Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SURAJ MOHAN GAUDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Mr. Hardik H. Dave, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking consent quashing. He later moved the court to withdraw the application. The court, after hearing counsel Ms. Shradhdha C. Pipalia for the applicant, granted permission to withdraw. The application was consequently disposed of as withdrawn. The court expressly noted that it did not examine the merits of the underlying case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of a pending criminal miscellaneous application for consent quashing

Subjects

consent quashingwithdrawal of applicationcriminal miscellaneous applicationcourt order

Judgment

       R/CR.MA/5538/2026                                                     ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 5538
                            of 2026
 ==========================================================
                                     SURAJ MOHAN GAUD
                                            Versus
                                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 MS SHRADHDHA C PIPALIA for MR HARDIK H DAVE(6295) for the
 applicant(s) no. 1
 MS KRINA CALLA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 ==========================================================
    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

                                           Date : 25/03/2026
                                            ORAL ORDER


 1.        Learned advocate Ms. Shradhdha C. Pipalia for Mr. Hardik

 Dave, learned advocate appearing for the applicant seeks

 permission to withdraw the present application.


 2.        Permission as prayed for is granted. The application

 stands disposed of as withdrawn.


 3.        It is, however, clari(ed that this Court has not gone into

 the merits of the case.


                                                                                  (VIMAL K. VYAS, J)
 DEEPAK GEHLOT

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: DEEPAK GEHLOT(HC02361), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/03/2026 16:47:35




                                                  Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "consent quashing"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.