Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKALABHAI HASANBHAI THAKOR [DELETD]

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Holding

The appeal is dismissed on account of the smallness of the amount, without deciding any substantive issue on merits.

Summary

The appellant New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against a tribunal award of Rs. 1,74,468 as compensation for a road accident. The learned Tribunal had awarded interest at 9% per annum and proportionate costs. The High Court, after hearing counsel, dismissed the appeal on the ground that the amount was small and the appeal did not merit consideration on merits. The court emphasized that the dismissal was to avoid physical and financial hardship to the claimant and that the order should not be treated as precedent. The award amount was ordered to be released to the claimant after verification, and the appellant was permitted to revive the appeal if needed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal can be dismissed solely on the basis of the smallness of the award amount
  • Whether such dismissal creates a binding precedent

Subjects

appealsmallness of amountcivil procedurecompensationroad accidentprecedentdismissal

Judgment

    C/FA/533/2015                              JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                    R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 533 of 2015


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

==========================================================

          Approved for Reporting               Yes            No
                                                          ✔
==========================================================
                   NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
                               Versus
             KALABHAI HASANBHAI THAKOR [DELETD] & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
DELETED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,3,5
MR HARDIK C RAWAL(719) for the Defendant(s) No. 4
MR R.K.MANSURI(3205) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Defendant(s) No. 6
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                           Date : 25/02/2026

                             JUDGMENT

  1. Heard learned advocate for the respective parties.



  2. Learned advocate for the respondent/s pointed out that

      the captioned appeal may not deserve the consideration on

      merits owing to the smallness of the amount awarded to

      the claimant/s. It is noticed that the learned Tribunal has


                               Page 1 of 3
 C/FA/533/2015                                JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   awarded amount of Rs. 1,74,468/- as compensation at the

   rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition

   till     realization   of   awarded       amount,       along       with

   proportionate costs, from the opponents. This is a small

   and meager amount and considering the aspect of having

   no dispute in regards to the road accident, I am of the

   opinion that this appeal may not deserve consideration,

   more particularly, on the ground of smallness of amount.

   Accordingly, present first appeal stands dismissed.



3. It is made clear that the present first appeal is dismissed

   on account of smallness of the amount and the order

   passed by this Court shall not be treated as precedent so

   as to say that this Court has decided any issue on merit.

   The whole purpose to dismiss the appeal on account of

   smallness of amount is with a view to avoid hardship both

   physically and financially on the part of the original

   claimant to appear and defend the case.



4. Therefore, this order shall not be cited as precedent in any

   pending matters before any Court in the State of Gujarat.




                               Page 2 of 3
     C/FA/533/2015                                               JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   5. R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court

         immediately. The entire award amount be disbursed and

         released in favour of claimant/s after due verification by

         transferring said amount/s to the account/s of claimant/s

         by RTGS or NEFT.



   6. The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal in case of

         difficulty.




                                                                            (J. L. ODEDRA, J)
SUDHIR




                                            Page 3 of 3

     Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
     Digitally signed by: SUDHIR ACHUTHAN EZHUTHASSAN(HC00192), GOV, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/03/2026 18:41:10


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.