Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

AGAUTA SUGAR AND CHEMICALSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Citation
1997 INSC 459
Decided
1 May 1997
Disposal
Leave Granted & Disposed off

Holding

The District Collector shall assess the quantum of sugar stock sufficient to meet the growers’ dues, permit its sale, credit the proceeds to a designated account for payment to the growers, and thereafter assess remaining stock for excise duty and wage liabilities, with no coercive action against the factory.

Summary

The appellant, Agauta Sugar and Chemicals, had failed to pay approximately Rs 29 crore owed to cane growers and societies for sugarcane supplied, leading the District Collector to attach the factory’s sugar stock‑in‑hand. The factory filed a writ petition challenging the attachment, and the High Court issued interim directions that could not be complied with, prompting the parties to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Court directed the District Collector of Bulandshahr to determine the quantity of sugar stock required to satisfy the growers’ dues, interest and society commissions, treating this amount as a first charge against the stock. The Collector was ordered to permit the sale of that assessed quantity, ensure the sale proceeds are deposited in a bank account, and use the funds to pay the growers in full. After payment to the growers, the factory may apply for assessment of its liabilities for excise duty and wage arrears, with the Collector authorising the sale of additional stock to meet those obligations. The Court also ordered that no coercive action be taken against the factory or its officers pending implementation of these directions. The appeals were consequently disposed of without costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the District Collector can assess and attach the sugar stock‑in‑hand to satisfy pending dues to cane growers, societies and interest.
  • Whether the sale of the attached stock can be directed with proceeds earmarked for payment to the growers and later for excise duty and wage liabilities.
  • Whether coercive steps against the factory or its officers should be stayed pending compliance with the Court’s directions.

Subjects

sugarcane paymentcane growersattachment of stockdistrict collectorinterim reliefexcise dutywage arrearssale of stockfirst charge

Judgment

                 AGAUTA SUGAR AND CHEMICALS                                    A
                                     v.
                       STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

                               MAY 1, 1997

           [K. RAMASWAMY, S. SAGHIR AHMAD AND                                   B
                    G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.]

      Sugar and Sugarcane :

       Sugar factory withholding payment of cane growers--Collector attached C
sugar stock-in-hand-Sugar factory filed writ petition in High Court and
pending writ petition filed appeal before Supreme Court with regard to interim
directions-Held, District Collector would assess the quantum of sugar stock
in order to meet the price of sugarcane with interest due to cane growers and
commission to the Societies-It would be first charge and recordable against
the stock of sugar-The entire amount received from the sale would be paid D
to cane growers-Thereafter the sugar factory may make an application before
the Collector stating its liability towards excise duty and amars of wages to
employees-District Collector would assess the quantity of sugar to meet the
said requirement and allow the sale by the appellant for the purpose--Pending
implementation of the order, no coercive steps will be taken against the factory E
or any of its shareholders or officers.

     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 3512-
3513 of 1997.

     From the Judgment and Order dated 27.2.97 and 21.3.97 of the               F
Allahabad High Court in C.M.A. No. 1255(W)/97 in W.P. No. 775 (MB)
and C.W.P. No. 775 of 1997.

      Shanti Bhushan, A.B. Rohtagi, D.A. Dave, M.N. Krishnamani,
Jatinder Sethi, Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Prashant Kumar, Pradeep Misra,
Rekha Agarwal and Pravir Choudhary for the appearing parties.                  G
      The following Order of the Court was delivered :

      Leave granted.

      Application for impleadment allowed.                                     H
                                 1169
    1170                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS                      [1997) 3 S.C.R.

A         These appeals by special leave, arise from the judgment and order
    of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, made on February 27,
    1997 and March 2, 1997 in C.M. Application No. 1255(W)/97 in Writ
    Petition No. 775(MB)/97 and Writ Petition No. 775/MB/97.

           It is not necessary to reiterate all the factual details. Suffice it to state
B that the appellant had used the sugarcane supplied by the cane growers
    individually or through the societies. As a consequence, we are informed,
    around Rs. 29 crorcs arc in arrears for payment to the cane-growers. The
    Collector exercising the power of recovery proceedings had attached the
    sugar stock-in- hand; against that, the appellant filed a writ petition.
C   Pending writ petition, the High Court has granted certain directions, which
    ultimately could not be complied with. ~nsequently, the interim directions
    stood vacated. Thus, these appeals by special leave.

          Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, we think that the
    following order would meet the situation:
D
          (1) TJ{e District Collector, Bulandshahar is directed to assess as to
    what is the quantum of the Sugar stock-in-hand would be sufficient to meet
    the payment of price of the sugarcane together with interest to all the cane
    growers towards the sugarcane supplied by them for all the crushing
E   seasons as also the Societies' commission. It would be a first charge and
    recordable against the stock of sugar. On so assessing, he would permit the
    appellant to sell that quantum of stock of sugar. The sale proceeds thereof,
    when received from the appellant, are directed to be credited to an account
    to be opened by the Collector in a nationalised Bank towards this amount.
    The Collector is directed to depute a responsible officer of his collectorate
F   to be present at the time of sale. The officer would ensure that the sale
    would be made only of the permitted stock and that the sale proceeds are
    credited to the said account directed to be opened in that behalf. On the
    amount being so deposited, the entire amount due shall be paid to the cane
    growers.

G          (2) After the sale thus is effected and payment made to the cane
     growers, it would be open to the appellant to file an application before the
     Collector stating as to what amount it is liable to pay towards Excise Duty
     and arrears of wages to the employees etc. On the statement so made, the
     District Collector is directed to assess as to what quantity of su~ar from
H    the remaining stock-in-hand would meet the above requirements; hywould
             AGAUTASUGARANDCHJ;:MICALSv. STATE                           1171

accordingly allow the release of that part of the stock-in- hand for sale by     A
the appellant for liquidation of Excise Duty, arrears of wages etc.

      The above exercise would be done within a period of two months
from the date of receipt of this order. In the event of the appellant
succeeding in the writ petition, appropriate directions may be given by the
High Court in the main writ petition for mutual adjustment of any amount         B
repayable by the cane growers. The order of attachment would stand lifted
after compliance of these direCiibns. If there is any difficulty in the im-
plementation of this order, liberty is given to the appellant to approach this
Court. Pending implementation of this order, we hope and trust that no
further coercive steps will be taken and no officers, who are members of         C
the appellant-company or shareholders of the company, would be detained.

       Appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs.

R.P.                                                    Appeals disposed of.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "sugarcane payment"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.