High Court of Gujarat

JITENDRABHAI NATWARLAL JANIversusVIPULBHAI RAMESHCHANDRA KANSARA

Disposal: 40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
Bench: HASMUKH D SUTHAR

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the revision application and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant filed a criminal revision application challenging a conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision application. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the Court allow the withdrawal. The Court, exercising its discretion, granted the request and ordered the application to be disposed of as withdrawn, expressly noting that it did not examine the merits of the underlying conviction. Consequently, the revision proceedings were terminated without any substantive adjudication on the issues raised.

Issues considered

Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a criminal revision application pending before it

Legislation cited

Negotiable Instruments Act

Subjects

revisionwithdrawalcriminal procedureNegotiable Instruments Actcourt discretion

Judgment

       R/CR.RA/666/2017                                                        ORDER DATED: 10/03/2026




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
   R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
         NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 666 of 2017
==========================================================
                 JITENDRABHAI NATWARLAL JANI
                               Versus
           VIPULBHAI RAMESHCHANDRA KANSARA & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SR YADAV(2395) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DEVESH A BHATT(1697) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                          Date : 10/03/2026
                                           ORAL ORDER


         Learned advocate appearing for the applicant seeks
permission to withdraw the present application.

         Permission as prayed for is granted. Present application is
disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is hereby discharged. It is made
clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the case.



                                                                  (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

Ajay
  Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
  Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/03/2026 15:54:21




                                                  Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "revision"Sign in to search