Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2020

571 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

SAURAV YADAV & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 714Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the selection of police constables in Uttar Pradesh where two female candidates—one OBC and one SC—scored higher than the cut‑off for the General Female category but were denied selection. The dispute centered on whether the "second view" (adopted by the Allahabad and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.versusKESHAO VISHWANATH SONONE & ANR.

2020 INSC 715Appeal(s) allowed

The Bombay High Court entertained four writ petitions filed by members of the Gowari community seeking declaration that they belong to the Scheduled Tribe (ST) ‘Gond Gowari’ and quashed the ST certificates issued to them. The High Court held that the tribe ‘Gond Gowari’ was extinct before 1911 and …

SURESH SHAHversusHIPAD TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

2020 INSC 711Appeal(s) allowed

Suresh Shah, the landlord, sub‑leased a property to Hipad Technology India Private Limited. A dispute arose under the sub‑lease dated 14‑11‑2018, and the lease contained an arbitration clause. Shah issued a notice invoking the clause, nominated retired Justice Mukul Mudgal as sole arbitrator, and …

PRADEEP KUMAR SONTHALIAversusDHIRAJ PRASAD SAHU @ DHIRAJ SAHU & ANR.

2020 INSC 710Disposed off

In the biennial Rajya Sabha election from Jharkhand, MLA Amit Kumar Mahto cast his vote at 9:15 a.m. on 23 March 2018, but was convicted later that afternoon. The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia, challenged the validity of that vote, arguing that the conviction rendered Mahto disqualified under …

RAHNA JALALversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 707Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a mother‑in‑law, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 498A IPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 alleging that her son had pronounced triple talaq on his wife. The Kerala High Court denied the bail application, prompting an …

M/S. SS GROUP PVT. LTD.versusAADITIYA J. GARG & ANR.

2020 INSC 708Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents booked flats with the appellant‑builder but the flats were not delivered on time, prompting them to file consumer complaints before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) seeking a refund. Under Section 38(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the appellant …

DR NARESH KUMAR MANGLAversusSMT. ANITA AGARWAL & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 706Disposed off

Dr. Naresh Kumar Mangla filed a criminal appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court's order granting anticipatory bail to his deceased daughter's in‑laws under Section 438 CrPC. The FIR alleged dowry harassment, assault in 2017, money demands and the unnatural death of the daughter within seven …

AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY LTD.versusMMTC LTD.

2020 INSC 705Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an international commercial arbitration under a Long‑Term Agreement for the supply of coking coal between Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pty Ltd (appellant) and MMTC Ltd (respondent). The arbitral tribunal held that MMTC breached the contract by failing to lift 454,034 MT of …

SEELAN @ JEYASEELANversusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 703Dismissed

The petitioner, Seelan @ Jeyaseelan, was convicted for raping a six‑year‑old girl. He filed a Special Leave Petition contending that the charge was framed only under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, which does not carry the mandatory ten‑year minimum punishment prescribed in Section …

SANJAI TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2020 INSC 704Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanjai Tiwari, was charged under several IPC offences and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. A third‑party advocate, calling himself a social activist, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a High Court order directing the Special Judge to …

SMT. S. VANITHAversusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT & ORS.

2020 INSC 701Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Smt. S. Vanitha, sought to remain in a house that she claimed was her matrimonial home and a "shared household" under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (PWDV Act). Her parents‑in‑law, invoking the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 …

SAMIR AGRAWALversusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 700Disposed off

Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, filed an information under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging that Ola and Uber engaged in price‑fixing and resale price maintenance through their algorithmic pricing. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) dismissed the complaint, …

ACTION ISPAT AND POWER PVT. LTD.versusSHYAM METALICS AND ENERGY LTD.

2020 INSC 699Dismissed

Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. filed a winding‑up petition against Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd. for unpaid dues. The Company Judge admitted the petition, appointed an Official Liquidator and seized the appellant's premises. State Bank of India, a secured creditor, filed an IBC application and …

VIDYA DROLIA AND OTHERSversusDURGA TRADING CORPORATION

2020 INSC 697Reference answered

The Supreme Court of India addressed two interconnected issues: whether landlord-tenant disputes governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 are arbitrable, and the scope of judicial review under Sections 8 and 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The case arose from a tenancy …

ROHTAS & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2020 INSC 694Disposed off

The appellants Rohtas, Sanjay and Bijender were convicted for attempt to murder under IPC s.307 read with s.149 and for rioting with deadly weapons under s.148. They challenged the convictions on the ground that, after the acquittal of three co‑accused, the remaining number fell below the statutory …

KUSH KALRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 692Disposed off

The petitioner filed a writ under Article 32 challenging the practice of affixing posters outside the homes of COVID‑19 positive persons under home isolation, alleging violations of privacy, dignity and other fundamental rights. The Union of India submitted the Ministry of Health and Family …

G H MADHAVIversusCHAGAN & ORS.

2020 INSC 690Appeal(s) allowed

Madhavi was appointed as a temporary teacher in a private secondary school on 16 July 1985, holding a BA and B.Ed., and was placed in Category ‘C’ of Schedule ‘F’. Chagan was appointed on 1 August 1985 as an assistant teacher with only a senior secondary certificate and a Diploma in Education, …

SARITHA S. NAIRversusHIBI EDEN

2020 INSC 693Dismissed

Saritha S. Nair filed nominations from two Lok Sabha seats but her nominations were rejected because she had been convicted in two criminal cases, each carrying a three‑year imprisonment, invoking disqualification under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. She challenged the …

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ORS.versusSHAJI POULOSE & ORS.

2020 INSC 691Appeal(s) allowed

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) filed transfer petitions under Article 139-A(1) seeking to move nine writ petitions from the Kerala, Madras and Calcutta High Courts to the Supreme Court. The writ petitions challenge Chapter VI of ICAI's Guidelines dated 08‑08‑2008, which caps …

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.versusU.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD.& ANR.

