Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

DEEPAKBHAI SATYANARAYANBHAI SOMANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court refused to grant temporary bail, finding the applicant's abscondence and conduct warranted denial.

Summary

The applicant, Deepakbhai Satyanarayanbhai Somani, filed a temporary bail application. The court noted that he had absconded for 593 days and was only apprehended on 9 March 2024. His conduct while in jail was also reported as unsatisfactory. Considering these factors, the court exercised its discretion against granting bail. Consequently, the application for temporary bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether temporary bail should be granted to an accused who has absconded for an extended period and has poor jail conduct

Subjects

temporary bailabscondencejail conductdiscretioncriminal procedure

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/3264/2026                                                             ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




               IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 3264 of
                            2026

==========================================================
                      DEEPAKBHAI SATYANARAYANBHAI SOMANI
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
        DESAI

                                             Date : 10/02/2026

                                                ORAL ORDER

1. The Applicant has                             led this Application for grant of
    temporary                bail        on       the        ground             mentioned                in      the
    application.


2. Heard learned APP Mr.Rohan Raval for the respondent
    State.


3. On perusing the jail remarks, it is re&ected that the
    applicant has absconded for 593 days and came to be
    apprehended by the police only on 09.03.2024. His jail
    conduct also appears to be not good.


4. Considering the same, this Court is not inclined to
    exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant.                                                         The
    Application is rejected.


                                                            (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANKIT SHAH

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT PRADIPKUMAR SHAH(HC01063), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:08:00

                                                     Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.