Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Citation
2005 INSC 402
Decided
6 September 2005
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as it lacks merit and does not warrant interference with the High Court's dismissal of the review petition.

Summary

Bagirath Singh and another appealed to the Supreme Court against the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order dismissing their review petition. The review petition sought a re‑examination of the High Court's judgment in Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of 1998. The Supreme Court examined whether the appeal raised any substantive merit or legal error in the dismissal. Finding that the appeal did not disclose any viable ground for interference, the Court held that there was no reason to entertain it. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the High Court's dismissal of the review petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Supreme Court should entertain an appeal against the High Court's order dismissing a review petition in a civil writ case

Subjects

civil appealreview petitiondismissalmaintainabilitySupreme Court

Judgment

                           BAGIRATH SINGH AND ANR.                                   A
                                          v.
                         STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

                                SEPTEMBER 6, 2005
                                                                                     B
                       [B.P. SINGH AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.J

            Practice and Procedure-Appeal filed against the order of dismissal of
.•
     writ petition-Dismissed by Supreme Court-There is no merit in the present
     appeal against dismissal of the Review Petition by the High Court-Hence
     dismissed.                                                                      c
            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 647 of 2000.

          From the Judgment and Order dated 7.5. 1999 of the Punjab and Haryana
     High Court in Review Application No. 357/99 in C.W.P. No. 183 JO of 1998.       D

          P.C. Jain and Mahendra Anand, Ms. S. Janani and Keertee Sinha with
     them for the Appellants.

          S.P. Goyal, Arnita Gupta, Prashant Rana and Himanshu Upadhyaya for
     the Respondents.                                                                E
            The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

           B.P. SINGH, J. : This Civil Appeal has been preferred by the appellants
     against the order of the High Court dismissing the review petition filed by     F
•    them for review of the judgment and order of the High Court in Civil Writ
     Petition No. 18310 of 1998.

         We have today dismissed Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000 arising out of
     CWP No. 18310 of 1998. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal and the
     same is accordingly dismissed.                                                  G

     R.P.                                                      Appeal dismissed.




                                          1179


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "civil appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.