GORDHANBHAI @JADIYO PRABHATJI THAKOR (NAME AS PER SESSIONS COURTs ORDER AND CHARGESHEET)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/17075/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
            AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 17075 of 2026
==========================================================
 GORDHANBHAI @JADIYO PRABHATJI THAKOR (NAME AS PER SSIONS
            COURTs ORDER AND CHARGESHEET) & ANR.
                              Versus
                        STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SAJID Y KARIYANIYA(9619) for the applicants(s) No. 1,2
MR JAY MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 29/07/2026
                                   ORDER

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No.11192050260472 of 2026 registered with
Sanand Police Station, Ahmedabad Rural for the offences punishable
under Sections 108, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”).

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that
applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the offence and
now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore
submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicants may be
enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present
application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.




                                   Page 1 of 4
      R/CR.MA/17075/2026                                ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026




[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:
(1)       It is the case of prosecution that the deceased used to tease the
          daughter of accused No.1 keeping grudge of which accused No.1
          threatened the deceased with dire consequences and present
          applicantss and accused No.4 in abetment of accused No.1 made an
          assault to the deceased with kick and fist blows and thereafter,
          settlement took place however, due to fear of accused persons,
          deceased committed suicide. The said incident took place on
          14.05.2026 however, the complaint is filed belatedly on 25.05.2026
          however, now the investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed;

(2)       Applicants are behind the bars since 26.05.2026;

(4)       There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicants;

(5)       The applicants are not having any past antecedent;




                                    Page 2 of 4
      R/CR.MA/17075/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026




(6)            Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take some
               time.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicants in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicants on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicants are ordered to be
released          on   regular   bail   in   connection    with   FIR    being         C.R.
No.11192050260472 of 2026 registered with Sanand Police Station,
Ahmedabad Rural on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty-five Thousand only) each with ONE SURETY of the like amount to
the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that they
shall;
         (a)      not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

         (b)      not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
                  shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall
                  not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be
                  collected by the police;

         (c)      surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

      (d)         not leave the territory of State of Gujarat without prior
                  permission of the Trial Court concerned;


                                         Page 3 of 4
     R/CR.MA/17075/2026                                                           ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026




      (e)       mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a
                month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00
                p.m.;

      (f)       furnish the copy of Aadhaar card, email ID/contact number /
                permanent and present address of their residence to the
                Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of
                execution of the bond and shall not change the residence and
                contact number/SIM card without prior permission of Trial
                Court;

      (g)       not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
                Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicants.


[9.0] The authorities will release the applicants only if they are not
required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach
of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned
will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

[10.0]             Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete,
modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

[11.0]             At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by
this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

[12.0]             Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.



                                                                       (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)
Ajay
 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
 Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 29/07/2026 14:53:26




                                                   Page 4 of 4