SAHIL @ MISTRI S/O AKBAR BABUBHAI GHANCHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/17705/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
               CHARGESHEET) NO. 17705 of 2026

==========================================================
              SAHIL @ MISTRI S/O AKBAR BABUBHAI GHANCHI
                                 Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
RAFIK LOKHANDWALA(5590) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
TAHIR M SOLANKI(9018) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR K K BHATT(12899) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS PALAK G JADEJA(11163) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                              Date : 13/08/2026

                                   ORDER


[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State and
Ms. Jadej, learned counsel waives for the complainant.

[2.0] The present application is 'led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11191038260404 of 2026 registered
with Vatva Police Station, Ahmedabad City, for the o5ences under
Sections 109(1), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the o5ence.
Substantial part of investigation is over. Nothing is required to be recovered
or discovered. The applicant has no past antecedent. He is not named in the
FIR. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o5ence, the
applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State and learned
counsel for the complainant have opposed the present application and
requested to dismiss the present application. Therefore, present application


                                   Page 1 of 4
    R/CR.MA/17705/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




does not deserve consideration. A<davit 'led by the complainant opposing
bail application is taken on record.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged o5ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:

       (1)     Substantial part of investigation is over;
       (2)     Applicant is behind the bar since 01.06.2026;
       (3)     There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the
               applicant;
       (4)     No past antecedent;
       (5)     Injured is out of danger and discharged from the hospital;
       (6)     Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take
               its own time.
       (7)     Allegation against the applicant is that, he has facilitated the
               main accused to restrict if someone comes to rescue the
               victim. He has not inEicted any blow.




                                     Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/17705/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a
't case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11191038260404 of 2026 registered with Vatva Police Station,
Ahmedabad City, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty-'ve Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he/she shall;

   (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
           shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not
           to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected
           by the police;
   (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
   (d)     not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial
           Court concerned;
   (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a week
           till 'ling of the chargesheet and after 'ling of the chargesheet,



                                    Page 3 of 4
        R/CR.MA/17705/2026                                                        ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026




                 mark presence before the concerned police station once in a
                 month for a period of six months; ;
       (f)       furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his
                 residence to the Investigating O<cer and also to the Court at the
                 time of execution of the bond and shall not change the
                 residence/contact number without prior permission of Trial
                 Court;
       (g)       not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
                 Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant.


   [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
   connection with any other o5ence for the time being. If breach of any of the
   above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
   issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

   [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to
   try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
   and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

   [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be inEuenced by the observations
   of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
   while enlarging the applicant on bail.

   [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
   permitted.




                                                                           (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
   SUCHIT




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/08/2026 18:37:02
                                                     Page 4 of 4