2020 INSC 686Disposed off

The Madhya Pradesh Public Works Department issued a tender for a 7.473 km flyover and received bids from UPSBC, Rajkamal Builders and Rachana Construction. UPSBC was rejected on the ground that it omitted the fact of an FIR and charge‑sheet relating to a collapsed bridge, which the court held to be …

DAULAT SINGH (D) THR. LRS.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS

2020 INSC 684Appeal(s) allowed

Daulat Singh, the appellant, owned 254.2 bighas of land and gifted 127.1 bighas to his son in 1963, leaving him with 17.25 standard acres below the ceiling limit. The Rajasthan Revenue Ceiling Department later reopened the case in 1982, alleging excess holdings, and the High Court declared the gift …

ANITA SHARMA & ORS.versusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 685Case Partly allowed

The deceased, Sandeep Sharma, died from injuries sustained in a night-time collision between his car, driven by its owner Sanjeev Kapoor, and an oncoming truck. His dependents filed a claim for compensation alleging that Kapoor's rash and negligent driving caused the accident. The Motor Accident …

THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNITversusP.V. KRISHNAMOORTHY AND ORS.

2020 INSC 688Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of notifications issued under Sections 2(2) and 3A of the National Highways Act, 1956 that declared a green‑field stretch (C‑K‑S) as National Highways NH‑179A and NH‑179B and authorised land acquisition for the Chennai‑Krishnagiri‑Salem corridor. The Court …

AMISH DEVGANversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 682Disposed off

The petitioner, journalist Amish Devgan, hosted a televised debate on the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act and described the Sufi saint Pir Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti as an invader, terrorist and robber, leading to seven FIRs in different states under Sections 295A, 153A and 505(2) of the …

JAYANT ETC.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 678Disposed off

The private appellants were caught in a surprise inspection for illegal mining and were offered compounding of the offences under the Madhya Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, which they accepted by paying a penalty. Subsequently, a magistrate, suo motu, exercised powers under Section 156(3) of the CrPC …

CHAMAN LALversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2020 INSC 675Dismissed

The appellant was charged with rape and criminal intimidation after a mentally retarded girl (IQ 62) became pregnant; DNA evidence established him as the child's biological father. The trial court acquitted him, citing the four‑month delay in filing the FIR and questioning the victim's mental …

SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 676Dismissed

Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorised agent for Punjab lotteries, filed a writ petition under Art.32 challenging the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) on the grounds that the definition of ‘goods’ in s.2(52) – which includes actionable claims – is unconstitutional and that …

PANKJESHWAR SHARMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 673Dismissed

The Director General of Police of Jammu & Kashmir advertised for Sub‑Inspector posts and prepared a province‑wise merit list, which was challenged as contrary to the recruitment rules. After several rounds of litigation, the Supreme Court, relying on a concession by the Advocate General, …

SUMEDH SINGH SAINIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 679Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a retired Director General of Police, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC after an FIR was lodged in 2020 by the brother of a deceased victim, alleging offences dating back to 1991, including murder under Section 302 IPC which was added later based on approvers' …

NIMAY SAHversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2020 INSC 670Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nimay Sah, elder brother of the deceased's husband, was convicted under Section 498-A read with Section 34 IPC for alleged dowry harassment leading to the death of his sister‑in‑law, Asha Kumari. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses and …

PARAMVIR SINGH SAINIversusBALJIT SINGH & ORS.

2020 INSC 672Directions issued

In Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh & Ors., the Supreme Court revisited its earlier directions (April 3, 2018) requiring the use of photography and videography at crime scenes. The Court noted that compliance affidavits filed by 14 States and 2 Union Territories were inadequate, lacking details …

SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 671Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants (husband, father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law) were convicted under Section 304B IPC for dowry death based on a claim that the deceased was poisoned after demanding Rs 10 lakhs. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution proved the essential ingredients of a dowry death – marriage …

S. D. CONTAINERS INDOREversusM/S. MOLD TEK PACKAGING LTD.

2020 INSC 668

S.D. Containers (Indore) sued M/s Mold Tek Packaging Ltd for infringement of its registered container and lid designs, seeking a declaration and permanent injunction. The defendant counter‑claimed, seeking cancellation of the designs under Section 4(a) of the Design Act, 2000, and filed an …

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.versusBRAHMPUTRA METALLICS LTD., RANCHI AND ANR.

2020 INSC 667Disposed off

The Jharkhand government, under its 2012 Industrial Policy, promised a 50% exemption from electricity duty for captive power plants for five years, to be effected by a notification within one month. The notification was finally issued on 8 January 2015, but made the exemption prospective, thereby …

ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2020 INSC 665Disposed off

The appellant, a news‑channel editor, was arrested in November 2020 in connection with an FIR under Sections 306 and 34 of the IPC alleging his role in the suicide of a contractor who claimed unpaid dues. He filed a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC …

INDIAN COMMODITY EXCHANGE LIMITEDversusNEPTUNE OVERSEAS LIMITED & ORS.

2020 INSC 663Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined proceedings initiated by the Forward Markets Commission (later merged with SEBI) against Neptune Overseas Ltd (NOL) and its director Kailash Ramkishan Gupta for alleged trading irregularities. A detailed show‑cause notice dated 21 June 2011 was served only on Gupta, and …

GAJENDRA SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2020 INSC 662Disposed off

Gajendra Sharma, a home loan borrower, challenged the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) notification dated 27 March 2020 that allowed a six‑month moratorium on loan repayments but continued to levy interest, claiming it was ultra vires and violated his right to life under Article 21. The Union of India, …

MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 666Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 (the 2020 Rules) and the mechanisms for appointment, tenure, and service conditions of members of 19 …

MANOHAR LAL JAT & ORS. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 660Dismissed

The Rajasthan government created 554 Tax Assistant posts and filled 80% through direct recruitment (DR) and 20% through promotion of departmental staff (DP). Advertisements for DRs were issued on 25‑01‑2011 and for DPs on 24‑05‑2011; however, DP appointment letters were issued before those of DRs. …

B. K. RAVICHANDRA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 653Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, B.K. Ravichandra and others, sought to recover possession of three parcels of land that had been requisitioned by the Union of India under the Defence of India Act, 1962 and deemed to be covered by the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Properties Act, 1952. The High Court, …

TEJ BAHADURversusSHRI NARENDRA MODI

2020 INSC 655Dismissed

Tej Bahadur, a former Border Security Force officer dismissed in 2017, filed an election petition challenging Narendra Modi's election to the Lok Sabha from Varanasi, alleging his own nomination was wrongly rejected and the election was vitiated. He had filed two nomination papers in April 2019 but …

RUSODAY SECURITIES LTD.versusNATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 650Disposed off

Rusoday Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), exceeded its gross exposure limits in 1997, leading the NSE to withdraw its trading facilities and later expel it for failing to maintain required capital deposits. The appellant challenged the validity of the NSE's …

VENKATESAN BALASUBRAMANIYANversusTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, D.R.I. BANGALORE

