chand, who in turn sub‑let it to Sardar Tota Singh in 1952. Gold Field sued Manek for unlawful sub‑letting and obtained a decree for possession; Tota Singh later sued for a declaration that he was a lawful …

RASIKLAL VAGHAJIBHAI PATELversusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER

1985 INSC 3Dismissed

The petitioner, a former Sales Tax Inspector removed for proven misconduct, applied for a Head Clerk position with Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and falsely claimed he had resigned voluntarily, suppressing the fact of his removal. Upon discovery, he was charge‑sheeted and removed again, and his …

HAR SHARAN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

1985 INSC 2Dismissed

Har Sharan Verma filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the appointment of K.P. Tewari as a Minister of Uttar Pradesh, contending that the Constitution, as amended by the Sixteenth Amendment (Article 173(a)), required a minister to be a member of the State Legislature. The petitioner …

STATE OF BIHARversusBISHNU CHAND LAL CHAUDHARY AND ORS.

1985 INSC 1Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Prithwi Chand Lall Choudhary, claimed Rs. 2,00,000 in damages alleging that the State of Bihar, through its manager J.P. Mukherjee, wrongfully took over his estate under the Bihar State Management of Estates and Tenures Act, 1949, and acted with negligence and bad faith. The trial …

BALMER LAWRIE WORKERS' UNION, BOMBAY AND ANR.versusBALMER LAWRIE AND CO. LTD. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 241Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a challenge by the Balmer Lawrie Workers Union (a non‑recognised union) to the constitutional validity of Section 20(2)(b) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 and to Clause 17 of a settlement that required a 15 …

SAYAJI MILLS LTD.versusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

1984 INSC 242Dismissed

Hirji Mills Ltd., a textile factory, was wound up and its assets were sold to Sayaji Mills Ltd. The factory remained idle from December 1954 until November 12, 1955, when Sayaji Mills restarted operations, invested fresh capital, renovated machinery and re‑employed about 70% of the former workers. …

MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

1984 INSC 240Appeal(s) allowed

Four persons were tried before a Sessions Judge for murder and related offences; Mohinder Singh was convicted under Section 304 IPC and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment, while the other three were acquitted. The State appealed the acquittals and also appealed Mohinder Singh's …

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusM. PADMANABHAN NAIR

1984 INSC 238Dismissed

The respondent, a retired government employee, received his pension and gratuity more than two years after retirement, prompting a suit for liquidated damages in the form of interest. The District Court awarded interest at 6% per annum, which the High Court affirmed, and the respondent did not …

JAGAN NATHversusRAM KISHAN DASS AND ANR.

1984 INSC 236Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed three ejectment applications against the tenant for possession of a room in Kamla Nagar, Delhi. In the first proceeding (1967) the Rent Controller ordered the tenant to pay arrears under s.14(2) read with s.15 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958; the tenant complied and the …

S. KANDASWAMY CHETTIARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1984 INSC 233Dismissed

The tenants of several buildings owned by Hindu, Christian and Muslim religious public trusts and public charitable trusts challenged a 1976 Government of Tamil Nadu notification that exempted all such buildings from the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. They argued that …

S. M. MAHENDRU AND COMPANY ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1984 INSC 234Dismissed

The petitioners, tenants in a building owned by an Apex Co‑operative Society, challenged a 1976 notification issued under section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 which exempted all buildings owned by co‑operative societies from the Act’s provisions. They argued that …

WORKMEN OF HINDUSTAN STEEL LTD. AND ANR.versusHINDUSTAN STEEL LTD. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 237Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the dismissal of an assistant of Hindustan Steel Ltd. who was removed from service under Standing Order 32 on the ground that his continued employment was "inexpedient". The employer dispensed with the disciplinary enquiry prescribed in Standing Order 31 and did not record …

DR. BALBIR SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DELHI AND ORS.

1984 INSC 235Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined challenges by several property owners against assessments made by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. The core issue was how to determine the rateable value of four categories of properties …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusNEW KWALITY SWEET HOUSE & ORS.

1984 INSC 230Dismissed

In 1975 a food inspector collected a 200‑gram sample of suji from the accused, although the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules required 250 g, and sent it to the public analyst, who reported excessive moisture and ash. The Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the accused on the ground that the …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESHversusM. CHANDRA SEKHAR

1984 INSC 229Dismissed

The assessee filed voluntary income‑tax returns after the statutory deadline prescribed under s.139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer levied interest under clause (iii) of the proviso to s.139(1) and treated the assessee as in default, imposing penalties under s.271(1)(a). The …

LINGAPPA POCHANNA APPELWAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ETC.

