RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS.versusD.C.I.T. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 7801 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, assessees under the Income Tax Act, were subjected to a raid that uncovered two separate sets of books of accounts, prompting the Deputy Commissioner to propose a special audit under Section 142(2A). The Commissioner approved the proposal without giving the appellants any notice or opportunity to be hea…
SHYAMALI DASversusILLA CHOWDHRY AND ORS.
2006 INSC 7811 November 2006Dismissed
The appellant, Shyamali Das, claimed ownership of land acquired by the West Bengal Housing Board and filed a suit for injunction and declaration of title. She also sought to be impleaded in the reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, but the Land Acquisition Judge dismissed her application on the ground t…
MAHESH LALL SEAL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 5751 September 2006Case Partly allowed
The appellants' property was requisitioned in 1987 and acquired under the Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. Although a 1975 agreement fixed a price of Rs 18,98,000, the claimants received this amount in 1993 under protest and later sought higher compensation, leading the State Government to a…
SHAM SHANKAR KANKARIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2006 INSC 5761 September 2006Case Partly allowed
The deceased Vijay was tied to a cot and brutally assaulted with an iron pipe and wooden stick by six accused, leading to his death. While on his deathbed he gave a dying declaration to his brother (PW9) and mother (PW10) identifying all six assailants. The trial court convicted the principal accused under Section 304 …
TATA CUMMINS LTD.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.
2006 INSC 4801 August 2006Dismissed
Tata Cummins Ltd, a diesel engine manufacturer, obtained an eight‑year exemption from sales tax on raw material purchases under the Bihar Industrial Policy, 1995, valid until 31‑Dec‑2003. After the creation of Jharkhand, the state introduced the Jharkhand Industrial Policy, 2001, effective 15‑Nov‑2000, whose Clause 28.…
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE, M.P.
2006 INSC 4811 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. operated an electrical and mechanical workshop at Korba to repair mining equipment for adjacent coal mines. The Central Government had declared the workshop a "mine" under Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952. The assessee claimed exemption from central excise duty under Notification No. 63/9…
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNEversusM/S. CADBURY INDIA LTD.
2006 INSC 4821 August 2006Dismissed
Cadbury India Ltd. manufactured several intermediate milk products that were captively consumed in its own factories for making chocolate and were never sold. The assessee sought valuation under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, presenting a cost statement prepared by a chartered accountant. …
M/S. SONEBHADRA FUELSversusCOMMISSIONER, TRADE TAX, U.P. LUCKNOW
2006 INSC 4831 August 2006
M/S Sonebhadra Fuels, which manufactures coal briquettes (coal tikli), sought exemption/rebate of sales tax on the basis that the briquettes were the same commodity as coal, which had already been taxed. The Assessing Authority, Appellate Authority and the Sales Tax Tribunal rejected the claim, holding the briquettes t…
HANIF AZAMI ELIY ASAZAMIversusSHABANA MOHSIN GHAZI @ SHAIKH AND ANR.
2006 INSC 4841 August 2006Disposed off
The appellant purchased a flat jointly owned by Respondent No.1 and her husband (Respondent No.2) on the basis of an unregistered power of attorney and paid Rs.11.40 lakh in cash. Fearing disturbance of his possession, he filed a suit for injunction and the trial court eventually ordered the parties to maintain status …
ROMESH KUMAR SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 4851 August 2006Dismissed
The appellant, a Havildar/Clerk in the Ladakh Scouts with 17 years of service, was found to have participated in espionage during 1984‑85. A Court of Inquiry under Rule 177 of the Army Rules, 1954 confirmed his involvement, and the Army dismissed him under Section 20(1) of the Army Act, 1950, invoking the proviso to Ru…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusNAGPUR DISTILLERS, NAGPUR AND ANR.
2006 INSC 2721 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra issued a demand for a fee under Rule 5(2) of the Bombay Rectified Spirit (Transport in Bond) Rules, 1951 against Nagpur Distillers, which purchases rectified spirit and extra neutral alcohol from other distilleries for manufacturing Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). The distiller filed a writ …
RAJ SINGHversusACHAL MISHRA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 2701 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court had earlier remitted a 1979 writ petition filed by Raj Singh, the occupant, to the Allahabad High Court on the condition that he deposit Rs 3,00,000 as arrears of rent. Raj Singh failed to pay the amount within the stipulated time, leading the High Court to dismiss his writ petition and the Eviction O…
ACHAL MISHRAversusRAMA SHANKAR SINGH AND ORS.
2006 INSC 2711 May 2006Disposed off
The Supreme Court had earlier directed the tenants to deposit Rs 3,00,000 as a condition precedent for pursuing their writ petition concerning arrears of rent on a building occupied for 26 years without payment. The tenants applied for clarification, contending that a payment of Rs 1,45,860 made on 5 July 2004 should b…
BISHNU PRASAD DASHversusRAJ KUMAR AGARWAL AND ORS.
2006 INSC 2731 May 2006Disposed off
The appellant, representing IDCOL, challenged a decision of the Orissa High Court that set aside a government order awarding a copper cable tender to IDCOL and directed that a later higher offer by OSICL be considered. The High Court had entertained the writ petition without impleading IDCOL, disposed of the case withi…
MERCANTILE BANK LTD., BOMBAYversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY-III
2006 INSC 2741 May 2006Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined two questions arising from Mercantile Bank Ltd.'s assessment for AY 1978‑79. First, it held that interest on doubtful advances kept in a suspense account was not assessable income, as the 1952 Central Board of Direct Taxes circular exempted such interest when there was no real probability of …
BIJOY KUMAR DUGARversusBIDYADHAR DUTT AND ORS.
2006 INSC 1311 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a head‑on collision between a car and a bus in which the car driver, Raj Kumar Dugar, died. His parents claimed compensation from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), which awarded a sum based on his present earnings, applied a multiplier, and held both drivers equally liable, directing the ins…
UNION OF INDIAversusMUNSHI RAM (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 1321 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India acquired land for the Hissar Cantonment extension and the Collector awarded compensation, which was enhanced by a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Reference Court and later the High Court further increased the compensation, but the Supreme Court reduced it in 1997. Wh…
A.P.S.R.T.C. AND ANR.versusB.S. DAVID PAUL
2006 INSC 561 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (AP SRTC) terminated certain employees who claimed they were its workers. The Labour Court held the termination illegal and ordered reinstatement, after which the employees sought back wages under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court,…