COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusM/S. LUCAS T.V.S. LTD. PADI CHENNAI
- Citation
- 2007 INSC 1321
- Decided
- 14 December 2007
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT
Holding
Section 43A(1) relates to foreign‑exchange fluctuations and does not determine the allowability of investment allowance under Section 32A in multiple assessment years, so the question must be reconsidered by the High Court.
Summary
The Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against the High Court’s order upholding the Tribunal’s view that investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act could be claimed in more than one assessment year, based on Section 43A(1). The assessing officer argued that the allowance should be allowed only in the year of acquisition. The Supreme Court examined whether Section 43A(1), which deals with foreign‑exchange fluctuations affecting asset valuation, is relevant to the timing of the investment allowance. It held that the Revenue’s contention was correct and that Section 43A(1) does not govern the allowability of the allowance in multiple years. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court’s decision and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after formulating the precise question of law. The appeals were allowed and the case was sent back to the High Court.
Issues considered
- Whether Section 43A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with foreign‑exchange fluctuations, is applicable to the question of allowing investment allowance under Section 32A in more than one assessment year.
Legislation cited
- Income Tax Act, 1961s. 32A, s. 43A(1)
Subjects
Judgment
A COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS
v.
MIS. LUCAS T.V.S. LTD. PADI CHENNAI
DECEMBER 14, 2007
B [DR. ARIJIT P ASAY AT AND P. SATHASIVAM, JJ.]
Income Tax Act, 1961; Ss. 32A and 43A(l):
Investment allowance-Allowing of in one or more than one
C financial years-Held: S.43A(J) relates to fluctuation offoreign
exchange and has nothing to do with allowability of investment in
terms of s. 32(A) of the Act in one or more assessment years-High
Court did not take into consideration the related provisions of law in
its proper perspective while dismissing the appeal of the Revenue-
D Hence, matter remitted to High Court for adjudication afresh after
formulating the question of law involved.
The main issue arose for consideration in these appeals was
as to whether investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income
E Tax Act, 1961 could be allowed in one financial/assessment year only
or in more than one financial years. The assessing officer was of the
view that it is only to be allowed in one assessment year and not
several assessment years. The Tribunal has proceeded on the basis
that in view of Section 43A(l) of the Act the allowance could be
F granted in different assessment years. The order of the Tribunal was
affirmed by the High Court relying on the decision of the High Court
in the case of Southern Asbestos Cement Ltd. v. Commissioner of
Income Tax (259 I.T.R.631). Hence the present appeals.
Appellant contended that Section 43A(l) of the Income Tax Act
G relates to fluctuations of foreign exchange and its effect on the
valuation of the assets. It has nothing to do with the question as to
whether it is allowable in one year. Therefore, the decision relied
upon by the High Court has no application.
958
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. MIS. 959
LUCAS T.V.S.LTD. PADICHENNAI [PASAYAT,J.]
Allowing the appeals, the Court A
HELD: Since contention of the appellant-Revenue that
S.43A(l) of the Income Tax Act relates to fluctuation of foreign
exchange and its effect on the valuation of the assets and it has
nothing to do with the question as to whether it is allowable in one
assessment year or more, accepted by respondent-assessee, the B
matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh adjudication after
formulating the question oflaw involved. [Para 5) [971-E-G]
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal Nos. 5950-
5952 of2007. c
From the final Judgment and Order dated 15.3.2004 of the High
Court of Judicature at Madras in ITA Nos. 109-111 of2004.
P.P. Malhotra, ASG., Dr. R.G. Padia, Arijit Prasad, Shweta and B.V.
Balaram for the Appellant. D
Radha Rangaswamy for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. l. Leave granted.
E
2. Challenge in these appeals is to the order passed by a Division
Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the Tax Case Appeals as
according to the High Court the case at hand is covered against the
- revenue in view of the order passed earlier by the High Court in Southern
Asbestos Cement Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (259 l.T.R. F
631).