1984 INSC 226Dismissed

The appellant purchased agricultural land from a tribal seller with collector's permission, but the Sub‑Divisional Officer, invoking the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974, ordered restoration of possession to the tribal buyer. The appellant appealed, arguing that …

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSUDHIR DEY AND ANR.

1984 INSC 227Dismissed

The State of West Bengal filed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 challenging a Calcutta High Court order that granted bail to the accused Sudhir Dey and others and appointed the Deputy Inspector General of the CBI as a Special Officer to investigate murder allegations. The Supreme Court …

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ETC.versusSAMPAT LAL & ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 228Appeal(s) allowed

Two young boys were found dead under mysterious circumstances in Barrackpore, West Bengal, prompting letters to the Calcutta High Court alleging police negligence and demanding an independent investigation by the CBI. The High Court, without giving notice to the State, issued a rule directing the …

LAKSHMINARAYAN GUIN & ORS.versusNIRANJAN MODAK

1984 INSC 225Dismissed

The appellants, landlords, obtained a trial decree for possession of a house in Memari, West Bengal, on grounds of rent arrears and need for demolition. The respondent appealed, and while the appeal was pending the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 was extended to Memari, introducing Section 13 …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusUNITED COLLIERIES LTD. & ORS.

1984 INSC 224Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed against a Bombay High Court order that had sent the dispute over a staff car of the Technical Advisor to the North Chirimiri Collieries to a civil suit. The car, purchased in 1966 and transferred to United Collieries Ltd., was claimed to be a fixed asset of the mine and …

NARENDER KUMAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1984 INSC 222Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, twenty‑two apprentices who completed a one‑year training with the Punjab State Electricity Board, claimed that their letters of appointment required the Board to absorb them in the event of vacancies, in line with a Government of India instruction that at least 50% of direct …

S. HARCHARAN SINGHversusS. SAJJAN SINGH AND ORS.

1984 INSC 220Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged the election of respondent No. 3 to the Punjab Legislative Assembly on the ground that the candidate had committed a corrupt practice under section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The allegation was that the Akal Takht, the supreme religious authority …

M/S. AMAR NATH OM PARKASH AND ORS. ETCversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 221Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 23‑A of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, which permits market committees to retain market fees collected in excess of the statutory rate when the burden has been passed on to the next purchaser. The appellants argued that …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. ETC.versusMRS. KAMAL SUKUMAR DURGULE AND ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 219Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of plots in Bandra, Bombay, were ordered by the Municipal Corporation and the State to demolish buildings constructed without permission and the lands were later declared "vacant" under the Maharashtra Vacant Lands (Prohibition of Unauthorised Occupation and Summary Eviction) …

M/S VARIETY EMPORIUMversusV. R. M. MOHD. IBRAHIM NAINA

1984 INSC 217Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed seven eviction suits under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming a bona‑fide personal requirement for the premises. The trial court decreed eviction against all tenants; the appellate authority upheld the decrees for the four ground‑floor shop …

HARSHARAN VERMAversusCHARAN SINGH AND ORS.

1984 INSC 215Dismissed

Harsharan Verma filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuance of Charan Singh as Prime Minister and S.N. Kacker as minister, alleging that Charan Singh failed to obtain a Lok Sabha mandate within three weeks as directed by the President, resigned on 20 August 1979, …

GENERAL LABOUR UNION (RED FLAG) BOMBAYversusB. V. CHAVAN AND ORS.

1984 INSC 214Disposed off

The General Labour Union (Red Flag) Bombay filed two complaints alleging that the employers, Delta Wires Pvt. Ltd. and Delta Spokes Manufacturing Co., had imposed a lock‑out in violation of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair …

ASHOK KUMAR BHATTACHARYYAversusAJOY BISWAS AND ORS.

1984 INSC 213Dismissed

The petitioner challenged the election of the respondent, who was the Accountant‑in‑charge of Agartala Municipality, on the ground that he held an office of profit under the Government of Tripura within the meaning of Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution. The High Court held that the municipal post …

DEBRAJAN RAY & ORS.versusCOMPTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 212Dismissed

The Comptroller and Auditor General framed a 1966 scheme allowing Upper Division Clerks who had served at least 20 years, exhausted all chances to pass the Subordinate Accounts Service Examination, or were over 45, to be appointed as temporary Accountants without needing to pass the exam. The …

CHIMAN LALversusMISHRILAL

1984 INSC 211Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord served a notice on 21 October 1969 demanding arrears of rent for a portion of a shop and verandah and claimed termination of the tenancy, thereafter filing an eviction suit under section 12(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The tenant deposited the arrears but …

NEPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U. P. & ORS .

