Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

STATE PROJECT DIRECTORversusSURESHBHAI DAHYABHAI MACHHI

Disposal
33-CA DISPOSED OF

Holding

The Court reopened the respondent's right to file the reply, subject to a deposit of Rs.2,000.

Summary

The State Project Director filed a civil application for recall of a special civil matter (No. 13467/2024) against Sureshbhai Dahyabhai Machhi and another. The respondent No.2 had prepared a reply but failed to file it within the time prescribed by the High Court order dated 10‑02‑2026. The Court noted the lapse and, after hearing counsel, decided to reopen the respondent's right to file the reply. The reopening was conditioned on the respondent depositing Rs.2,000 in the Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Law Library by 17‑04‑2026. Upon compliance, the reply will be taken on record and substituted in the main matter, and the recall application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may reopen the respondent's right to file a reply after the deadline has passed

Subjects

recallcivil proceduredeadlinereply filingdeposit conditionHigh Court order

Judgment

          C/CA/1523/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RECALL) NO. 1523 of 2026

                      In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/13467/2024
  ================================================================
                             STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR
                                      Versus
                        SURESHBHAI DAHYABHAI MACHHI & ANR.
  ================================================================
  Appearance:
  MR AD OZA(515) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MS NIDHI VYAS, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
  Respondent(s) No. 2
  MR HJ DHOLAKIA(5862) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
  ================================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                                            Date : 09/04/2026

                                              ORAL ORDER
  1.       Having heard learned counsels for the respective
  parties, it appears that the respondent has already
  prepared the reply and submitted in the Registry of this
  Court but same was not                              led in time as per the order
  dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Court.


  2.      Thus, considering the aforesaid facts and in view of
  the said order, right to                        le reply by the respondent No.2
  is hereby reopened subject to the respondent No.2
  deposit          of      Rs.      2,000/-          in     the       Gujarat          High         Court
  Advocates’ Law Library on or before 17.04.2026.

  3.   Upon the compliance of this Court, the Registry shall
  take the reply on the record and replace it in the main
  matter.

  4.       Accordingly, this Civil application is disposed of.


                                                                              (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J)
  SYED SHAHANAZ
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SYED SHAHANAZ(HC02353), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/04/2026 13:43:26
                                                  Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "recall"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.