BHAVAN GANDHI @BHAVAN PATEL @ BHAVESH GANDHI @ BHAVESH PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- HASMUKH D SUTHAR
Holding
The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner Bhavan Gandhi was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No.11993004230013 alleging violations of Sections 65(a)(e), 98(2), 81 and 116‑B of the Prohibition Act. After the investigation concluded, a charge‑sheet was filed and the petitioner applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence. The State opposed bail, arguing the petitioner’s involvement in the offence. The Court examined the statutory factors for bail, the petitioner’s ten prior acquitted antecedents, the lack of any material to be recovered, and precedents such as Sanjay Chandra v. CBI and Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor, emphasizing the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception under Article 21. Finding no substantial risk of tampering, absconding, or threat to public interest, the Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with several conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail can be granted under Section 483 of the BNSS after a charge‑sheet has been filed.
- Whether the nature of the alleged offences under the Prohibition Act and the petitioner’s antecedents preclude bail.
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.MA/13354/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
CHARGESHEET) NO. 13354 of 2026
==========================================================
BHAVAN GANDHI @BHAVAN PATEL S/O MURJI @MULJI @ MURABHAI
@ BABU LIRABHAI GANDHI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DARSHAN P DAVE(5928) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ADITYA JADEJA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 09/07/2026
ORDER
[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No.11993004230013 of 2023 registered
with Bhachau Police Station, Kachchh East Gandhidham, for the offence
under Sections 65 (a)(e), 98(2), 81 and 116-B of the Prohibition Act.
[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence.
Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed. He therefore submits that,
considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on
regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant is
involved in the offene. Hence, the present application does not deserve any
consideration.
Page 1 of 4
R/CR.MA/13354/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.
[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:
(1) Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed;
(2) Applicant is behind the bar since 19.02.2026;
(3) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;
(4) conclusion and commencement of trial will take its own time;
(5) applicant is having 10 past antecedents, in all he is acquitted;
[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/13354/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.
[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.
No.11993004230013 of 2023 registered with Bhachau Police Station,
Kachchh East Gandhidham, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to
the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall
not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be
collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
(d) not leave territory of State of Gujarat without prior permission of
the concerned learned Sessions Judge;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in every
month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00
p.m.;
(f) furnish the Aadhar card, email ID/present address of his
residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at
the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the
residence/contact number without prior permission of Trial
Court;
(g) not enter Kachchh District for six months except for marking
presence and /or attending the court proceedings;
[9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
Page 3 of 4
R/CR.MA/13354/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026
connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the
above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
[10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction
to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.
[11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations
of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
while enlarging the applicant on bail.
[12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
KUMAR ALOK
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ALOK KUMAR(HC01091), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 18:23:40
Page 4 of 4
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.