1984 INSC 207Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nepal Singh, a temporary Sub‑Inspector of Police, was terminated from service on the ground of alleged corruption and a second marriage without government permission, based on a circular issued by the Inspector General of Police. The termination order was issued by the Deputy …

SURENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 208Case Allowed

The case concerned nine seats reserved in the medical colleges of Jammu and Kashmir for candidates from Bihar. Thirty‑five applicants applied, and a merit list of seven candidates was prepared by the Controller of Examinations, which included the petitioner Surendra Kumar. The Chief Minister of …

SAMARIAS TRADING CO. PVT. LTD.versusS. SAMUEL & ORS.

1984 INSC 209Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained an oral application in the judge's chambers, without any written record, and issued an interim order maintaining the status quo of a liquor shop auction. The order was made without stating facts, legal questions, or reasons, and was later extended without the …

JAVED AHMED ABDUL HAMID PAWALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1984 INSC 210Case Allowed

Javed Ahmed Abdul Hamid Pawala was convicted of multiple murders and sentenced to death on 6 February 1982, with the sentence confirmed by the High Court and subsequent appeals dismissed. After a clemency petition was rejected, he filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, arguing …

M/S. MSCO. PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1984 INSC 206Dismissed

M/S. MSCO Pvt. Ltd. imported stainless‑steel plates under a 1977 customs notification that granted a concessional duty provided the goods were used to manufacture specified articles and the finished articles were sold only to "industrial units". The company supplied certificates that the plates were …

RAM SHARAN YADAVversusTHAKUR MUNESHWAR NATH SINGH AND ORS.

1984 INSC 204Dismissed

Ram Sharan Yadav, a Communist Party candidate, was elected to the Bihar Legislative Assembly in 1977. The defeated candidate, Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh, filed an election petition alleging that Yadav had engaged in corrupt practices of undue influence under Section 123(2) of the Representation of …

BHAG MALversusCH. PARBHU RAM AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 203Dismissed

In the 1982 Haryana Legislative Assembly election, Bhagmal was declared elected by a margin of ten votes over Parbhuram. Parbhuram filed an election petition alleging improper counting and the influence of a Naib Tehsildar on the Returning Officer, leading to a recount of rejected ballot papers. The …

KHILLI RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1984 INSC 205Appeal(s) allowed

Khilli Ram, a Head Constable, was convicted under IPC s.161 and the Prevention of Corruption Act (sections 5(1)(d) and 5(2)) for allegedly accepting a bribe in a police‑trap. The prosecution relied on a decoy witness, two panch witnesses and several police officers, but many of these witnesses …

SURINDER SINGHversusHARDIAL SINGH AND ORS.

1984 INSC 202Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1980 Punjab Legislative Assembly election, Surinder Singh was elected but his victory was challenged on two grounds of corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951: (1) alleged "undue influence" for disturbing an Akali Party meeting with firearms, and (2) alleged …

HANS RAJversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1984 INSC 199Appeal(s) allowed

Hans Raj, a clerk who began service in 1949, was prematurely retired by the Deputy Commissioner of Bhatinda on 20 August 1975 under Rule 3(1)(a) of the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975, on the ground that he had completed more than 25 years of service. He challenged the …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBABURAO RAVAJI MHARULKAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 198Case Partly allowed

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Baburao Ravaji Mharulkar and others for selling ice cream that contained only 5.95% milk fat, below the 10% minimum prescribed by Paragraph A.11.02.08 of Appendix B to the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. The trial court acquitted the respondents, …

C. ELUMALAIversusSTATE OE TAMIL NADU

1984 INSC 200Case Allowed

The Supreme Court considered a writ petition under Article 32 filed by C. Elumalai, an adolescent offender convicted of a capital offence and sentenced to life imprisonment, who was detained in a Borstal School under section 10-A of the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act, 1925. The issue was whether the …

NARAIN KHAMMANversusPARDUMAN KUMAR JAIN

1984 INSC 197Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, N. Khamman, was a tenant of P. K. Jain, a former government servant who had been allotted government residential accommodation. A 1975 government order required servants who owned a dwelling in Delhi to vacate such accommodation or pay market rent. The respondent vacated the …

VEERABHADRA RAOversusTEK CHAND

1984 INSC 196Dismissed

M. Veerabhadra Rao, a junior advocate, attested a forged affidavit (Ex. A‑1) on behalf of respondent Tek Chand, enabling the procurement of an income‑tax clearance certificate and registration of a sale deed. The State Bar Council’s Disciplinary Committee found him guilty of professional misconduct …

