Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

DIVISIONAL CONTROLLERversusPRATAPSINH MERUBHAI PARMAR

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Holding

The appeal is dismissed on account of the smallness of the amount awarded.

Summary

The Divisional Controller appealed against an award of Rs. 4,98,000/- granted to the claimants in a road accident case. The learned Tribunal had awarded interest at 9% per annum and proportionate costs. The appellant argued that the appeal should not be entertained due to the modest quantum of the award. The High Court held that the appeal could be dismissed solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount, emphasizing that the order would not set a precedent and was intended to avoid hardship to the claimant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, the award was to be released to the claimants, and the appellant was permitted to revive the appeal if necessary.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal may be dismissed solely on the ground of the smallness of the award amount without addressing the merits.

Subjects

appealsmallness of amountcompensation awardroad accidentHigh Court of Gujaratprecedentdismissal

Judgment

    C/FA/2279/2016                                 JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2279 of 2016


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

==========================================================

           Approved for Reporting                  Yes            No
                                                              ✔
==========================================================
                           DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER
                                    Versus
                     PRATAPSINH MERUBHAI PARMAR & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR HARDIK C RAWAL(719) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
DELETED for the Defendant(s) No. 3,4
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Defendant(s) No. 6
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Defendant(s) No. 6
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,5
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                               Date : 25/02/2026

                                 JUDGMENT

   1. Heard learned advocate for the respective parties.



   2. Learned advocate for the respondent/s pointed out that

       the captioned appeal may not deserve the consideration on

       merits owing to the smallness of the amount awarded to

       the claimant/s. It is noticed that the learned Tribunal has



                                   Page 1 of 3
C/FA/2279/2016                               JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   awarded amount of Rs. 4,98,000/- as compensation at the

   rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition

   till    realization   of   awarded       amount,       along       with

   proportionate costs, from the opponents. This is a small

   and meager amount and considering the aspect of having

   no dispute in regards to the road accident, I am of the

   opinion that this appeal may not deserve consideration,

   more particularly, on the ground of smallness of amount.

   Accordingly, present first appeal stands dismissed.



3. It is made clear that the present first appeal is dismissed

   on account of smallness of the amount and the order

   passed by this Court shall not be treated as precedent so

   as to say that this Court has decided any issue on merit.

   The whole purpose to dismiss the appeal on account of

   smallness of amount is with a view to avoid hardship both

   physically and financially on the part of the original

   claimant to appear and defend the case.



4. Therefore, this order shall not be cited as precedent in any

   pending matters before any Court in the State of Gujarat.




                              Page 2 of 3
     C/FA/2279/2016                                                JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   5. R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court

         immediately. The entire award amount be disbursed and

         released in favour of claimant/s after due verification by

         transferring said amount/s to the account/s of claimant/s

         by RTGS or NEFT.



   6. The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal in case of

         difficulty.




                                                                             (J. L. ODEDRA, J)
SUDHIR




                                                    Page 3 of 3
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SUDHIR ACHUTHAN EZHUTHASSAN(HC00192), GOV, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/03/2026 18:34:00


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.