Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SUBHASHBHAI KALUBHAI NISRATAversusANKULKUMAR MANUBHAI PATEL

Disposal
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Holding

The appeal is dismissed on the ground of the smallness of the amount, without deciding any substantive issue.

Summary

The First Appeal No. 1781 of 2021 was filed by Subhashbhai Kalubhai Nisarata & ors against Ankulkumar Manubhai Patel & ors concerning a compensation award of Rs.5,00,000 arising from a road accident. The respondents contended that the quantum of the award was small and there was no dispute over the accident, therefore the appeal should not be heard on merits. Justice Mool Chand Tyagi agreed and dismissed the appeal solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount, emphasizing the need to avoid physical and financial hardship to the original claimants. The order expressly states that this dismissal is not to be treated as precedent and directs the release of the award amount to the claimants after verification. The appellant was informed that the appeal could be revived if any difficulty is encountered.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal for a compensation award of Rs.5,00,000 should be entertained despite the small quantum of the amount?
  • Whether dismissal on the ground of smallness of amount constitutes a decision on merits?

Subjects

appealsmallness of amountroad accidentcompensationprocedural dismissalprecedent

Judgment

       C/FA/1781/2021                                   ORDER DATED: 02/04/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                     R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1781 of 2021
==========================================================
                   SUBHASHBHAI KALUBHAI NISRATA & ORS.
                                 Versus
                    ANKULKUMAR MANUBHAI PATEL & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 2,3
MS DISHA N NANAVATY(2957) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

                                   Date : 02/04/2026

                                    ORAL ORDER
        Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.

        Learned advocate for the respondents pointed out that
the captioned appeal may not deserve the consideration on
merits owing to the smallness of the amount awarded to the
claimant/s. It is noticed that the disputed amount involved in
the present appeal is Rs.5,00,000/-. This is a small and
meager amount and considering the aspect of having no
dispute in regards to the road accident, I am of the opinion
that    this     appeal       may    not     deserve    consideration,        more
particularly,           on   the    ground      of   smallness     of    amount.
Accordingly, present first appeal stands dismissed.


        In view of the order passed in main appeal, connected
application, if any, stands disposed of, accordingly.


        It is made clear that present first appeal is dismissed on
account of smallness of the amount and the order passed by


                                       Page 1 of 2
         C/FA/1781/2021                                                         ORDER DATED: 02/04/2026




this Court shall not be treated as precedent so as to say that
this Court has decided any issue on merit. The whole purpose
to dismiss the appeal on account of smallness of amount is
with a view to avoid hardship both physically and financially on
the part of the original claimant/s to appear and defend the
case.


          Therefore, this order shall not be cited as precedent in
any pending matters before any Court in the State of Gujarat.


          If any amount of compensation, or any statutory amount,
lying deposited with the Registry of this Court shall be
transmitted to the learned Tribunal concerned.


          R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court
immediately.                 The entire award amount be disbursed and
released in favour of claimant/s after due verification by
transferring said amount/s to the account/s of claimant/s by
RTGS or NEFT.


          The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal in case of
difficulty.




                                                                             (MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J)
GIRISH



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR GIRISH KANTILAL(HC00954), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/04/2026 11:47:51




                                                    Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.