SMT. J. S. RUKMANI ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1984 INSC 195Case Allowed

The widows of former Madras State government servants who retired before the 1956 reorganisation sought family pension under the Tamil Nadu Notification of 26 May 1979. The Tamil Nadu Government later issued a clarification (G.O. MS/63, 18 March 1982) that denied pension where the servant’s last …

K.M. MOHAMAD ABDUL KHADER FIRMversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

1984 INSC 194Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, 1976 (Act II of 1976) which amended the 1970 Act by introducing graded tax rates based on taxable turnover and prohibiting the passing on of the tax to consumers. They argued that the amendment …

TULSI RAMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1984 INSC 191Dismissed

Tulsi Ram, a vendor of edible oil, was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act after a public analyst found cottonseed oil mixed in his soybean oil. The analyst's report was forwarded to him 18 days after the prosecution was instituted, contrary to Rule 9A which requires the report to …

M. P. MITTALversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 189Dismissed

The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) underwrote preference shares of Depro Foods Ltd. and the managing director of Depro Foods personally guaranteed the dividend payment, agreeing that any dues could be recovered as land revenue. When the company defaulted on a dividend of Rs …

RADHEY SHYAM ETC. ETC.versusKALYAN MAL

1984 INSC 190Dismissed

The landlord sought eviction of the tenants under the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, claiming a bonafide need to demolish the building and construct a gold and silver ornaments factory. The lower courts upheld the eviction, citing sections 12(1)(f) and 12(1)(h), and the tenants …

GURPAL TULI AND ORS., ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1984 INSC 187Dismissed

The appellants, teachers (Masters/Mistresses) employed in Punjab state schools, held postgraduate qualifications but were paid under the Rs 220‑500 scale. They claimed entitlement to higher pay grades (Rs 300‑450/600 or Rs 250‑400/550) prescribed in paragraph 2 of the State Government Circular …

JASPAL SINGHversusADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BULANDSHAHR AND ORS.

1984 INSC 188Dismissed

Naubat Singh was the tenant of a shop in Bulandshahr when the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 came into force. After his death in 1974, landlord Ratan Lal sought eviction under the Act. Jaspal Singh, the nephew of the deceased, claimed he was an …

JATINDER KUMAR & ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

1984 INSC 184Dismissed

The petitioners were candidates selected by the Subordinate Service Selection Board for the post of Assistant Sub‑Inspector of Police. The Board recommended 144 names, but only 57 vacancies existed and the anticipated 170 vacancies never materialised because the Government rejected the proposal to …

AHMED HUSSAIN KHANversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1984 INSC 185Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Ahmed Hussain Khan and S. Gopalan, were senior civil servants who had joined the Hyderabad State service before its merger with India and later transferred to Andhra Pradesh. Their pension was governed by Rule 299(b) of the Hyderabad Civil Services Rules, which originally stipulated …

SALABUDDIN MOHAMED YUNUSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1984 INSC 186Appeal(s) allowed

S.M. Yunus, a former civil servant of the erstwhile State of Hyderabad who retired in 1956, claimed a pension of Rs 1,000 per month in Indian currency, arguing that his right had vested at retirement. The Andhra Pradesh Government had, by a 1971 notification, retrospectively reduced the maximum …

BANWAR LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1984 INSC 181Dismissed

Four persons, including the appellant Banwar Lal, were tried for the murder of Gyanchand under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge acquitted three accused and convicted only Kanahiya Lal, but the Rajasthan High Court set aside the acquittal of Banwar Lal, relying on the …

LALLU RAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

1984 INSC 182Dismissed

The appellants, convicted of life imprisonment for the 1971 murder of Kunwar Bahadur, sought acquittal on the ground that a man of the same name was found dead in 1983, suggesting the original victim was alive for twelve years. The Supreme Court, invoking its power under Article 136, ordered the …

RAJINDER KUMAR KINDRAversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION THROUGH SECRETARY (LABOUR) AND ORS.