3. These appeals relate to assessment years 1989-90, 1991-92 and
1992-93. The core issue is the allowability of investment allowance under
Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the 'Act'). The
assessing officer was of the view that it is only to be allowed in one G
assessment year and not several assessment years. The Tribunal and the
High Court appear to have proceeded on the basis that in view of Section
43A(l) of the Act the allowance was to be granted in different assessment
years.
H
960 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addi.) S.C.R.
A 4. Sections 32A and 43A(l) of the Act read as under:
Sectfon 32A- INVESTMENT ALLOWANCE.
·-
(1) In respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or plant
specified in sub-section (2), which is owned by the assessee
B and is wholly used for the purposes of the business carried
on by him, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the
provisions of this section, be allowed a deduction, in respect
of the previous year in which the ship or aircraft was acquired
or the machinery or plant was installed or, if the ship, aircraft,
c machinery or plant is first put to use in the immediately
succeeding previous year, then, in respect of that previous year,
of a sum by way of investment allowance equal to twenty-five
per cent. of the actual cost of the ship, aircraft, machinery or
plant to the assessee:
D Provided that in respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or
plant specified in sub-section (8B), this sub-section shall have effect
as if for the words "twenty-five per cent", the words "twenty per
cent" had been substituted :
E Provided further that no deduction shall be allowed under this
section in respect of -
(a) Any machinery or plant installed in any office premises or
any residential accommodation, including any accommodation
in the nature of a guest-house;
F
(b) Any office appliances or road transport vehicles;
(c) Any ship, machinery or plant in respect of which the
deduction by way of development rebate is allowable under
section 33; and
G (d) Any machinery or plant, the whole of the actual cost of
which is allowed as a deduction (whether by way of
depreciation or otherwise) in computing the income chargeable
under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession"
of any one previous year.
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. MIS. 961
LUCAS T.V.S.LTD.PADI CHENNAI [PASAYAT,J.]
Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-section, "actual cost" A
means the actual cost of the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant to
the assessee as reduced by that part of such cost which has been
met out of the amount released to the assessee under sub-section
(6) of section 32AB.
(2) The ship or aircraft or machinery or plant referred to in sub- B
section (1) shall be the following, namely :-
(a) A new ship or new aircraft acquired after the 31st day of
March, 1976, by an assessee engaged in the business of operation
of ships or aircraft;
c
(b) Any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st day of
March, 1976 -
...
(i) For the purposes of business of generation or distribution
of electricity or any other form of power; or
D
(ii) 454 in a small-scale industrial undertaking for the purposes
of business of manufacture or production of any article or thing;
or
(iii) In any other industrial undertaking for the purposes of
business of construction, manufacture or production of any E
article or thing, not being an article or thing specified in the list
in the Eleventh Schedule :
'• Provided that nothing contained in clauses (a) and (b) shall apply
in relation to, - F
(i) A new ship or new aircraft acquired, or
(ii) Any new machinery or plant installed, after the 31st day
of March, 1987 but before the 1st day of April, 1988, unless
such ship or aircraft is acquired or such machinery or plant is
G
installed in the circumstances specified in clause (a) of sub-
section (8B) and the assessee furnishes evidence to the
satisfaction of the Assessing Officer as specified in that clause;
(c) Any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st day of
March, 1983, but before the 1st day of April, 1987, for the H
962 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addi.) S.C.R.
A purposes of business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other
powered craft if the business is carried on by an Indian company
and the business so carried on is for the time being approved for
the purposes of this clause by the Central Government.
