High Court of Gujarat
THE METHODIST CHURCH , INDIAversusSOMABHAI R. PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
- Disposal
- 53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Holding
The Court allowed the condonation of delay, holding that the explanation for the 83‑day delay was satisfactory under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Summary
The Methodist Church, India filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of an 83‑day delay in filing its appeal. The respondent state, represented by an AGP, waived service of notice. Counsel for the applicant explained the reasons for the delay, which the Court found satisfactory. Consequently, the Court allowed the application and made the rule absolute, thereby permitting the appeal to proceed despite the delay.
Issues considered
- Whether the 83‑day delay in filing the appeal can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
Legislation cited
Subjects
condonation of delayLimitation Actcivil procedureappealSection 5
Judgment
C/CA/3194/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3194 of
2026
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL/12417/2026
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/4415/2008
==========================================================
THE METHODIST CHURCH , INDIA
Versus
SOMABHAI R. PATEL SINCE DECEASED THROUGH ITS LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVES & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIVEK V BHAMARE(6710) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
ANTRIX KAPADIYA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,5
MR MJ MEHTA(5797) for the Respondent(s) No. 1.1,1.2,1.3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA
Date : 24/07/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)
1. Rule. Learned AGP waives service of notice of rule on
behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed by the applicant under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act for Condonation of Delay of 83
days.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant.
4. Considering the averments made in the application and
Page 1 of 2
C/CA/3194/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/07/2026
upon submission of learned counsel appearing for the
applicant, delay of 83 days in filing the appeal has been
explained to the satisfaction of the Court.
5. Accordingly, the present application is allowed in the
above terms. Rule is made absolute.
(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA,J)
(J. L. ODEDRA, J)
YASH ARORA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: YASH ARORA(HC02369), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/07/2026 17:56:05
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search