1984 INSC 183Appeal(s) allowed

Rajinder Kumar Kindra, a salesman, was dismissed after a domestic enquiry found him guilty of misconduct for allegedly negligently keeping his private cheque‑book unattended, which the employer claimed enabled the manager‑cum‑cashier to defraud the company. The dispute was referred to an arbitrator …

D. CAWASJI AND CO. MYSOREversusTHE STATE OF MYSORE AND ANR.

1984 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, excise contractors licensed to sell arrack, challenged the State of Mysore's collection of sales tax on the total price of arrack, which included excise duty and cesses. The Mysore High Court held that sales tax could not be levied on excise duty, health cess or education cess and …

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI KANPUR, ETCversusGANGA DAL MILL AND CO. AND ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 175Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Mandi Samiti levied market fees on the sale of dal (split legumes) produced by Ganga Dal Mill, arguing that dal was a specified agricultural produce under the U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964. The respondents contended that only whole‑grain legumes were specified and that …

AYYASWAMI GOUNDER AND ORS.versusMUNNUSWAMY GOUNDER AND ORS.

1984 INSC 176Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a 1927 partition of jointly owned agricultural land where a common well (W2) and its channel were retained for joint use. The appellants, owners of an exclusive well (W1) purchased in 1928, irrigated their allotted plots by connecting a small channel from W1 to the common channel …

VINAYAK ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1984 INSC 174Disposed off

Seven persons were tried for a series of murders allegedly committed as part of a criminal conspiracy under s.302 read with s.120B IPC, and for murder under s.302 read with s.34 IPC. The trial court acquitted all of them of the conspiracy charge but convicted two of them (accused 1 and 6) for the …

STATE OF PUNJABversusHINDSONS (P) LTD.

1984 INSC 173Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Hindsons (PJ Ltd.), a dealer in tractors and spare parts, claimed a deduction for sales of belt‑pulley attachments on the ground that they were agricultural implements exempt from sales tax under Entry 34 of Schedule B of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. The assessing …

MATHEW AREEPARMTIL & ORS.versusSTATE OF BLHAR AND ORS.

1984 INSC 172Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard writ petitions highlighting that a large number of adivasi persons were being detained in jails without trial for petty offences. The Court observed that many cases were pending for years, violating the right to speedy trial. It directed that adivasi accused facing sentences …

RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGH, NAGPURversusTHE MODEL MILLS, NAGPUR AND ANR.

1984 INSC 171Appeal(s) allowed

The Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh filed four references under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act seeking bonus for workmen of Model Mills, Nagpur for the years 1964‑68, alleging the employer was liable under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The employer contended that a notified order under Section …

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusVALLABHAPURAM RAVI

1984 INSC 170Dismissed

Vallabhapuram Ravi was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. While serving the sentence he was transferred by the Andhra Pradesh Government to a Borstal School under section 10‑A of the Andhra Borstal Schools Act, 1925, to remain there until he turned 23. When he was not released …

RAGHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1984 INSC 169Dismissed

Raghbir Singh was convicted in a Sessions case on 1 February 1980 for offences under Sections 307 and 459 of the IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. While serving this sentence, he remained in judicial custody from 11 January 1980 for a separate case that later resulted in a conviction on 16 …

SHEORATAN AGARWAL & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1984 INSC 168Dismissed

The Managing Director and Production Manager of M/s 5‑S Limited were prosecuted under the Essential Commodities Act for alleged violations of state licensing and price‑control orders. They contended that, under Section 10 of the Act, they could not be prosecuted unless the company itself was also …

UNION OF INDIAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1984 INSC 166Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan, through its District Rehabilitation Officer, sued the Union of India and the Railway Administration in a district court for damages to tents damaged while in transit on Indian Railways. The Union contended that the suit was barred by Article 131 of the Constitution, which …

HARIHAR POLYFIBRESversusTHE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ESI CORPORATION

1984 INSC 167Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the term "wages" under Section 2(22) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 encompasses various allowances such as House Rent Allowance, Night Shift Allowance, Heat, Gas and Dust Allowance and Incentive Allowance. The Court held that the Act, being a …

JIWANI DEVI PARAKIversusFIRST LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, CALCUTTA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 165Disposed off

The petitioner, a lessee of premises in Calcutta, challenged the State’s continued requisition of part of his building under the West Bengal Premises Requisition and Control (Temporary Provision) Act, 1947, which had been renewed repeatedly since 1958 for a government showroom. He argued that the …

JOGINDFR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

1984 INSC 164Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants' land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and initial compensation of Rs.27,992.84 was fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Subsequent enhancements by the District Judge (Rs.11,307.10) and the High Court (Rs.17,919.30) raised the issue of the rate of interest payable, …

WORKMEN EMPLOYED BY HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.versusHINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED

1984 INSC 160Appeal(s) allowed

The workmen of Hindustan Lever Ltd. sought confirmation in the higher grades in which they had been acting for more than three months, claiming that they should be made permanent and receive retrospective benefits. The employer contended that the dispute was not an industrial dispute because it …

