High Court of Gujarat
RAJENDRASINGH CHANDRASINGH KHERversusHASMUKHBHAI MULJIBHAI PANCHAL
- Disposal
- 43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
- Bench
- MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Rajendrasinh Chandrasinh Kher, failed to appear for the second session of the fourth round of the appeal. Consequently, the High Court of Gujarat dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. The order was pronounced by Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar on 23 January 2026.
Subjects
appealwant of prosecutioncivil procedure
Judgment
C/FA/4086/2023 ORDER DATED: 23/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4086 of 2023
==========================================================
RAJENDRASINGH CHANDRASINGH KHER
Versus
HASMUKHBHAI MULJIBHAI PANCHAL & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
RAHUL S SHAH(9701) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MS AMI N BHATT(3372) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1
UNSERVED EXPIRED (R) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 23/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
Even in the second session at fourth round, none appears
for the appellant.
The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ALI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ISTAYAK ALI(HC01093), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 23/01/2026 16:59:50
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "appeal"Sign in to search