2020 INSC 652Dismissed

Two offences under the NDPS Act were investigated – one for contraband recovered from a car in Hyderabad and another for contraband seized from a factory in Maharashtra. A combined complaint covering both offences was filed in the Special Court at Omerga on 6 July 2018, well within the 180‑day …

JAYANTILAL VERMAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)

2020 INSC 649Dismissed

The appellant, Jayantilal Verma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the strangulation death of his wife, Sahodara Bai, whose body was found in their matrimonial home. The prosecution's case rested primarily on the testimony of the step‑brother (PW‑1) and the post‑mortem report indicating …

RAM SHARAN MAURYA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 646Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to fix minimum qualifying marks of 65% for General and 60% for reserved candidates in the 2019 Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination (ATRE-2019) after the exam had been conducted, and to allow B.Ed. candidates to …

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OFversusUDAYANT MALHOUTRA

2020 INSC 647Disposed off

The case concerned an appeal by SEBI against an order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal that set aside an ex‑parte interim order passed by SEBI’s Whole Time Member directing the respondent, the CEO and MD of Dynamatic Technologies Ltd, to deposit Rs 3.83 crore in an escrow account. SEBI alleged …

RATTAN SINGH & ORS.versusNIRMAL GILL & ORS. ETC.

2020 INSC 641Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined civil suits filed by Joginder Kaur (deceased) represented by Nirmal Gill, seeking to declare a 1990 General Power of Attorney (GPA) and related sale deeds as fraudulent and void. The lower courts had held the documents genuine, but the High Court reversed that finding, …

NTPC LTD. (SIMHADRI PROJECT)versusRAJIV CHAKRABORTY

2020 INSC 642Disposed off

The appeal arose from a corporate insolvency resolution process under the IBC where the appellant’s claim was listed in the Information Memorandum (IM) under “List of Other Creditors” rather than under “Claims of Operational Creditors”. The appellant contended that the classification was incorrect …

UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2020 INSC 643Appeal(s) allowed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) awarded a recruitment contract to UMC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (appellant). After a written exam, police seized documents that appeared to be leaked question papers, prompting FCI to issue a show‑cause notice on 10‑04‑2018 alleging breach of bid conditions. The …

VETINDIA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 639Appeal(s) allowed

Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a licensed drug manufacturer, challenged an order of blacklisting issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh on 8 September 2009, alleging that it had never supplied the disputed veterinary injection under the tender and that the show‑cause notice did not specifically …

SHANTI DEVI ALIAS SHANTI MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 632Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shanti Devi, sought to revive a writ petition filed by her late husband, a retired Coal India employee, challenging the stoppage of his pension and a demand for repayment of over Rs 8 lakhs. The earlier petition for refund of a smaller amount had been dismissed by the Patna High Court …

GURUSIMRAN SINGH NARULAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2020 INSC 635Disposed off

The petitioner filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking an immediate ban on the use of chemical or organic disinfectant tunnels and ultraviolet (UV) rays on human beings, alleging that such practices violate the right to health under Article 21. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare …

C. BRIGHTversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS.

2020 INSC 633Dismissed

The appellant C. Bright challenged a Kerala High Court order that held Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, which obliges a District Magistrate to deliver possession of a secured asset within 30 days (extendable to 60), is a directory provision. The Supreme Court examined the language of the provision, …

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 634Appeal(s) allowed

A complaint was lodged in 1989 alleging adulteration of Dalda Vanaspati Ghee manufactured by Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). The trial magistrate initially absolved the company’s directors and continued prosecution against the nominated officer, Nirmal Sen, who was later convicted under the …

HITESH VERMAversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2020 INSC 636Disposed off

The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged a charge‑sheet filed under Sections 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(e) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the FIR was based on a property dispute and was false. The High Court dismissed …

RAJNESHversusNEHA & ANR.

2020 INSC 631Disposed off

The husband appealed against a Family Court order granting interim maintenance of Rs 15,000 per month to his wife and Rs 10,000 per month to his son under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., which was affirmed by the Bombay High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' orders, directed the husband …

SHRI RAM SAHU (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusVINOD KUMAR RAWAT & ORS.

2020 INSC 627Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shri Ram Sahu (deceased) through LRS, filed a suit seeking declaration that a 1995 sale deed was void and a permanent injunction against the defendants. The trial court dismissed the suit; the appellant appealed to the High Court, which also dismissed the appeal but observed that the …

RAJESH @ SARKARI & ANRversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2020 INSC 628Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Rajesh alias Sarkari and Ajay Hooda were convicted for murder under IPC s.302 r/w s.34 based on the testimony of the victim's father (PW‑4) and brother (PW‑5) who claimed to have witnessed the shooting and taken the victim to the hospital. The Supreme Court examined inconsistencies in …

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.versusK. FAZLUR RAHMAN & ANR.

2020 INSC 630Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, constituted on 10‑Oct‑2017, comprised 11 members, including elected and nominated representatives. After the term of a Member of Parliament expired in May 2019, the State Government argued that elected members were fewer than nominated members and, invoking Section 99(1) …

CHIEF MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR.V. ANIT KUMAR DASversusANIT KUMAR DAS

2020 INSC 629Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab National Bank advertised for the post of Peon, specifying that only candidates who had passed the 12th standard and were not graduates were eligible. Anit Kumar Das, a graduate, applied claiming to be a 12th pass and was selected, but the bank later discovered his graduate status and …

M/S. IMPERIA STRUCTURES LTD.versusANIL PATNI AND ANOTHER

2020 INSC 625Dismissed

The appellant, Imperia Structures Ltd., launched a housing scheme in 2011 and entered builder‑buyer agreements with the respondents in 2013. After the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) came into force, the respondents filed consumer complaints alleging delay and deficiency, …

SHATRUGHNA BABAN MESHRAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2020 INSC 624Case Partly allowed

A two‑and‑a‑half‑year‑old girl was abducted, brutally raped and murdered by her maternal uncle, Shatrughna Baban Meshram. The trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 302, 376(1), 376(2)(f,i,m) and 376A of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, imposing death sentences on the charges of …

TOFAN SINGHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2020 INSC 620Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered whether officers invested with powers under Section 53 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) are 'police officers' within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and whether a statement recorded under Section 67 of the …

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusHEEM SINGH

2020 INSC 621Appeal(s) allowed

Heem Singh, a Rajasthan police constable, was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misconduct for allegedly committing murder while on leave. He had been acquitted of the murder charge in a criminal trial because key witnesses turned hostile and the prosecution failed to prove …

CHUNTHURAMversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2020 INSC 616Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Chunthuram and co-accused Jagan Ram were convicted for the murder of Laxman under IPC sections 302 and 34. The Supreme Court examined the prosecution's evidence, finding that the recovered weapons were never forensic‑linked to the crime, the chemical analysis report was missing, and a …

THOMAS LAWRENCEversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2020 INSC 617Disposed off

The petitioner, Thomas Lawrence, filed a PIL alleging mass destruction of wetlands and a 10‑acre pond within the Technopark campus in Thiruvananthapuram. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on 19 December 2018 directed the District Collector to take action within a month. The Collector, on 30 April …

MRS RITIKA SHARANversusMR SUJOY GHOSH

2020 INSC 615Disposed off

The parties, married in 2009, have been living apart since 2016, with the mother, Mrs. Ritika Sharan, caring for their son Sattik while employed in Singapore. The father, Mr. Sujoy Ghosh, obtained interim orders from the Family Court restraining the mother from taking the child out of Bengaluru and …

DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 614Disposed off

The appellants, holders of mining leases in Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, sought extension of their leases for periods during which mining was prohibited by orders of the National Green Tribunal and subsequent state notifications. The State argued that neither the Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals …

SATYAMA DUBEY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 612Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions and intervention applications filed under Article 32 seeking a fair investigation into the gang‑rape and murder of a 19‑year‑old girl in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, and alleging illegal cremation of the victim. The State Government had already ordered …

M. RAVINDRANversusTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE

2020 INSC 608Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, accused under the NDPS Act, was remanded to judicial custody on 4 August 2018. After the statutory period of 180 days elapsed on 31 January 2019, he filed an application for default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC on 1 February 2019, offering to furnish bail. While the bail …

RAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2020 INSC 606Dismissed

The appellant Raveen Kumar was stopped by police near the HP‑J&K border and charas weighing 1 kg 230 g was seized from his van. The trial court acquitted him, relying on a prosecution reply to a bail application that suggested prior knowledge of the appellant, deeming the seizure not a "chance …

RAJESH DHIMANversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2020 INSC 607Dismissed

The appellants, Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana, were stopped by police while riding a motorcycle and a search of a backpack on Dhiman yielded 3.1 kg of charas. The trial court acquitted them, holding that the prosecution had not proved the charge beyond reasonable doubt, especially because the …

STATE OF U.P.versusSUDHIR KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.

2020 INSC 603Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh State Warehousing Corporation repeatedly cancelled e‑tenders for handling and transport of foodgrains, eventually terminating the contract awarded to Sudhir Kumar Singh (Respondent No.1). Singh filed a writ petition under Art.226 challenging the cancellation, alleging a breach of …

NAVIN CHANDRA DHOUNDIYALversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS.

2020 INSC 604Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, professors at Kumaun University, challenged an office order that fixed their retirement dates as the last day of the month in which they turned 65, invoking Statute No. 16.24 which they argued allowed continuation of service until 30 June of the following year. The High Court had …

SATISH CHANDER AHUJAversusSNEHA AHUJA

2020 INSC 599Dismissed

Satish Chander Ahuja, the father‑in‑law, owned a house in New Delhi and sued his daughter‑in‑law Sneha Ahuja for mandatory and permanent injunction to remove her from the first floor. Sneha had earlier filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, …

STATE OF U.P.versusGAYATRI PRASAD PRAJAPATI

2020 INSC 601Appeal(s) allowed

The former minister Gayatri Prasad Prajapati, accused of offences under Sections 376D, 376, 511, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, was admitted to King George Medical University (KGMU) for treatment of multiple ailments and later shifted to the super‑specialty Sanjay Gandhi …

SARAVANANversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 600Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Saravanan, was arrested for an offence under Section 420 IPC and remanded to judicial custody. He obtained regular bail under Section 437 CrPC on the condition that his wife would deposit Rs.7,00,000, a condition he failed to fulfil. After more than 101 days in jail without a …

GANESANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 596Dismissed

Ganesan was convicted under Section 7 read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 based solely on the testimony of a 13‑year‑old victim (PW‑3). The trial court sentenced him to three years’ rigorous imprisonment (the minimum under Section 8) and ordered …

RAGHUNATH (D) BY LRS.versusRADHA MOHAN (D) THR. LRS & ORS.

2020 INSC 590Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered a suit filed in 1974 by a co‑sharer seeking to enforce his pre‑emptive right over a sale of a property in Ajmer. The property had previously been transferred in 1945, 1946 and on 5 Nov 1966, the latter after the Rajasthan Pre‑Emption Act, 1966 came into force. The issue …

ANIL BHARDWAJversusTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 591Dismissed

Anil Bhardwaj was selected for the post of District Judge (Entry Level) in Madhya Pradesh but was declared ineligible after a committee found a criminal case (FIR under IPC sections 498A, 406, 34) pending against him. The committee’s decision, based on the pending case, led to his name being deleted …

BIKRAMJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2020 INSC 589Appeal(s) allowed

A hand grenade attack at a public gathering in Amritsar resulted in three deaths and 22 serious injuries. Bikramjit Singh was arrested, remanded to custody, and after 90 days (which expired on 21‑02‑2019) he applied for default bail; the Sub‑Divisional Judicial Magistrate dismissed the application, …

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT.) LTD.versusP. GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) & ORS.

2020 INSC 586Appeal(s) allowed

Ferro... Ltd. entered into a 1980 agreement to sell land to the defendants, which required the vendor to obtain permission under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1978. The defendants failed to secure the permission, prompting the appellant to sue for specific performance. The …

ANAND YADAV & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 588Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the eligibility of candidates holding a Master of Education (M.Ed.) degree for the post of Assistant Professor (Education) in Uttar Pradesh universities. The Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Service Selection Commission (UPHESSC) initially rejected an M.Ed. holder, but later issued …

AMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2020 INSC 587Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the murder of Devinder Singh, who was allegedly attacked by three accused wielding hockey sticks and a knife. The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the testimony of Parminder Singh (PW‑1), a brother of the deceased, while the other two eye‑witnesses turned hostile. The …

ASHISH SETHversusSUMIT MITTAL AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 585Directions issued

The Supreme Court dealt with a contempt petition filed by the Seth Group against the Mittal Group arising from a joint‑venture dispute over land development, license renewal and EDC liabilities. Both parties had executed a Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) on 4 May 2015, which the Court incorporated …