SAMBANGI APPLASWAMY NAIDU & OTHERSversusBEHARA VENKATARAMANAYYA PATRO AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 162Appeal(s) allowed

Behara Venkataramanayya Patro, the mortgagor, executed two usufructuary mortgage deeds in 1939 and 1942 in favour of Sambangi Thavitinaidu, who was then a sitting tenant of the same property. After obtaining a preliminary decree for redemption, the mortgagor died and his legal representatives sought …

SLTAL PRASAD SAXENA (DEAD) BY LRS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

Sita Prasad Saxena sued the Union of India for salary arrears; his appeal was pending in the Madhya Pradesh High Court when he died. His son Mahendra Kumar Saxena filed applications for substitution of heirs, to set aside the abatement of the appeal, and for condonation of delay under Section 5 of …

BHAGIRATH KANORIA & ORS. ETCversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 158Dismissed

The Provident Fund Inspector filed complaints against the directors and factory manager of Burhanpur Tapti Mills Ltd for failing to pay the employer's contribution to the Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952, for the period February 1970 to June 1971. The accused contended …

NASIRUL HAQUEversusJITENDRA NATH DEY

1984 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

Nasirul Haque, a tenant, appealed a second appeal order of the Patna High Court that had dismissed his challenge to an eviction decree. The High Court had remanded the matter to the trial court for a finding on partial eviction, accepted the trial court's finding without scrutiny, and dismissed the …

V. SASIDHARANversusPETER & KARUNAKAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 155Dismissed

V. Sasidharan, a clerk in a firm of lawyers, was dismissed and appealed under the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960. The firm contended that it was not a "commercial establishment" within the meaning of the Act, leading the Appellate Authority to dismiss the appeal on a …

SATYENDRA NARAIN SINGH & OTHERS.versusRAM NATH SINGH & OTHERS.

1984 INSC 156Dismissed

The appellants, members of a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, filed a revision application in the Patna High Court which was to be heard by Justice S.K. Jha. They later engaged Shri Sailendra Kumar Jha, the son of Justice Jha, to appear for them, prompting concerns about a son …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CALCUTTAversusDALHOUSIE PROPERTIES LTD.

1984 INSC 157Dismissed

Dalhousie Properties Ltd, assessed for the year 1966-67, claimed a deduction of Rs.1,78,784 for municipal taxes under the proviso to section 23(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the deduction should be allowed on the basis of the tax liability even though the amount was not fully paid and …

CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LTD. ETC.versusBHUBANESWAR SINGH & ORS.

1984 INSC 154Dismissed

The partnership firm that owned the Tariya coking coal mine had its management taken over by the Central Government in October 1971 under the Emergency Ordinance, later replaced by the Management Act. The Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1971 extinguished the owners' title effective 1 May …

PREM PRAKASHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 150Case Allowed

The petitioners, members of the Scheduled Caste, challenged their exclusion from appointment as Sub‑Judges in the Delhi Judicial Service despite being on the merit list of the 1980 competitive examination. The High Court had fixed the number of reserved vacancies based on the number of candidates …

CHANDRA BANSI SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC.

1984 INSC 151Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar issued a Section 4 notification on 19 August 1974 to acquire 1,034.94 acres in Village Digha for a housing scheme, following the procedural steps under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. On 24 May 1980, a 4.03‑acre parcel belonging to the influential Pandey families was released …

DEEPAK PAHWA ETC.versusLT. GOVERNER OF DELHI AND ORS.

1984 INSC 152Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a combined notification under Sections 4 and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and a declaration under Section 6, on two grounds: a 29‑day delay between the Gazette publication and the public notice of the notification, and an eight‑year inter‑departmental discussion …

MOHAMMAD IDRIS AND ANR.versusRUSTAM JAHANGIR BABUJI AND OTHERS.

1984 INSC 153Dismissed

Petitioners Mohammad Joris and others were sentenced to one month in civil jail by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court for contempt after breaching an undertaking given in a pending suit. They appealed to a Division Bench under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, but the appeal …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSUNJL KUMAR GHOSH

1984 INSC 149

The petitioner, a passenger, fell from a bogie that was being shunted at a railway station and sustained a hand injury. The Railway Administration argued that the injury was not the result of an "accident to the train" as contemplated by Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The High Court …

COROMANDEL FERTILIZERS LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1984 INSC 146Dismissed

Coromandel Fertilizers Ltd., a manufacturer of various fertilizers, appointed selling agents (E.I.D. Parry Ltd. and Rallis India Ltd.) who received a 3.5% commission on net realizable value for arranging sales. The company claimed (1) exemption from excise duty on its product Gromor NPK 14‑35‑14 …

P. JAYAPPANversusS.K. PERUMAL, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TUTICORIN

1984 INSC 147Dismissed

The petitioner, a proprietor of a food business, filed income‑tax returns that were later found to contain false statements and suppressed transactions after a search of his premises. Complaints were lodged against him under sections 276C and 277 of the Income‑Tax Act and sections 193 and 196 of the …

GOA, DAMAN AND DIU BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATIONversusKUMARI HEMA LAAD AND ORS.

