Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusSADRUDDIN MAGANLAL NARSANDANI

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Holding

The appeal is dismissed solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount, without deciding any substantive issue on merit.

Summary

New India Assurance Co. Ltd filed a first appeal against Sadurdin Maganlal Narsandani & Ors. seeking a claim of Rs. 4,34,000 arising from a road accident. The High Court observed that the amount was small and that there was no dispute over the accident itself. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of the smallness of the amount, expressly stating that no substantive merits were decided and the order should not be treated as precedent. The Court directed the lower tribunal to verify and disburse the full claim amount to the claimant, after deducting any unpaid court fees. The appellant was allowed to revive the appeal if any difficulty arises, and any connected applications were disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate basis for dismissing an appeal when the claim amount is relatively small?
  • Whether dismissal on the ground of smallness of amount precludes consideration of the merits of the case?

Subjects

appealsmallness of amountinsurance claimdismissalprecedenttribunal payment

Judgment

    C/FA/7/2015                              JUDGMENT DATED: 08/01/2026




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                   R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 7 of 2015

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA
==========================================================
          Approved for Reporting             Yes           No

==========================================================
                  NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD
                             Versus
             SADRUDDIN MAGANLAL NARSANDANI & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
DELETED for the Defendant(s) No. 2.5,2.6
MR MAKBUL I MANSURI(2694) for the Defendant(s) No.
2.1,2.2,2.3,2.4
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                         Date : 08/01/2026

                         ORAL JUDGMENT
  1. Heard learned advocate Ms.Mausami Nanavati on behalf of

     Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati, learned advocate appearing for

     appellant no.1.

  2. What could be noticed that the insurance company claimed

     the amount is Rs. 4,34,000/-. This is a small and meager

     amount and considering the aspect of having no dispute in

     regards to the road accident, I am of the opinion that this

     appeal may not deserve consideration, more particularly,

     on the ground of smallness of amount. Accordingly,



                               Page 1 of 2
          C/FA/7/2015                                                            JUDGMENT DATED: 08/01/2026




           present first appeal stands dismissed.

      3. It is made clear that present first appeal is dismissed on

           account of smallness of the amount and the order passed

           by this Court shall not be treated as precedent so as to say

           that this Court has decided any issue on merit. The whole

           purpose to dismiss the appeal on account of smallness of

           amount is with a view to avoid hardship both physically

           and financially on the part of the original claimant to

           appear and defend the case. Therefore, this order shall not

           be cited as precedent in any pending matters arising from

           same accident before any Court.

      4. R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court

           immediately. The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal

           in case of difficulty. Consequently connected application/s,

           if any, also stands disposed of.

      5. The learned Tribunal is directed to disburse the entire

           amount to the claimant after due and proper verification.

           While making the payment, the Tribunal shall deduct the

           court-fees, if not paid, in accordance with rules/law.



                                                                                           (J. L. ODEDRA, J)
 JIGAR J RABARI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: JIGAR RABARI(HCD0067), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/01/2026 11:53:07

                                                        Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.