KARULAL & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 582Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 148, 302 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Madhavji. The prosecution relied on three eyewitnesses—two of whom were close relatives of the deceased and one unrelated witness—whose testimonies were consistent and corroborated by medical …

MISS ‘AversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

2020 INSC 580Appeal(s) allowed

Miss A alleged sexual exploitation and her father lodged a complaint, leading to FIRs and the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). The victim's statement was recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, after which the accused (Respondent No.2) applied for a certified copy of that statement. …

ANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 581Appeal(s) allowed

Three postgraduate medical students were suspended from their college and hospital after a FIR was lodged alleging they were responsible for a junior colleague's suicide. The suspension was based solely on the FIR, not on a prima facie finding under Section 6(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition of …

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR.versusUMESH KUMAR

2020 INSC 578Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Police advertised 523 vacancies for Constable (Executive) in 2013. After the written exam, a provisional list was issued on 13 July 2015, but a bonus mark for candidates taller than 178 cm was omitted, prompting a revised list on 17 July 2015 that included the respondents, Umesh Kumar and …

SATYA DEO @ BHOOREYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2020 INSC 577Directions issued

The appellant Satya Deo was convicted of murder under IPC s.302 r/w s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He claimed he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (aged 16 years 7 months) and sought relief under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Supreme Court …

AMIT SAHNIversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.

2020 INSC 579Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the occupation of the Kalindi Kunj‑Shaheen Bagh stretch, including the Okhla underpass, by protesters opposing the Citizenship Amendment Act, arguing that it violated their right to protest under Articles 19(1)(a) and (b). The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ without …

T. K. DAVIDversusKURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 576Dismissed

The petitioner, a former employee of Kuruppampady Service Co‑operative Bank, challenged his compulsory retirement through a series of proceedings, including a writ petition, writ appeal and a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in 2015, all of which were dismissed. He later filed a review petition in the …

PARVEZ NOORDIN LOKHANDWALLAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2020 INSC 573Disposed off

The appellant, an Indian citizen and US Green Card holder, was charged in 2014 with forgery and related offences under the IPC and was arrested in 2020. The High Court granted him eight weeks of interim bail but refused to relax the conditions to allow travel to the United States, despite his …

M/S. MAGMA FINCORP LTD.versusRAJESH KUMAR TIWARI

2020 INSC 574Case Allowed

M/S. Magma FinCorp Ltd., the financier, entered into a hire‑purchase agreement with Rajesh Kumar Tiwari for a vehicle. Tiwari paid seven instalments before the financier repossessed the vehicle without a notice addressed to his correct address and later sold it. Tiwari filed a consumer complaint …

PRAVASI LEGAL CELL & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 575Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a batch of public interest writ petitions filed by passenger groups, travel agents and others seeking full refunds of air‑fares for tickets cancelled due to the COVID‑19 lockdown and the ban on domestic and international flights. The Ministry of Civil Aviation had issued an …

GUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2020 INSC 572Appeal(s) allowed

The Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha and a national trade union challenged two Gujarat State notifications issued under Section 5 of the Factories Act, 1948 that exempted all factories from provisions on working hours, rest intervals and overtime pay during the COVID‑19 pandemic. The petitioners argued that …

GURCHARAN SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2020 INSC 570Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gurcharan Singh was convicted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for abetting the suicide of his wife, Shinder Kaur, who died after ingesting aluminium phosphide. The trial court and the High Court upheld the conviction despite the absence of direct evidence of cruelty, dowry …

SUBED ALI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

2020 INSC 566Dismissed

The State of Assam prosecuted Subed Ali and others for the murder of two men who were returning from a market on bicycles. The accused were alleged to have intercepted, assaulted, and killed the victims; one died on the spot and the other later in hospital. Five persons were originally charged, but …

SATISH @ SABBEversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2020 INSC 567Disposed off

The petitioners, Satish and Vikky, were convicted of kidnapping for ransom and sentenced to life imprisonment. They applied for premature release on probation under Section 2 of the Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938, but the State repeatedly rejected their pleas without applying …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusAMIT SHRIVAS

2020 INSC 565Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Amit Shrivas claimed a compassionate appointment after his father, a work‑charged driver, died in service; the father had become a permanent employee after 15 years but was still paid from the contingency fund. The 2008 Madhya Pradesh policy excluded work‑charged/contingency employees …

MAHESHWAR TIGGAversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND

2020 INSC 564Appeal(s) allowed

Maheshwar Tigga was convicted by the trial court and the Jharkhand High Court for rape, voluntarily causing hurt and wrongful restraint under Sections 376, 323 and 341 IPC, based on the prosecutrix’s allegation that he assaulted her when she was a minor. The Supreme Court examined whether the …

ANWAR ALI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2020 INSC 563Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Anwar Ali and another were convicted by the Himachal Pradesh High Court for murder and related offences based on circumstantial evidence, overturning a trial court acquittal. The trial court had found material contradictions in the prosecution's version of the recovery of a knife, …

BELI RAMversusRAJINDER KUMAR & ANR.

2020 INSC 560Dismissed

The plaintiff Beli Ram, owner of a truck, employed a driver who had been driving with an expired licence for nearly three years. The driver suffered a road accident resulting in 20% permanent disability and claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The High Court held the …

SRI NILANJAN BHATTACHARYAversusTHE STATE OF KARANATAKA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 562Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Indian citizen residing in the US, sought temporary custody of his three‑year‑old US‑citizen son after the mother returned to India with the child. The Superior Court of New Jersey granted the appellant temporary custody, and the appellant filed a habeas corpus petition in the …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S G S CHATHA RICE MILLS & ANR.

