Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SANTKRUPA CORPORATIONversusDENA BANK

Disposal
43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
Bench
C DOSHI

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution, with liberty to file a revival application.

Summary

The appellants filed a first appeal (C/FA/4968/2008) in the Gujarat High Court in 2008. Notices were served to some appellants, but they failed to appear, and notices could not be served to others because they resided outside Gujarat. No legal representation was present for any of the appellants at the time of hearing. The Court held that the appeal could not proceed due to non‑prosecution and ordered its dismissal, while granting the appellants liberty to file a revival application if they face difficulty. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was discontinued and the accompanying civil application was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural consequence when appellants fail to appear and cannot be served with notice?

Subjects

procedural lawdismissal for non‑prosecutionservice of noticerevival applicationcivil appealhigh court order

Judgment

     C/FA/4968/2008                                     ORDER DATED: 10/07/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4968 of 2008

                                     With
                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 of 2008
                      In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4968 of 2008
==========================================================
                      SANTKRUPA CORPORATION & ORS.
                                 Versus
                            DENA BANK & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for the Appellant(s) No. 3.1
ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED for the Appellant(s) No.
1,2.1,2.2,2.3,2.4,4,5
DECEASED LITIGANT THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS/ REPRESTENTATIVES
for the Appellant(s) No. 2,3
MR PRANAV G DESAI(290) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                               Date : 10/07/2026

                                    ORDER


      Notice to some of the appellants is served but they did not
appear and Notice to some of the appellants is not served on the
ground that they are living outside the State of Gujarat. The
present appeal is of the year 2008. None is representing the
appellants as of now.

      As a result, the present appeal stands dismissed for non-
prosecution with a liberty to file the revival application, in case of
difficulty.    Interim     relief   granted       earlier,   if   any,      stands
discontinued. Record and proceeding is ordered to be sent back.




                                    Page 1 of 2
           C/FA/4968/2008                                                   ORDER DATED: 10/07/2026




            In view of the above order, the present civil application
  does not survive and therefore, stands disposed of.



                                                                                         (J. C. DOSHI,J)
  PARMAR KRISH


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR KRISH(HC02348), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/07/2026 17:00:32




                                                   Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "procedural law"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.