Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1986

216 judgments, newest first — showing 201–216.

RIB TAPES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 1832 September 1986Appeal(s) allowed

RibTapes (India) Pvt. Ltd. imported 27 knitting machines in 1972 under a licence. Customs authorities held the machines were reconditioned and that the declared price (Rs. 77,441) was far below the actual value (Rs. 2,98,359). The Collector of Customs found the company in breach of sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Cus

TULSIPUR SUGAR CO. LTD. ETC.versusSECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF U.P. & ORS.

1986 INSC 1032 May 1986Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Government, under Section 14(1)(a) of the U.P. Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Act, 1961, granted a remission of purchase tax of Re. 0.51 per quintal to twenty sugar factories in the eastern zone that purchased sugarcane yielding low recovery, while denying the same relief to other similarly situated factori

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, BOMBAYversusVANAZ ENGINEERING (P) LTD., BOMBAY

1986 INSC 1042 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

Vanaz Engineering (P) Ltd. introduced a gratuity scheme in mid‑1970 and, based on an actuarial report, provisioned Rs 2,11,305 as a liability as of 31 December 1970. The Income‑Tax Officer allowed only Rs 27,249, the difference between the provision and the liability for 1969, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner a

SAWAI SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1986 INSC 1052 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

Sawai Singh, a Superintendent in the Rajasthan Government, was removed from service after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of favouring a candidate, manipulating a dummy candidate's withdrawal, and forging a nomination paper by erasing the word "panch". The inquiry relied on vague charges and the testimony of a

DR. H.P. HAJELAversusN. S. VERMA & ORS.

1986 INSC 1062 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior lecturer and Head of Department at D.A.V. College, Kanpur, was granted extraordinary leave without pay to serve on deputation at the University of Aden, with a guarantee that his lien and seniority would be preserved. Upon his return, the acting Head refused to hand over charge, claiming seniori

RAM CHANDERversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 1072 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Chander, a Grade B shunter, was removed from railway service for assaulting his superior. An ex parte enquiry found him guilty, and the General Manager imposed removal. The appellant appealed to the Railway Board under Rule 18(ii) of the Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968, but the Board dismissed th

SONIK INDUSTRIES, RAJKOTversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF RAJKOT

1986 INSC 562 April 1986Dismissed

The Rajkot Municipality framed draft rules for levying rates on buildings and lands, obtained State Government sanction, and published a newspaper notice under section 77 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 stating that the rules could be inspected and purchased at the municipal office. Sonik Industries challeng

M. DURAISWAMIversusMURUGAN BUS SERVICE & ORS.

1986 INSC 572 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed

M. Duraiswamy, holder of an inter‑regional stage‑carriage permit issued by the Periyar Regional Transport Authority (RTA), applied to that RTA for a variation that included converting the service to a mofussil one and extending the route into Salem District, which lay wholly in the jurisdiction of the Salem RTA. The Pe

VRAJLAL MANILAL AND CO. AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER

1986 INSC 582 April 1986Dismissed

The appellants, a bidi manufacturing partnership and dealers in tendu leaves, challenged the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1968 and the 1971 amendment which re‑classified tendu leaves as non‑raw material and taxed them at a higher rate. They alleged violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 286(3), 301 a

PRAKASH COTION MILLS PVT. LTD.versusRASHTRIYA MILLS MAZDOOR SANGH

1986 INSC 1551 August 1986Case Partly allowed

The mill of Prakash Cotton Mills was forced to shut from 24 March to 10 June 1964 because essential raw materials were detained by excise authorities. The Rashtriya Mazdoor Sangh sought closure compensation for regular employees and Badli (casual) workers. The Labour Court ordered compensation at 50% of wages; the Indu

RAJENDRA PRASAD MATHUR ETC. ETCversusKARNATAKA UNIVERSITY & ANR.

1986 INSC 1011 May 1986Dismissed

The Karnataka University prescribed, under emergency powers, that admission to its engineering courses required passing the two‑year Pre‑University Examination of the Bangalore board or an equivalent exam recognised by the university. The appellants, who had either passed the 11‑year Higher Secondary Examination of Raj

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusKODAIKANAL MOTOR UNION (P) LID.

1986 INSC 1021 May 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the Madras High Court’s decision that the penalty under section 10A(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 should be calculated on the basis of the concessional tax rate applicable to goods covered by a ‘C’ form. The assessee had purchased motor spare parts using ‘C’ form certifi

CHENCHU RAMI REDDY & ANR.versusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

1986 INSC 551 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Andhra Pradesh authorised the sale of lands belonging to Sri Bugga Math, Tirupati to certain respondents by private negotiation at Rs.62,500 per acre under the proviso to clause (c) of s.74(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable & Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1966. The appellants challenged this order

JAYANTRAO AMRATRAO PRADHANversusPARTHASARTHY, COLLECTOR OF KAIRA DISTRICT AND OTHERS

1986 INSC 541 April 1986Dismissed

The appellant claimed that lands granted to his ancestor as remuneration for patelship were service inam and not liable to resumption under the Gujarat Patel Watans Abolition Act, 1961 or the Resumption Rules, 1908. The Collector, invoking Rule 4 of the Resumption Rules, classified part of the lands as service inam and

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search