2020 INSC 561Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether Notification 5/2019, issued under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act to raise the import duty on goods from Pakistan to 200%, applied retrospectively to bills of entry that had been presented and self‑assessed before the notification was uploaded to the …

STATE OF KERALA & ANR. ETC. ETC.versusM/S RDS PROJECT LIMITED & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2020 INSC 559Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala ordered the demolition and reconstruction of the Palarivattom flyover after a High Level Committee, comprising senior engineers, accepted Dr. E. Sreedharan's recommendation that a new structure would guarantee a 100‑year service life, despite earlier reports from IIT Madras …

B. SANTOSHAMMA & ANR.versusD. SARALA & ANR.

2020 INSC 556Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the vendor, upholding the lower courts' decree that the vendee was entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement for the remaining 200 square yards of land after the vendor had already conveyed 100 square yards to a third party. The court …

SAGUFA AHMED & ORS.versusUPPER ASSAM PLYWOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 555Dismissed

The appellants, shareholders of Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd., sought winding up of the company before the NCLT, which dismissed their petition on 25 October 2019. They applied for a certified copy of the order, received it on 19 December 2019, and filed an appeal before the NCLAT on 20 …

TRUSTEES OF H.C. DHANDA TRUSTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 551Case Partly allowed

The H.C. Dhanda Trust executed a Deed of Assent to vest two immovable properties in its beneficiaries, paying only Rs.200 stamp duty. The Collector of Stamps treated the deed as a gift deed, levied a deficit duty of Rs.1.28 crore and imposed a ten‑times penalty of Rs.12.80 crore, which was upheld by …

M/S. MSD REAL ESTATE LLPversusTHE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS & ANR.

2020 INSC 554Disposed off

The appellant, M/s. MSD Real Estate LLP, purchased the Lantern Hotel, a property that was earlier declared a gift deed and found to have a deficiency in stamp duty. The Collector of Stamps imposed a penalty of ten times the duty, which the Supreme Court later reduced to five times. While the stamp …

PAPPU DEO YADAVversusNARESH KUMAR AND ORS.

2020 INSC 553Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a 20‑year‑old data‑entry operator, lost his right hand in a motor‑vehicle accident and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal assessed his disability at 89% but reduced it to 45% and used a monthly income of Rs 8,000, omitting a 50% …

NEETU KUMAR NAGAICHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 549Case Allowed

Neetu Kumar Nagaich, the mother of a 21‑year‑old law student who died under suspicious circumstances, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a de novo investigation of the homicide after alleging serious deficiencies in the Rajasthan police investigation and the filing of a closure report. …

BALASORE ALLOYS LIMITEDversusMEDIMA LLC

2020 INSC 550Dismissed

Balasore Alloys Ltd filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator based on Clause 7 of 37 purchase orders. Medima LLC contended that the parties were bound by an earlier ‘Umbrella’ (Pricing) Agreement dated …

JUGUT RAMversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2020 INSC 547Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Jugut Ram, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder after assaulting the deceased with a lathi during a land dispute, the victim dying a day later. He appealed, arguing that a lathi is a common village implement and that the prosecution failed to prove an intention to cause …

ABHILASHAversusPARKASH & ORS.

2020 INSC 546Dismissed

The appellant, Abhilasha, a Hindu daughter, challenged a lower court order that limited her maintenance from her father, Parkash, to the period until she attained majority, arguing that under Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 she could claim maintenance until she …

JEET RAMversusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHANDIGARH

2020 INSC 545Case Partly allowed

The appellant Jeet Ram was charged under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of 13 kg of charas seized from a dhaba he managed. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution lacked independent witnesses, that Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not complied with, and that the evidence …

PRAVIN KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 542Dismissed

Pravin Kumar, a CISF Sub‑Inspector, was accused of fabricating a General Diary entry, intimidating a subordinate to give false testimony, and collecting bribes from BPCL contractors. An enquiry under CISF Rules found him guilty and recommended dismissal; the disciplinary authority dismissed him, and …

RIZWAN KHANversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2020 INSC 543Dismissed

The appellant Rizwan Khan was seized with 20 kg of ganja from a motorcycle and convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the ND PS Act. He challenged the conviction on several grounds, including that the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses, that the procedural requirements of Sections 42 and …

STALINversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 540Case Partly allowed

Stalin, the accused, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a knife during a quarrel at a beer party. He appealed, arguing that the single blow and lack of pre‑meditation should reduce the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 …

SHREYAS SINHAversusTHE WEST BENGAL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF JURIDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.

2020 INSC 541Dismissed

Shreyas Sinha applied for admission to the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS) for the 2019‑2020 academic session, invoking the 30% reservation for West Bengal domiciles introduced by the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2018, which came …

M/S BANGALORE CLUBversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX & ANR.

2020 INSC 536Appeal(s) allowed

The Bangalore Club, a social club, challenged an assessment that it was liable to wealth tax under Section 21AA of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The Assessing Officer and the CIT (Appeals) held the club liable, but the Appellate Tribunal set aside those orders. The Supreme Court examined the meaning of …

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSMT. SOMWATI AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 535Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court heard a series of appeals filed by three insurance companies challenging the awards of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for "loss of consortium" and a separate head of "loss of love and affection" granted by various High Courts and Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. …

THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusSWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY & ORS.

2020 INSC 533Appeal(s) allowed

The Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., a financial creditor, filed a Section 7 petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against M/s Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., the corporate debtor. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) approved a resolution plan submitted by M/s Sai Agro …

R. POORNIMA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 534Dismissed

The petitioners, directly recruited District Judges in Tamil Nadu (2011), claimed they were senior to promotee judges but were overlooked for elevation to the Madras High Court. They argued that, under Article 217(2) of the Constitution, their prior advocacy experience should be clubbed with their …

M/S BANDEKAR BROTHERS PVT. LTD. & ANRversusPRASAD VASSUDEV KENI, ETC. ETC

2020 INSC 531Disposed off

The appellants, M/s Bande\u200bkar Brothers Pvt. Ltd., were in a business dispute with the respondents and filed civil suits, after which they lodged criminal complaints alleging false evidence and forged debit notes under IPC sections 191, 192 and 193. The magistrate converted these complaints into …

ILANGOVANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2020 INSC 530Dismissed

The appellant was convicted for murder and causing injuries after allegedly attacking the complainant and the deceased with an iron rod during a family feud. The trial court sentenced him under Sections 302 and 324 IPC, while acquitting three co‑accused who were relatives of the appellant. On …

M/S. L. R. BROTHERS INDO FLORA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2020 INSC 525Dismissed

M/s L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) producing cut flowers, imported inputs duty‑free under Notification No. 126/94-Cus but sold a portion of its produce in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) without the required approval of the Development Commissioner and without …

THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ORS.versusM/S. THE ANDHRA PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED

2020 INSC 526Appeal(s) allowed

Andhra Petrochemicals Ltd. sought anti‑dumping duty on imports of normal butanol and related chemicals from Saudi Arabia and other countries, alleging dumping and injury. The Designated Authority (DA) terminated the investigation, finding insufficient data and an inadequate period to establish …

SARIKAversusADMINISTRATOR, MAHAKALESHWAR MANDIR COMMITTEE, UJJAIN (M.P.) & ORS.