Explanation : For the purposes of this sub-section and sub-
B sections (2B), (2C) and (4), - (1 )(a) "new ship" or "new aircraft"
includes a ship or aircraft which before the date of acquisition by
the assessee was used by any other person, if it was not at any
time previous to the date of such acquisition owned by any person
resident in India;
c
(b) "New machinery or plant" includes machinery or plant which
before its installation by the assessee was used outside India by
any other person, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :-
-
D (i) Such machinery or plant was not, at any time previous to the
date of such installation by the assessee, used in India;
(ii) Such machinery or plant is imported into India from any country
outside India; and
E (iii) No deduction on account of depreciation in respect of such
machinery or plant has been allowed or is allowable under the
provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922), or
this Act in computing the total income of any person for any period
prior to the date of the installation of the machinery or plant by
F the assessee,
(2) An industrial undertaking shall be deemed to be a small-scale
industrial undertaking, if the aggregate value of the machinery and
plant (other than tools, jigs, dies and moulds) installed, as on the
last day of the previous year, for the purposes of the business of
G
the undertaking does not exceed, -
(i) In a case where the previous year ends before the 1st day of
August, 1980, ten lak.h rupees;
(ii) In a case where the previous year ends after the 31st day of
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. M/S. 963
LUCAST.V.S.LTD.PADICHENNAl[PASAYAT,J.]
July, 1980, but before the 18th day of March, 1985, twenty lakh A
rupees; and
(iii) In a case where the previous year ends after the 17th day of
March, 1985, thirty-five lakh rupees, and for this purpose the
value of any machinery or plant shall be, -
B
(a) In the case of any machinery or plant owned by the assessee,
the actual cost thereof to the assessee; and
(b) In the case of any machinery or plant hired by the assessee,
the actual cost thereof as in the case of the owner of such machinery
m~ C
(2A) The deduction wider sub-section (1) shall not be denied in
respect of any machinery or plant installed and used mainly for the
purposes of business of construction, manufacture or production
of any article or thing, not being an article or thing specified in the D
list in the Eleventh Schedule, by reason only that such machinery
or plant is also used for the purposes of business of construction,
manufacture or production of any article or thing specified in the
said list.
(2B) Where any new machinery or plant is installed after the 30th E
day of June, 1977 but before the 1st day of April, 1987, for the
purposes of business of manufacture or production of any article
or thing and such article or thing -
(a) Is manufactured or produced by using any technology (including F
any process) or other know-how developed in, or
(b) Is an article or thing invented in, a laboratory owned or
financed by the Government, or a laboratory owned by a public
sector company or a University or by an institution recognised in
this behalf by the prescribed authority 463 , the provisions of sub- G
section (1) shall have effect in relation to such machinery or plant
as if for the words "twenty-five per cent.", the words "thirty-five
per cent" had been substituted, ifthe following conditions are fulfilled,
namely:-
H
964 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addi.) S.C.R.
A (i) The right to use such technology (including any process) or other
know-how or to manufacture or produce such article or thing has
been acquired from the owner of such laboratory or any person
deriving title from such owner;
(ii) The assessee furnishes, along with the return of income for the
B assessment year for which the deduction is claimed, a certificate
from the prescribed authority to the effect that such article or thing
is manufactured or produced by using such technology (including
any process) or other know-how developed in such laboratory or
is an artick or thing invented in such laboratory; and
c
(iii) The machinery or plant is not used for the purpose of business
of manufacture or production of any article or thing specified in
the list in the Eleventh Schedule.
Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-section, -
D
(a) "Laboratory financed by the Government" means a laboratory
owned by any body [including a society registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860)] and financed
wholly or mainly by the Government;
E xx xx xx
(c) "University" means a University established or incorporated by
or under a Central, State or Provincial Act and includes an
institution declared under section 3 of the University Grants
Commission Act, 1956 (3 of 1956), to be a University for the
F
purposes of that Act.
(2C) Where any new machinery or plant, being machinery or plant
which would assist in control of pollution or protection of
environment and which has been notified 466 in this behalf by the
G Central Government in the Official Gazette, is installed after the
31st day of May, 1983 but before the 1st day of April, 1987, in
any industrial undertaking referred to in sub-clause (i) or sub-clause
(ii) or sub-clause (iii) of clause (b) of sub-section (2), the provisions
of sub-section (1) shall have effect in relation to such machinery
H or plant as if for the words "twenty-five per cent", the words
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. MIS. 965
LUCAST.V.S.LTD.PADICHENNAI[PASAYAT,J.]
