IBRAHIM MAMAD MAMANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- HASMUKH D SUTHAR
Holding
The court held that, on the facts, the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS 2023 as the case merits the exercise of judicial discretion and parity with the co‑accused requires bail.
Summary
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for offences alleged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed bail citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court examined factors such as the nature of the accusation, risk of witness tampering, the applicant’s lack of prior record, and the fact that a similarly situated co‑accused had already been released. Relying on precedent (Ramesh Batukbhai Dabhi, Sanjay Chandra, Gudikanti Narasimhulu) and the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, the Court found the case fit for discretion. Consequently, the Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with a surety and imposed standard conditions, directing the applicant to comply with reporting and non‑interference requirements.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 BNSS 2023 despite the gravity of the offences alleged under the BNS 2023.
- Whether parity with a similarly situated co‑accused who was released mandates granting bail to the applicant.
- Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to prevent tampering with evidence or witnesses.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023s. 109(1), s. 115(2), s. 118(1), s. 125(a), s. 125(b), s. 189(2), s. 190, s. 191(2), s. 191(3), s. 296(b), s. 351(3)
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.MA/15869/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
CHARGESHEET) NO. 15869 of 2026
==========================================================
IBRAHIM MAMAD MAMAN
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DARSHAN M VARANDANI(7357) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 13/07/2026
ORDER
[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No.11205039260357 of 2026 registered with
Madhapar Police Station, Kachchh West-Bhuj for the offences punishable
under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 125(a), 125(b), 189(2), 190, 191(2),
191(3), 351(3) and 296(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short
“BNS”).
[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now
nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits
that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged
on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present
application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.
Page 1 of 4
R/CR.MA/15869/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2026
[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.
[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:
(1) The allegation is that applicant was member of mob and he also
pelted stone however, now substantial part of investigation is over;
(2) Applicant is behind the bars since 30.05.2026;
(3) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;
(4) The applicant is not having any past antecedent;
(5) Similarly situated co-accused is released by this Court and hence,
applicant is entitled to get the benefit of parity in view of
decision in the case of Ramesh Batukbhai Dabhi vs. State of
Gujarat reported in 2011 (3) GLR 1150;
(6) Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take some
time.
Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/15869/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2026
[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.
[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.
No.11205039260357 of 2026 registered with Madhapar Police Station,
Kachchh West-Bhuj on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty-five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall
not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be
collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the
Trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a
month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00
p.m.;
Page 3 of 4
R/CR.MA/15869/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/07/2026
(f) furnish the UIDAI Number, Contact Number/s, Passport Number
(if he is having the passport), E-mail address and present address
of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court
at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the
residence without prior permission of Trial Court;
(h) not to indulge in any illegal activity or any similar type of offence
failing which concerned Investigating Officer shall have liberty to
file an application for cancellation of bail against the present
applicant.
[9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the
above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
[10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete,
modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.
[11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by
this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
[12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)
Ajay
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/07/2026 14:58:11
Page 4 of 4
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.