2020 INSC 528Dismissed

The Supreme Court was monitoring compliance of its earlier order directing an Expert Committee of ASI and GSI to examine erosion of the Shivalinga at Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple, Ujjain. The Committee’s report dated 19‑01‑2019 identified ongoing physical and chemical deterioration of the lingam, …

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LIMITED & ANR.

2020 INSC 521Case Partly allowed

Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (JVVNL) entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. (APRL) in 2010, basing the tariff on domestic coal supply. APRL later claimed additional compensation under the PPA’s change‑in‑law clause after the New Coal Distribution Policy of …

DR. VIJAY MALLYAversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 523Dismissed

The Supreme Court had earlier held Dr. Vijay Mallya guilty of contempt for failing to disclose assets and violating injunctions, ordering punishment. Mallya filed review petitions (Nos. 2175‑2178) contending that the Court erred by stating he had not filed a reply to the banks' response, when a …

IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR.versusIN RE:

2020 INSC 489Disposed off

The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu criminal contempt petition against senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, affirmed his conviction for scandalising the judiciary through tweets and an affidavit alleging misconduct by judges. The Court held that the defence of truth under Section 13 of the Contempt …

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2018 INSC 332Disposed off

The petitions challenged the validity of Regulation 9 of the Medical Council of India (MCI) Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, alleging that it barred State governments from reserving seats for in‑service doctors in postgraduate degree courses. The Court examined the constitutional …

MUKESH SINGHversusSTATE (NARCOTIC BRANCH OF DELHI)

2020 INSC 524Reference answered

Mukesh Singh challenged his conviction under the NDPS Act on the ground that the police officer who lodged the FIR was also the investigating officer, alleging that this dual role vitiated the trial. The Supreme Court examined the statutory scheme of the CrPC (ss.154, 156, 157) and the NDPS Act …

UNION OF INDIAversusASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 517Disposed off

The Union of India challenged a High Court order that quashed an FIR registered under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for the alleged sale of unlicensed drugs, holding that prosecution for offences under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 must be initiated only by persons named in …

M/S. RADHA EXPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LIMITEDversusK.P. JAYARAM & ANR.

2020 INSC 518Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, K.P. Jayaram and another, filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) claiming they were financial creditors of M/s. Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd. for a loan of Rs.2.10 crore advanced between 2002 and 2005, alleging that part of the loan was …

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX,versusM/S. ADANI GAS LTD.

2020 INSC 513Dismissed

The Commissioner of Service Tax appealed against M/s. Adani Gas Ltd. challenging the taxability of charges collected for supplying pipelines and measurement (SKID) equipment to gas consumers. The issue was whether Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 applied, i.e., whether the supply of …

PRANEETH K. AND ORS.versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) AND ORS.

2020 INSC 519Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines dated 06 July 2020, which required all Indian universities to complete final year examinations by 30 September 2020 amid the COVID‑19 pandemic. Petitioners argued that the guidelines …

THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusDAVINDER SINGH & ORS.

2020 INSC 512Directions issued

The State of Punjab enacted Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006, reserving 50% of SC quota for Balmikis and Mazhabi Sikhs. The High Court struck down this provision, relying on E.V. Chinnaiah, and the Supreme Court dismissed a related …

NAZIR MOHAMEDversusJ. KAMALA AND ORS.

2020 INSC 511Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the CPC concerning a suit for declaration of title and possession of a property. The High Court had entertained the appeals despite the absence of a substantial question of law, and had allowed the respondent's claim to …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusAGRICAS LLP AND OTHERS ETC.

2020 INSC 508Disposed off

The Union of India amended the import policy for peas and other pulses, shifting them from a free to a restricted category and imposing quantitative import limits through notifications and a trade notice issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). Importers …

V. SUKUMARANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.

2020 INSC 510Appeal(s) allowed

V. Sukumaran, who had worked for over seven years as a Casual Labour Roll (CLR) employee in the Kerala Fisheries Department, later entered government service through a regular recruitment process and retired as an Upper Division Clerk. He claimed that his CLR service should be counted as qualifying …

NARASAMMA & ORS.versusA. KRISHNAPPA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

2020 INSC 509Dismissed

The plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, sued the defendant’s wife, Smt. Narasamma, for possession of a schedule property, claiming full ownership and seeking removal of a temporary structure. The defendant relied on an unregistered sale agreement dated 10‑10‑1976 and a General Power of Attorney dated …

STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusRAKESH SETHI & ANR.

2020 INSC 506Appeal(s) allowed

The Madhya Pradesh High Court struck down Rule 55A of the State Motor Vehicles Rules, which imposed fees for reserving specific vehicle registration numbers, holding it ultra vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The State appealed, arguing that under …

RAJ PAL SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HARYANA, ROHTAK

2020 INSC 505Dismissed

The appellant owned land that was leased to a college; the lease expired in 1967 and the Haryana Government issued a notification for compulsory acquisition on 15 May 1968, later making an award on 29 September 1970. The dispute centered on when capital gains under Section 45 of the Income‑Tax Act, …

SRI V.N. KRISHNA MURTHY & ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSRI RAVIKUMAR & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2020 INSC 502Dismissed

The owners of certain land executed an agreement to sell to a housing society and also a General Power of Attorney (GPA) authorising the society's officers to sell the property. Sale deeds in favour of the appellants were later executed under the GPA. The respondents filed suits seeking cancellation …

AVITEL POST STUDIOZ LIMITED & ORS.versusHSBC PI HOLDINGS (MAURITIUS) LIMITED

2020 INSC 498Disposed off

Avitel Post Studioz Ltd and its promoters invested USD 60 million in HSBC based on alleged representations that Avitel would secure a lucrative BBC contract, which later proved to be fictitious. HSBC obtained interim awards and a foreign final award from a Singapore tribunal finding the appellants …

DECCAN PAPER MILLS CO. LTD.versusREGENCY MAHAVIR PROPERTIES & ORS.