"thirty-five per cent" had been substituted. A
(3) Where the total income of the assessee assessable for the
assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the ship or
aircraft was acquired or the machinery or plant was installed, or,
as the case may be, the immediately succeeding previous year [the
total income for this purpose being computed after deduction of B
the allowance under section 33 and section 33A, but without
making any deduction under sub-section (1) of this section or any
deduction under Chapter VI-A is nil or is less than the full amount
of the investment allowance, -
c
(i) The sum to be allowed by way of investment allowance for that
assessment year under sub-section (1) shall be only such amount
as is sufficient to reduce the said total income to nil; and
(ii) The amount of the investment allowance, to the extent to \\>illch
it has not been allowed as aforesaid, shall be carried forward to D
the following assessment year, and the investment allowance to be
allowed for the following assessment year shall be such amount as
is sufficient to reduce the total income of the assessee assessable
for that assessment year, computed in the manner aforesaid, to nil,
and the balance of the investment allowance, if any, still outstanding E
shall be carried forward to the following assessment year and so
on, so, however, that no portion of the investment allowance shall
be carried forward for more than eight assessment years
immediately succeeding the assessment year relevant to the
previous year in which the ship or aircraft was acquired or the F
machinery or plant was installed or, as the case may be, the
immediately succeeding previous year.
Explanation : Where for any assessment year, investment
allowance is to be allowed in accordance with the provisions of G
this sub-section in respect of any ship or aircraft acquired or any
machinery or plant installed in more than one previous year, and
the total income of the assessee assessable for that assessment year
[the total income (or this purpose being computed after deduction
of the allowance under section 33 and section 33A, but without
H
966 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addl.) S.C.R.
A making any deduction under sub-section (1) of this section or any
deduction under Chapter VI-A] is less than the aggregate of the
amounts due to be allowed in respect of the asset aforesaid for
that assessment year, the following procedure shall be followed,
namely:-
B (a) The allowance under clause (ii) shall be made before any
allowance under clause (i) is made; and
(b) where an allowance has to be made under clause (ii) in
respect of amounts carried forward from more than one assessment
c year, 1he amount carried forward from an earlier assessment year
shall be allowed before any amount carried forward from a later
assessment year.
(4) The d~duction under sub-section (1) shall be allowed only if
the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :-
D
(i) Tbe particulars prescribed 468 in this behalf have been
furnished by the assessee in respect of the ship or aircraft or
machinery or plant;
(ii) A'.1. amount equal to seventy-five per cent of the investment
E allowance to be actually allowed is debited to the profit and loss
account of any previous year in respect of which the deduction is
to be allowed under sub-section (3) or any earlier previous year
[being a previous year not earlier than the year in which the ship
or aircraft was acquired or the machinery or plant was installed or
F the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant was first put to use] and
credited to a reserve account (to be called the "Investment
Allowar1ce Reserve Account") to be utilised -
(a) For the purposes of acquiring, before the expiry of a period
G of ten years next following the previous year in which the ship or
aircraft was acquired or the machinery or plant was installed, a
new ship or a new aircraft or new machinery or plant [other than
machinery or plant of the nature referred to in clauses (a), (b) and
(d) of the second proviso to sub-section (1)) for the purposes of
the business of the undertaking; and
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. M/S. 967
LUCAS T.V.S. LTD. PADI CHENNAI [PASAYAT,J.]
(b) Until the acquisition of a new ship or a new aircraft or new A
machinery or plant as aforesaid, for the purposes of the business
of the undertaking other than for distribution by way of dividends
or profits or for remittance outside India as profits or for the
creation of any asset outside India :
Provided that this clause shall have effect in respect of a ship B
as if for the word "seventy-five", the word "fifty" had been
substituted.
