Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KISHOREBHAI JAMATMAL RAMCHANDANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The revision is allowed and the order of the Family Judge dated 28‑02‑2019 is quashed and set aside.

Summary

Kishorebhai Jamamtal Ramchandani filed a criminal revision seeking to quash an order dated 28‑02‑2019 of the Family Judge, Vadodara, which had partly allowed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the CrPC. While the revision was pending, the dispute was referred to the Vadodara Mediation Centre, which facilitated a settlement requiring the applicant to pay Rs 4,50,000 as compensation. The applicant complied by paying Rs 1,00,000 on 15‑04‑2024 and Rs 3,50,000 on 20‑11‑2024. The High Court, noting full compliance with the settlement terms, allowed the revision, quashed the impugned order, and directed the record to be sent back to the lower court, vacating any interim relief. The decision underscores that a settlement under Section 125, once fulfilled, can justify setting aside earlier maintenance orders.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of a settlement, approved by the Mediation Centre, on an earlier order granting maintenance under Section 125 CrPC?
  • Whether a criminal revision under the CrPC is maintainable to quash the Family Judge’s order after settlement compliance.

Legislation cited

Subjects

MaintenanceSection 125 CrPCCriminal RevisionMediationSettlementFamily CourtQuash Order

Judgment

     R/CR.RA/401/2019                              JUDGMENT DATED: 23/03/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO.
                      401 of 2019


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

============================================
       Approved for Reporting Yes    No

============================================
              KISHOREBHAI JAMATMAL RAMCHANDANI
                               Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
============================================
Appearance:
MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MIHIR H PATHAK(5261) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
============================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 23/03/2026

                                 JUDGMENT


1)       By way of present criminal revision application the applicant has

         sought relief to quash and set aside the order dated 28.02.2019, in

         Criminal Misc. Application No.908 of 2015, passed by the learned

         Family Judge, Vadodara, whereby, the learned Family Judge has

         been pleased to partly allow the said application filed by the

         respondent nos.2 and 3 herein under Section 125 of the Code of

         Criminal Procedure (which shall hereinafter be referred to as “the

         Code” for short).




                                   Page 1 of 2
      R/CR.RA/401/2019                                                              JUDGMENT DATED: 23/03/2026




2)         During the pendency of the present revision application the matter

           was referred to the Mediation Centre, Vadodara and accordingly,

           the Secretary, District Legal Service Authority, Vadodara, has

           submitted a report dated 09.04.2024 qua settlement as per which

           the matter is settled on the condition to pay Rs.4,50,000/- as

           compensation and the said amount is already paid by the applicant

           i.e. Rs.1,00,000/- paid through cheque bearing No.088020, of State

           Bank of India, Vadodara, dated 15.04.2024 and Rs.3,50,000/- paid

           through cheque bearing No.088021, of State Bank of India,

           Vadodara, dated 20.11.2024.

3)         In view of above, since the applicant has complied with the terms

           and conditions of the settlement, the present revision application

           stands allowed. The impugned order dated 28.02.2019, in

           Criminal Misc. Application No.908 of 2015, passed by the learned

           Family Judge, Vadodara, is hereby quashed and set aside.


4)         Record and proceedings, if any, be sent back to the concerned

           Court forthwith. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                              (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ANKIT JANSARI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 23/03/2026 18:22:20




                                                        Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Maintenance"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.