1984 INSC 144Appeal(s) allowed

A batch of students filed writ petitions challenging clauses (1) and (2) of Rule 37 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Rules, 1975, which barred inspection and re‑valuation of answer books. The Bombay High Court, relying on its earlier decision in Paritosh Bhupesh …

RENUSAGAR POWER COMPANY LTD.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ANR.

1984 INSC 145Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a suit filed by Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. seeking a declaration that three claims (unpaid regular interest, delinquent interest, and compensatory damages) were beyond the scope of an arbitration clause could be stayed under Section 3 of the Foreign Awards …

SUDARSAN CHITS (I) LTD.versusO. SUKUMARAN PILLAI & ORS .

1984 INSC 143Appeal(s) allowed

Sudarsan Chits (India) Ltd. was ordered to be wound up under the Companies Act, 1956, but the High Court held the winding‑up order in abeyance while a scheme of compromise was being implemented. The company sought a direction that the provisional liquidator file claim petitions under section …

O.P. SINGLA & ANR. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1984 INSC 140Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the inter‑se seniority of promotee judges (appointed by promotion under Rule 16) and direct recruits (appointed from the Bar under Rule 5(2)) to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service. The petitioners, promotees, argued that seniority should be based on their dates of continuous …

UNION OF INDIAversusH.R. PATANKAR & ORS.

1984 INSC 141Dismissed

The first respondent, H.R. Patankar, was recruited to the IAS in 1955 and assigned the year 1956 as his year of allotment. Several officers promoted from the Gujarat State Civil Service (respondents 3‑9) were also assigned the same year of allotment but began officiating in senior posts earlier than …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSURENDER KOTIANKAR

1984 INSC 139Dismissed

The State of Karnataka appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136 for special leave to challenge the Karnataka High Court's dismissal of its appeals against the conviction of Surender Kotiankar under Sections 408 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court had rejected the State's request …

J. MOHAPATRA & CO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER

1984 INSC 136Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the selection of textbooks and general‑reading books for school and college libraries in Orissa, where the State formed committees that included authors whose books were under consideration. Publishers challenged the selections, alleging bias, lack of standing, and violation of …

TIKA RAMversusMUNDIKOTA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL & ORS.

1984 INSC 137Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a headmaster of a private school, was reverted to assistant teacher by the school management after a disciplinary enquiry. He appealed to the Deputy Director of Education, who set aside the management’s order on grounds of violation of natural justice and remanded the case for a fresh …

NIRMAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1984 INSC 135Appeal(s) allowed

Nirmal Singh, a Branch Manager of a cooperative bank, was dismissed after an inquiry into a fraudulent draft encashment. He challenged his dismissal, and the Government of Punjab referred his grievance to the Conciliation Officer, who recommended that the dispute be referred to a Labour Court. The …

SMT. SAROJ RANIversusSUDARSHAN KUMAR CHADHA

1984 INSC 134Dismissed

The wife filed a suit under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking restitution of conjugal rights, and a consent decree was passed. After a year, the husband filed a petition under Section 13 for divorce, claiming that no cohabitation had occurred following the decree. The trial court …

ZAFAR KHAN AND ORS.versusBOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. & ORS.

1984 INSC 133Dismissed

The appellants, Zafar Khan and others, claimed possession of land based on a decree under the U.P. Tenancy Act and later asserted they were bhumidars under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The respondents, having become adhivasis under the same Act, regained possession …

SUNEEL JATLEY ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA ETC .

1984 INSC 132Case Allowed

The State of Haryana, through Maharshi Dayanand University, reserved 25 MBBS seats for candidates who had studied up to class 8 in a common rural school. The petitioners challenged this reservation as violative of Articles 14, 15(4) and 29(2) of the Constitution, arguing that the classification was …

PRABODH VERMA AND OTHERS, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS, ETC.