Explanation : Where the amount debited to the profit and loss
account and credited to the Investment Allowance Reserve C
Account under this sub-section is not less than the amount required
to be so credited on the basis of the amount of deduction in respect
of investment allowance claimed in the return made by the assessee
under section 139, but a higher deduction in respect of the
investment allowance is admissible on the basis of the total income
D
as proposed to be computed by the Assessing Officer under
section 143, the Assessing Officer shall, by notice in writing in this
behalf, allow the assessee an opportunity to credit within the time
specified in the notice or within such further time as the Assessing
Officer may allow, a further amount to the Investment Allowance
Reserve Account out of the profits and gains of the previous year E
in which such notice is served on the assessee or of the immediately
preceding previous year, if the accounts for that year have not been
made up; and, if the assessee credits any further amount to such
account within the time aforesaid, the amount so credited shall be
deemed to have been credited to the Investment Allowance F
Reserve Account of the previous year in which the deduction is
admissible and such amount shall not be taken into account in
determining the adequacy of the reserve required to be credited
by the assessee in respect of the previous year in which such further
~~~~: G
Provided that such opportunity shall not be allowed by the
Assessing Officer in a case where the difference in the total income
as proposed to be computed by him and the total income as
returned by the assessee arises out of the application of the proviso H
968 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addi.) S.C.R.
A to sub-section (1) of section 145 or sub-section (2) ofthnt section
or the omission by the assessee to disclose his income :Ully and
truly.
(5) Any allowance made under this section in respect of any ship,
aircraft, machinery or plant shall be deemed to have been wrongly
B made for the purposes of this Act -
(a) If the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant is sold or otherwise
transferred by th~ assessee to any person at any time before the
expiry of eight years from the end of the previous year in which it
c was acquired or mstalled; or
(b) If at any time before the expiry of ten years from the end of
the previous year in which the ship or aircraft was acquired or the
machinery or pl<mt was installed, the assessee does not utilise the
amount credited to the reserve account under sub-section (4) for
D the purposes of acquiring a new ship or a new aircraft or new
machinery or plant [other than machinery or plant of' the nature
referred to in clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the second prm'iso to sub-
section (1)] for the purposes of the busint'.ss of the undertaking;
or
E
(c) If at any time before the expiry of the ten years aforesaid, the
assessee utilises the amount credited to the reserve acc:ount under
sub-section (4) for distribution by way of dividends or profits or
for remittance outside India as profits or for the creation of any
F
asset outside India or for any other purpose which is not a purpose
of the business of the undertaking, and the provisions of sub-
section (4A) of section 155 shall apply accordingly :
Provided that nothing in clause (a) shall apply- (\)Where the
ship, aircraft, machinery or plant is sold or otherwise transferred
G by the assessee to the Government, a local authority, a corporation
established by a Central, State or Provincial Act or a Government
company as defined in section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956
or (1 of 1956); or
(ii) Where the sale or transfer of the ship, aircraft, machinery or
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. MIS. 969
LUCAS T.V.S. LTD.PADI CHENNAI [PASAYAT,J.]
plant is made in connection with the amalgamation or succession, A
referred to in sub-section (6) or sub-section (7).
(6) Where, in a scheme of amalgamation, the amalgamating
company sells or otherwise transfers to the amalgamated company
any ship, aircraft, machinery or plant, in respect of which investment
allowance has been allowed to the amalgamating company under B
sub-section (1), - (a) The amalgamated company shall continue
to fulfil the conditions mentioned in sub-section (4) in respect of
the reserve created by the amalgamating company and in respect
of the period within which such ship, aircraft, machinery or plant
shall not be sold or otherwise transferred and in default of any of C
these conditions, the provisions of sub-section (4A) of section 155
shall apply to the amalgamated company as they would have
applied to the amalgamating company had it committed the default;
and
D
(b) TI1e balance of investment allowance, if any, still outstanding
to the amalgamating company in respect of such ship, aircraft,
machinery or plant, shall be allowed to the amalgamated company
in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3), so, however,
that the to\al period for which the balance of investment allowance E
shall be carried forward in the assessments of the amalgamating
company and the amalgamated company shall not exceed the
period of eight years specified in sub-section (3) and the
amalgamated company shall be treated as the assessee in respect
of such ship, aircraft, machinery or plant, for the purposes of this F
section.
