High Court of Gujarat
RAMESHBHAI KHODABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- HEMANT M PRACHCHHAK
Holding
The application is allowed and the 114‑day delay is condoned.
Summary
Rameshbhai Khodabhai Patel filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking restoration, but delayed filing it by 114 days. The State of Gujarat, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed condonation of this delay. The court examined the explanation provided by the applicant and determined that sufficient cause existed for the delay. Consequently, the court allowed the application and condoned the 114‑day delay. The order was pronounced by Justice Hemant M. Prachchak on 18 June 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 114 days in filing a criminal miscellaneous application for restoration can be condoned
- Whether the explanation offered by the applicant constitutes sufficient cause for condonation
Subjects
condonation of delaycriminal miscellaneous applicationrestorationsufficient causeprocedure
Judgment
R/CR.MA/13540/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/06/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY) NO. 13540 of 2026
In
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/13869/2026
In
F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/43139/2025
In
F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/28088/2025
==========================================
RAMESHBHAI KHODABHAI PATEL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================
Appearance:
MR MANAN B PANDYA(12491) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 18/06/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. The application is filed to condone the delay of 114 days
occurred in filing the criminal misc. application for restoration.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent – State
of Gujarat has opposed the present application.
3. Considered the explanation given in the application, this Court
finds that the sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay.
4. In view of the above, the application is allowed. The delay is
condoned.
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
V.R. PANCHAL
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/06/2026 16:36:26
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search