High Court of Gujarat
PRADIPKUMAR DINESHBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- HASMUKH D SUTHAR
Holding
The court held that, given the completed investigation, lack of prior antecedents, and parity with co‑accused, the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
Summary
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the applicant's involvement and the gravity of the offences. The court examined standard bail factors, noting that the investigation was substantially complete, no further recovery was expected from the applicant, he had no prior antecedents, and co‑accused in similar roles had been granted bail. Relying on precedent such as Sanjay Chandra v. CBI and the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception, the court found the applicant eligible for bail. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on regular bail subject to a personal bond and several conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in light of the nature of the alleged offences.
- Whether the risk of witness tampering, absconding, or prejudice to the investigation warrants denial of bail.
- Whether parity with co‑accused who were granted bail influences the decision.
Legislation cited
Subjects
regular bailSection 483 BNSSProhibition ActBharatiya Nyaya Sanhitapre‑trial detentionpersonal libertyArticle 21parity with co‑accusedinvestigation
Judgment
R/CR.MA/16153/2026 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
CHARGESHEET) NO. 16153 of 2026
==============================================
PRADIPKUMAR DINESHBHAI PARMAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==============================================
Appearance:
MR KEVAL G BRAHMBHATT (BAROT)(9900) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. KARTIK C. PATEL(18437) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 15/07/2026
ORDER
(1) RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
(2) The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail
in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11204021260281 of 2026
registered with Dakor Police Station, District - Kheda, for the
offence under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 81, 83 and 98(2) of
the Prohibition Act and under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3) and
111(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
(3) Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence.
Substantial part of investigation is over. Nothing is to be recovered
or discovered from the applicant. He therefore submits that,
considering the nature of the offence, the applicants may be
enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
(4) Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant
is very much involved in the present offence and considering the
Page 1 of 5
R/CR.MA/16153/2026 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2026
gravity of offence, application does not deserve any consideration.
(5) While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of
the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has
to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having
regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the
following factors are to be taken into consideration while
considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and
the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials
relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of
tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of
the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence;
(iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the
circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest
of the public or the State and similar other considerations are
required to be considered.
(6) I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following
aspects have been considered:
(1) The role attributed to the applicant is that he had received
four boxes of IMFL worth Rs.15,70,393/- and while
loading the boxes in Swift Car the police came and he fled
away from the spot.;
(2) Substantial part of investigation is over;
(3) Applicant is behind the bar since 23.06.2026;
(4) There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the
applicant;
(5) There is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future.
(6) Offence is triable by JMFC Court.;
(7) The applicant has no past antecedents.;
(8) Co-accused having similarly situated role is enlarged on
Page 2 of 5
R/CR.MA/16153/2026 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2026
regular bail and therefore, on the ground of parity also
(Rameshbhai Batubhai Dhabi Vs. State of Gujarat
reported in 2011 (3) GLR 1999), present application
deserves consideration.
(7) This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by
the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central
Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as
in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public
Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in
(1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time
and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to
pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is
exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed
under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application
deserves consideration.
(8) In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the
nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR,
without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is
of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and
enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application
is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No.11204021260281 of 2026
registered with Dakor Police Station, District - Kheda on
executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five
Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he
shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police
investigation and shall not to play mischief with the
Page 3 of 5
R/CR.MA/16153/2026 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2026
evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a
week;
(d) not to leave State of Gujarat without prior permission of
the Trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in
a week till filing of the chargesheet and after filing of the
chargesheet, mark presence before the concerned police
station once in a month for a period of six months;
(f) furnish the Aadhar card, email ID/present address of his
residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court
at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change
the residence, contact number and SIM Card without prior
permission of Trial Court;
(g) if the applicant is found to be indulged in any illegal
activities in future, the trial Court concerned will be free to
issue warrant and cancel the bail granted to the applicant.
(9) The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of
any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge
concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in
the matter.
(10) Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction
to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete,
modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with
law.
(11) At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage
made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
Page 4 of 5
R/CR.MA/16153/2026 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2026
(12) Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ANKIT JANSARI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE ONE, at High Court of Gujarat on 15/07/2026 14:38:44
Page 5 of 5
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "regular bail"Sign in to search