(7) Where a firm is succeeded to by a company in the business
carried on by it as a result of which the firm sells or otherwise
transfers to the company any ship, aircraft, machinery or plant, the
provisions of clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (6) shall, so far as G
may be, apply to the firm and the company.
Explanation: The provisions of this sub-section shall apply only
where - (i) All the property of the firm relating to the business
immediately before the succession becomes the property of the
H
970 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007] 13 (Addi.) S.C.R.
A company;
(ii) All 1he Ii abilities of 1he finn relating to 1he business immediately
before 1he succession become the liabilities of the company; and
(iii) All 1he shareholders of the company were partners of1he firm
B immedi.ately before 1he succession.
(8) The Central Government, if it considers necessary or expedient
so to do, may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that
1he deduction allowable under this section shall not be allowed in
respect of any ship or aircraft acquired or any machinery or plant
c installed after such date as may be specified 4751herein.
(8A) The Central Government, if it considers necessary or
expedient so to do, may, by notification in 1he Official Gazette, omit
any article or thing from 1he list of articles or things specified in 1he
D Eleven1h Schedule.
(8B) Notwi1hstanding anything contained in sub-section (8) or 1he
notification of1he Government oflndia in 1he Ministry ofFinance
(Department of Revenue) No. G.S.R. 870(E), dated 1he 12th June,
1986, issued thereunder, the provisions of 1his section shall apply
E in respect of, - (a)(i) A new ship or new aircraft acquired after
1he 31st day of March, 1987 but before 1he !st day of April, 1988,
if the assessee furnishes evidence to the satisfaction of the
Assessing Officer 1hat he had, before the 121h day of June, 1986,
entered into a contract for the purchase of such ship or aircraft
F wi1h 1he builder or manufacturer or owner thereof, as 1he case may
be;
(ii) Any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st day of
March, 1987 but before 1he Ist day of April, 1988, if 1he assessee
G furnishes evidence to 1he satisfaction of 1he Assessing Officer 1hat
before the 12th day of June, 1986, he had purchased such
machinery or plant or had entered into a contract for 1he purchase
of such machinery or plant with 1he manufacturer or owner of, or
a dealer in, such machinery or plant, or had, where such machinery
or plant has been manufactured in an undertaking owned by the
H
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS v. M/S. 971
LUCAST.V.S.LTD.PADICHENNAI[PASAYAT,J.]
assessee, taken steps for the manufacture of such machinery or A
plant:
Provided that nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall entitle
the assessee to claim deduction in respect of a ship or aircraft or
machinery or plant referred to in this clause in any previous year
except the previous year relevant to the assessment year B
commencing on the 1st day of April, 1989;
(b) A new ship or new aircraft acquired or any new machinery or
plant installed after the 31st day of March, 1988, but before such
date as the Central Government, if it considers necessary or c
expedient so to do, may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
specify 477a in this behalf.
(8C) Subject to the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section (3),
where a deduction has been allowed to an assessee under sub-
section (1) in any assessment year, no deduction shall be allowed D
to the assessee under section 32AB in the said assessment year
(hereinafter referred to as the initial assessment year) and a block
of further period of four years beginning with the assessment year
immediately succeeding the initial assessment year.
E
5. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that Section 43A(1)
relates to fluctuations of foreign exchange and its effect on the valuation
of the assets. It has nothing to do with the question as to whether it is
allowable in one year. Therefore, the decision relied upon by the High
Court has no application. F
6. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly accepted this position.
7. In that view of the matter, we set aside the impugned order of
the High Court, remit the matter to it for fresh adjudication after formulating
the question oflaw involved. G
8. The appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent. No costs.
S.K.S. Appeals allowed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.