1984 INSC 130Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a strike by teachers in Uttar Pradesh in 1977, after which the State appointed 2,257 "reserve pool" teachers on a temporary basis under Ordinance No.25 of 1977. Subsequent Ordinances No.10 and No.22 of 1978 sought to absorb these teachers and give them preferential treatment in …

CHHOTELAL PYARELAL THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND ORS.versusSHIKHARCHAND

1984 INSC 131Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed an eviction application under Clause 13(3)(vi) and (vii) of the Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 against the partnership firm M/s Chhotelal Pyarelal. The firm contended that the application was not maintainable because the partners were …

HARBANS SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1984 INSC 129Dismissed

Harbans Singh was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and the trial court imposed a sentence exceeding the statutory minimum. The Punjab and Haryana High Court, exercising its discretion under Section 5(2), reduced the sentence to the period already served, citing reasons it …

SHANTILAL MANGANLAL AND ANR.versusCHUNNILAL RANCHODDAS THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 128Dismissed

In Shantilal Manganlal & Anr. v. Chunnilal Ranchoddas (1984), the petitioners filed a review application against the Supreme Court's order dismissing their Special Leave Petition, but the review petition contained no substantive grounds and merely promised to file them later. The petition was filed …

ALLAHABAD CANNING CO.versusUNION OF INDIA

1984 INSC 127Appeal(s) allowed

The Allahabad Canning Co., a manufacturer of syrups and related food products, purchased levy sugar from K.M. Sugar Mills at a price higher than the controlled price. The excess amount of Rs 22,681.88 recovered by the High Court registrar was credited to the Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund under …

J. K. BHARATIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS .

1984 INSC 126Dismissed

The petitioners challenged Maharashtra's ban on selling tickets of lotteries organized by the Indian Red Cross Society (Dadra and Nagar Haveli branch) that were authorized by that Union Territory's administration. They argued that the Bombay Lotteries (Control and Tax) and Prize Competition (Tax) …

SUKH DEO NARAINversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1984 INSC 125Dismissed

The petitioner filed a transfer petition under Article 139A(1) of the Constitution seeking to move a writ petition pending before the Rajasthan High Court to the Supreme Court, alleging that the High Court petition raised the same questions as a Special Leave Petition (SLP) already pending before …

G.P. DOVAL AND OTHERSversusTHE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND ORS.

1984 INSC 124Case Allowed

Petitioners, appointed as Khandsari Inspectors in 1960‑64 under temporary posts, challenged a provisional seniority list dated 22 March 1971 that placed them below later recruits. They argued that, since their appointments were later regularised by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, their …

STATE OF U.P.versusP.A. MADHU

1984 INSC 119Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a union secretary, allegedly fired a pistol at a company manager outside an industrial tribunal, killing him. Three eye‑witnesses (PWs 5, 6 and 7) testified that they saw the shooting and that the accused was seized by them and the police. A cryptic telephonic message about the …

DHARMESH PRASAD VERMAversusFAIYAZAL AZAM

1984 INSC 120Appeal(s) allowed

Dharmesh Prasad Verma appealed against the election of Faiyazal Azam to the Bihar Legislative Assembly, alleging that Azam committed a corrupt practice under Section 123(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 by procuring a jeep from his friend Kabir Ahmed and using it to convey voters to …

GANU RAMversusRIKHI RAM KAUNDAL AND ORS.

1984 INSC 123Appeal(s) allowed

Ganu Ram contested a Himachal Pradesh assembly seat reserved for Scheduled Castes. His nomination form did not contain the statutory caste declaration, but he attached a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate's certificate stating he belonged to the Lohar caste. The Returning Officer accepted the nomination and …

SHARAD BIRDHI CHAND SARDAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1984 INSC 121Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Sharad Birdhichand Sarda was convicted of murder under s.302 IPC for allegedly poisoning his wife Manju with potassium cyanide and sentenced to death. The prosecution's case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the deceased's letters, oral statements to relatives, and …

R.P. BHATTversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1982 INSC 97Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a supervisor in the Border Roads Organisation, was terminated during probation and later faced disciplinary action for desertion, resulting in removal from service under the Central Civil Services Rules. He appealed the removal to the Director-General, who dismissed the appeal without …

LAKSHMI CHARAN SEN AND ORS ETC.versusA.K.M. HASSAN UZZAMAN AMO ORS. ETC.

1982 INSC 43Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Chief Election Commissioner, the Chief Electoral Officer and the Election Commission of India for allegedly issuing vague and arbitrary directions for a de novo revision of West Bengal's electoral rolls and for …

MAHARAO SAHIB SRI BHIM SINGHJI ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1980 INSC 219Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of vacant urban land, challenged the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 on grounds that several provisions violated Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution and the basic structure doctrine. The Court examined the artificial definition of "family" in …