Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2001

608 judgments, newest first — showing 601–608.

GAJRAJ SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 2381 May 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a draft scheme under the Motor Vehicles Acts (1939 and 1988) to nationalise 39 road‑transport routes in Uttar Pradesh, of which 38 routes were distinct from the Saharanpur‑Shahdra‑Delhi route previously dealt with in Ram Krishna Verma. The Court held that the statutory right t

NAIR AND ORS .versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 2391 May 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by circus owners challenging a 1998 notification issued under Section 22 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 that prohibited the exhibition and training of bears, monkeys, tigers, panthers and lions. The petitioners argued that the notification was arbitrary, that Sect

KERALA MAGISTRATES (JUDICIAL) ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 1291 March 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991 which integrated the Civil Judicial Service and Criminal Judicial Service into a single Kerala Judicial Service. Sub‑rule (4) of Rule 3 fixed a 3:1 ratio for Subordinate Judges versus Chief Judicial Magistrates and a 5:2 ratio for Munsif

M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RE: M/S. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2001 INSC 1281 March 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court was asked to clarify its 10 May 1996 order directing H‑category hazardous industries in Delhi to surrender their land for green‑belt development. The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) sought directions on six specific issues, including the extent of land to be surrendered, the requirement of road acce

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusTHE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, RAMKOTE, HYDERABAD AND ORS. ETC.

2001 INSC 611 February 2001Case Partly allowed

The transport wing of Tirupati Tirumala Devasthanam (TTD) was transferred to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) in 1975. Some of the 850 transferred workmen opted to be governed by APSRTC’s rules, while others did not. The workers’ union claimed that, under Clause 13 of the transfer agreement,

INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 621 February 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two contracts awarded in 1977 for earthwork and aqueduct construction in Andhra Pradesh. The contractors claimed reimbursement for losses caused by a cyclone in November 1977 and floods in June 1978, but their claim letters did not comply with Clause 83 of the contract, which required any c

INLAND STEAM NAVIGATION WORKS' UNIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 631 February 2001Case Partly allowed

The River Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., operating a river service with about 8,000 employees, suffered heavy losses during the 1965 armed conflict with Pakistan and entered into a scheme of arrangement with the Central Inland Water Transport Corporation (CIWTC) that transferred assets but not the undertaking, and provided

BOSE ABRAHAM ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 641 February 2001Dismissed

The Kerala Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act imposes a tax on any motor vehicle that enters a local area for use or sale and is liable for registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Petitioners Bose Abraham and others challenged the tax's applicability to excavators and road rollers, arguing tha

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search