ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABADversusARVIND POLYCOT LTD.
- Citation
- 2008 INSC 160
- Decided
- 8 February 2008
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- S H KAPADIA
Holding
Interest paid on borrowings for capital assets not put to use in the relevant financial year is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961.
Summary
The Department appealed against the assessment of Arvind Polycot Ltd., contending that interest paid on borrowings for capital assets that were not put to use during the financial year could not be claimed as a deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Court examined the statutory language and prior authority, particularly the decision in Dy. Commnr. of Income Tax, Ahmedabad v. Mis. Core Health Care Ltd. It held that the provision allows deduction of such interest even if the asset is not yet operational, provided the borrowing is for a capital asset. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed. No order as to costs was made.
Issues considered
- Whether interest paid in respect of borrowings on capital assets not put to use in the concerned financial year is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961
Legislation cited
- Income Tax Act, 1961s. 36(1)(iii)
Subjects
Judgment
~/
(2008) 2 S.C.R. 650
~
A ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
_...,, .
AHMEDABAD
'II.
A~VIND POLYCOT LTD.
(Civil Appeal No. 1182 of 2008)
B FEBRUARY 8, 2008
[S.H. KAPADIA AND B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, JJ.] J..
Income Tax Act, 1961 - s.36(i)(iii) - Interest paid in
respect of borrowings on capital assets not put to use in the
c concerned financial year - Held : Is allowable deduction.
The question which arose of consideration in the
present appeal is : Whether interest paid in respect of
borrowings on capital assets not put to use in the
concerned financial year can be permitted as allowable
D
deduction under Section 36(1) (iii) of the Income-Tax Act,
A
1961?
·~
Dismissing the appeal, the Court
·HELD: Interest paid in respect of borrowings on
E
capital assets not put to use in the concerned financial
year is allowable deduction under s.36(1 )(iii) of the
-:
Income-Tax Act, 1961. [Para 2] [651-8, C]
Dy. Commnr. of Income Tax, Ahmedabad v. Mis. Core
F Health Care Ltd. 2008(2) Scale 327 - relied on. )..
CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1182
of 2008.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.10.2005 of the
G High Court of judicature of Gujarat atAhmedabad in Tax Appeal
No. 526 of 2003. ,,.,
P. Vishwanatha Shetty, T. Srinivasa Murthy, Gaurav Agrawal
and B.V. Balaram Das for the Appellant.
H 650
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 651,
AHMEDABAD v. ARVIND POLYCOT LTD. [KAPADIA, J.]
S. Ganesh, Amar Dave, Rustom B. Hathikhanawala, E.C. A
Agrawala. J.P. Shah, Manish Shah, Harish J. Jhaveri, Pardiwala,
Jay Savla and Reena Bagga for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
KAPADIA, J. 1. Leave granted. B
2. In this civil appeal filed by the Department the question
of law arises for determination which question is as follows:
"Whether interest paid in respect of borrowings on capital
assets not put to use in the concerned financial year can 1 c
be permitted as allowable deduction under Section
36(1 )(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?"
3. Our answer to the above-mentioned question is squarely '
covered by our decision in favour of the assessee and against
the Department in the case of Dy. Commr. of Income Tax, D
Ahmedabad v. Mis. Core Health Care Ltd. in Civil Appeal ,
Nos.3952-55 of 2002.
... 4. Accordingly the said question is answered in favour of
assessee and against the Department. Consequently the •
Department's civil appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. E
D.G. Appeal dismissed. 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.