Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

214 judgments · newest first · showing 201–214

THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA BAGALKOTE DISTRICT, BAGALKOTversusCHANDRASHEKAR & ANR.

2026 INSC 31Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Lokayukta initiated criminal prosecution against an Executive Engineer (Electrical) accused of demanding a bribe after a successful trap set up by the Anti‑Corruption Bureau. The department’s disciplinary enquiry later exonerated the officer on technical grounds, prompting him to seek …

DALSUKHBHAI BACHUBHAI SATASIA & OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS

2026 INSC 21Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were sub‑plot owners of a 9,303 sq m parcel in Surat that had been declared excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (ULC Act). The State issued a notice under s.10(5) of the ULC Act only to the original landowner, not to the appellants who were in actual …

DIVJOT SEKHONversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 26Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners challenged the Punjab government's alteration of the sports‑quota admission criteria for MBBS/BDS courses, which expanded the "zone of consideration" from Classes XI‑XII to include Classes IX‑X after applications had been filed. They argued that the mid‑stream change was arbitrary, …

GOLDEN FOOD PRODUCTS INDIAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & OTHERS

2026 INSC 22Appeal(s) allowed

The Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) conducted an open auction for a 3,150‑sq‑m industrial plot, fixing a reserve price of Rs.25,600 per sq m. Golden Food Products India submitted the highest financial bid of Rs.29,500 per sq m, which was accepted as the highest bid. The GDA later cancelled the …

ABHAY KUMAR PATEL & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2026 INSC 24

The Bihar Road Construction Department issued recruitment advertisements in 2019 for Assistant Engineer posts under the Bihar Engineering Services Class‑II Recruitment Rules, 2019. The written examinations were held in March 2022 and provisional merit lists were published in June‑July 2022. After …

MOTILAL OSWAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDversusSANTOSH CORDEIRO AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 5Dismissed

The dispute arose from a Leave and License Agreement between Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. and Santosh Cordeiro, which contained an arbitration clause in Clause 33. The respondent filed a Section 11 application under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole …

DHARMENDRA SHARMAversusM. ARUNMOZHI & ANR.

2026 INSC 10Disposed off

The petitioner, Dharmendra Sharma, filed contempt petitions alleging that respondent No.1 (M. Arunmozhi) willfully failed to refund Rs.3,99,100, the cost of non‑judicial stamp papers, as directed by the Supreme Court in Dharmendra Sharma v. Agra Development Authority (2025) 1 SCC 422. The respondent …

M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2026 INSC 4Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd., was awarded four road‑maintenance contracts under the Kerala State Transport Project and, after disputes over payments, referred the matters to an adjudicator under the contract’s General Conditions. The adjudicator decided in favour of the appellant on …

BHADRA INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

2026 INSC 6Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a consortium formed by Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Novia International Consulting Aps, entered into a license agreement with the Airports Authority of India (AAI) that provided for arbitration by a sole arbitrator appointed by the AAI Chairman. After disputes arose in …

NAK ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT. LTD.versusTARUN KESHRICHAND SHAH AND ORS.

2026 INSC 8Dismissed

The suit was filed by the heirs of a property owner to recover service charges from a sub-tenant, respondent No.3, who failed to appear, leading to an ex‑parte decree. The appellant, NAK Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd., later sought to be impleaded, claiming it was the successor of respondent No.3 …

GULFISHA FATIMAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2026 INSC 2Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined bail applications of several accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It balanced the constitutional right to liberty under Article 21 against the statutory bail restriction in Section 43D(5) of the UAPA, considering the …

NIRBHAY SINGH SULIYAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2026 INSC 7Case Allowed

The appellant, an Additional District Judge with 27 years of unblemished service, was removed from service after a departmental inquiry relied solely on four bail orders in which he allegedly failed to refer to Section 59‑A of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Act. A complaint alleged that the judge took …

ADANI POWER LTD. & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2026 INSC 1Appeal(s) allowed

Adani Power Ltd., operating a coal‑based power plant in the Mundra SEZ, challenged the levy of customs duty on electricity exported from its SEZ unit to the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) under several notifications issued between 2010 and 2016. The Gujarat High Court, in a 2015 judgment, held that no …