2020 INSC 497Dismissed

Deccan Paper Mills entered into a development agreement with Ashray, which was later assigned to Regency Mahavir Properties containing an arbitration clause. Deccan alleged fraud by a partner of Regency and filed a suit under the Specific Relief Act, seeking cancellation of the 2006 agreement and a …

GHANSHYAM UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2020 INSC 499Dismissed

Ghanshyam Upadhyay, a lawyer, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking the dissolution of a Commission of Inquiry that was set up to investigate the alleged encounter killing of Vikas Dubey. He alleged bias and conflict of interest against the Commission's Chairman, Justice B.S. Chauhan, and …

MOHD. ANWARversusTHE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

2020 INSC 496Dismissed

The appellant, Mohd. Anwar, was accused of robbing a motorist with two accomplices, using a knife and a revolver, and extorting Rs.30,000. The trial court convicted him of robbery with hurt and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment, which the High Court reduced to two years under Section 394 IPC …

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONversusUNION OF INDIA

2020 INSC 494Dismissed

The Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed a writ petition seeking a fresh National Disaster Management Plan, specific minimum relief standards, and direction to use the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) for COVID-19, as well as to channel all contributions to the NDRF instead of the PM …

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 492Directions issued

The Supreme Court revisited a writ petition filed in 1985 concerning environmental and land‑use violations in Delhi. The Court examined whether the Monitoring Committee, appointed in 2006 to curb the misuse of residential premises for commercial purposes, had the authority to seal residential …

BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJARversusVEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 490Appeal(s) allowed

The corporate debtor Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries defaulted on its loans on 08 July 2011. The financial creditor, JM Financial Assets Reconstruction Company, filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in March 2018 to initiate a corporate insolvency …

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusM/S. K.C. SHARMA & CO. & ORS.

2020 INSC 488Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court order that set aside a 1989 decree passed under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which had awarded 87% of compensation to the respondents and 13% to the Gaon Sabha. The appellants alleged that the decree was obtained by …

PREET PAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2020 INSC 493Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a conviction of Sandeep Singh Hora for offences under Sections 304B, 498A, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, including life imprisonment. While the appeal against the conviction was pending, the Allahabad High Court granted him bail under Section 389 of …

IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR.versusIN RE:

2020 INSC 489Directions issued

The Supreme Court, acting suo motu, took cognizance of two tweets posted by advocate Prashant Bhushan that alleged the Chief Justice of India was riding a luxury motorcycle while keeping the Court in "lockdown" and that the Supreme Court had facilitated the destruction of democracy. The Court …

VINEETA SHARMAversusRAKESH SHARMA & ORS.

2020 INSC 487Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. It held that the amendment confers coparcenary status on daughters—whether born before or after the amendment—on and from 9 September 2005, giving …

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.versusISRO DRIVERS ASSOCIATION

2020 INSC 484Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the Government of India challenging the recognition of a service association formed by ISRO drivers. The respondents sought recognition under the Central Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules, 1993, claiming that drivers constitute a …

HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUSTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 482Appeal(s) allowed

The Hari Krishna Mandir Trust, holding Plot No.473‑B3 and an adjoining private road, sought correction of a Town Planning Scheme that erroneously recorded the road as owned by Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). The High Court dismissed the trust's writ petition, holding that the land had vested in …

BRAHAMPAL @ SAMMAY AND ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

2020 INSC 483Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased died in a road accident and his parents claimed compensation before the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, which awarded Rs.2.24 lakh. They filed an appeal to the High Court for enhancement 45 days after the 90‑day limit, citing the illness of the appellant's wife as the reason for delay. …

RAMA NAND AND ORS.versusCHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

2020 INSC 481Dismissed

The appellants, who were Telephone Operators in the Delhi Fire Service, were reorganised as Radio Telephone Operators (RTOs) with a higher pay scale, a requirement of at least five years of service and a specialised training programme. They claimed that this conversion was merely a re‑description of …

M/S EXL CAREERS AND ANOTHERversusFRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

2020 INSC 477Disposed off

The appellant, EXL Careers, filed a suit for recovery in a Gurgaon civil court despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause in a franchise agreement that designated Delhi courts as the sole forum. The Gurgaon court returned the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC, and the High Court ordered its …

JANHIT ABHIYANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 475Directions issued

The petitioners challenged the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, which inserted clauses 15(6) and 16(6) permitting a 10% reservation for economically weaker sections in educational institutions and public employment. They argued that the amendment violated the basic structure …

GANGADHAR ALIAS GANGARAMversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2020 INSC 478Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for the recovery of 48 kg of cannabis from a house that the trial court deemed his based on a 2008 voters list. He contended that he had sold the house to a co‑accused on 12 June 2009 and produced the sale …

SUKH SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 474Dismissed

The Gujarat Sukh Sagar Medical College & Hospital Trust obtained an Essentiality Certificate in 2014 to establish a medical college in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Despite conditional permission for the 2016‑17 academic year, the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly denied renewal of permission …

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL & ORS.versusMANJIT KAUR & ORS.

2019 INSC 869Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dispute over two adjoining land parcels (Khasra Nos. 935/1 and 935/2) where the predecessor of the appellants, Harbans Singh, claimed exclusive ownership based on a family settlement. A memorandum of family settlement (Exhibit P‑6) dated 10‑03‑1988 was executed by the brothers. …

B.B.M. ENTERPRISESversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

2020 INSC 472Disposed off

B.B.M. Enterprises obtained an arbitral award on 16 September 2009 for Rs. 1.38 crore plus interest and costs. The award was executed, but the award‑challenging petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed on 2 April 2010, well beyond the 120‑day limitation …

DR. ASWATHY R. S. KARTHIKA & ORS.versusDR. ARCHANA M. & ORS.

2020 INSC 470Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of the Hindu Nadar community, sought to have the shortfall in the 1% reservation granted to their community (effective from 21‑Nov‑2009) adjusted in future vacancies without disturbing earlier appointments. They argued that Rule 15(a) of the Kerala State and Subordinate …

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANYversusINCOME TAX OFFICER

2020 INSC 468Dismissed

Shree Choudhary Transport Company (the appellant) entered into a contract to transport cement for a consignor and hired independent truck operators to perform the work. The appellant received freight charges from the consignor after TDS was deducted, but failed to deduct TDS on payments to the truck …

PARMINDER KAUR @ P.P. KAUR @ SONIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2020 INSC 467Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Parminder Kaur, a single woman living with her child and mother, was convicted under IPC sections 366A and 506 for allegedly enticing a minor girl to illicit intercourse with her tenant boy and for threatening the victim’s brother. The prosecution’s case rested on the testimony of the …

ERUDHAYA PRIYAversusSTATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD.

2020 INSC 466Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 23‑year‑old software engineer, was injured in a bus‑accident caused by the negligent driving of a State Express Transport Corporation bus, sustaining a permanent disability of 31.1%. She filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims …