Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHIVRAJSINH BHUPENDRASINH ZHALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
44-PARTLY ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

Temporary bail was granted for seven days with a Rs.25,000 personal bond and surety, without reduction of the bond amount and with no further extensions permitted.

Summary

The petitioner, Shivrajsinh Bhupendrasinh Zhala, applied for temporary bail for 30 days, citing the need to be present for his wife's orthopedic surgery scheduled on 13‑02‑2026. The court noted that a prior temporary bail of three days had been granted but the surgery could not be performed then. Medical evidence confirming the surgery and required hospitalization was submitted. The court partially allowed the application, granting bail from 12‑02‑2026 to 19‑02‑2026 on condition of a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with an equal surety and compliance with any jail‑authority conditions. The court refused any reduction of the bond amount and barred any further extensions of the bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether temporary bail should be granted on the ground of a medical emergency affecting the applicant's family member
  • Whether the amount of personal bond and surety can be reduced

Subjects

temporary bailmedical emergencypersonal bondGujarat High Courtcriminal miscellaneous application

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/3302/2026                           ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 3302 of
                            2026

==========================================================
                     SHIVRAJSINH BHUPENDRASINH ZHALA
                                   Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR AMIT D SHAH(11232) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                             Date : 10/02/2026

                               ORAL ORDER

1.     This application is preferred by the Applicant for
temporary bail for a period of 30 days on the ground
mentioned in the application.

2.     Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and
learned APP for the Respondent - State.

3.     RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice Rule
on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.     Learned advocate for the applicant Mr.Amit Shah
has placed on record the medical certi&cate issued by the
Orthopedic Hospital, from wherein it is re)ected that the
applicant’s wife is to be operated on 13.02.2026 and will
have to remain as an indoor patient for &ve days.
Previously also, the coordinate bench had granted 3 days
of temporary bail for the same reasons, however, learned


                                 Page 1 of 2
      R/CR.MA/3302/2026                                                             ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




advocate for the applicant submits that at that time,
surgeory could not be done.                                       Hence, he has prayed to
allow this application.

5.        In view of such facts, the present application is
partly allowed. The Applicant is ordered to be released
on temporary bail from 12.02.2026 to 19.02.2026 on the
Applicant’s furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25000/- with
a surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the
concerned authority and on such conditions which the jail
authorities deem it &t to impose. The Applicant at the
time of surrendering before the concerned jail authority
upon completion of temporary bail period, shall submit
the medical case papers of his wife’s surgery, which is
scheduled during the period of his release.

6.        This         Court           shall         not        entertain              application                 for
reduction of amount of personal bond and surety.

7.        The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. It
is hereby clari&ed that no further extension shall be
granted. Rule is made absolute accordingly.                                                                 Direct
service today is permitted.




                                                             (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANKIT SHAH


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT PRADIPKUMAR SHAH(HC01063), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:09:17




                                                     Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.