Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

KAPURTHALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PUNJABversusLAND ACQUISITION TRIBUNAL, KAPURTHALA AND ORS.

Citation
1995 INSC 655
Decided
31 October 1995
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The Tribunal did not commit any error of law in determining the compensation; the uniform rate of Rs 540 per marla was upheld.

Summary

The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 was invoked to acquire 124 kanals 3 marlas of land in Kapurthala for Development Scheme No. 2. The Collector, in his award dated 12 October 1976, divided the land into three belts (A, B, C) and fixed compensation at Rs 300, Rs 360 and Rs 210 per marla respectively. On reference under Section 18, the Land Acquisition Tribunal awarded a uniform compensation of Rs 540 per marla, disregarding the Collector’s belting. The Kapurthala Improvement Trust challenged this uniform rate, while the land‑owners sought higher compensation; both sets of writ petitions were dismissed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court. On appeal by special leave, the Supreme Court examined the development plan, noting that the land lay in a developed, road‑bounded triangular area, and held that the Tribunal had not erred in law in fixing a uniform market rate. Consequently, the appeals of both the Trust and the claimants were dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Land Acquisition Tribunal erred in awarding a uniform compensation rate contrary to the Collector’s classification of land into three belts with different rates under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922.

Legislation cited

Subjects

land acquisitioncompensationuniform ratebeltingPunjab Town Improvement ActLand Acquisition TribunalSupreme Courtappealspecial leave

Judgment

A          KAPURTHALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PUNJAB
                              v.
       LAND ACQUISITION TRIBUNAL, KAPURTHALA AND ORS.

                                 OCTOBER 31, 1995

B                  fK. RAMASWAMY AND B.N. KIRPAL, .JJ.]

            The Pu11jab Tow11 Improvement Act, 1922/Land Acquisition Act, 1892:

            S.36/Ss.4, l1 a11d J/f-Tow11 Improvement Scheme-Acquisition of
C land-Compe11satio11-Belting of la11d by Collector and award of compe11sa-
    tio11 be/twise-Tribu11a/ awardi11g compensatio11 at u11ifonn rate-Held,
    T1ibunal did 11ot commit any ennr of law in detennining the compensation.

           Certain lands of the land-owners were acquired under the Punjab
    Town Improvement Act, 1922. The Collector classified the lands into three
D   belts and awarded compensation at different rates for different belts. On
    reference, the Tribunal awarded compensation at uniform rate of Rs. 540
    per Marla. The Town Improvement Trust filed a writ petition before the
    High Court challenging the award of compensation at uniform rate by the
    Tribunal; whereas the land-owners filed writ petitions claiming enhance-
    ment of compensation. The High Court dismissed all the writ petitions.
E   Aggrieved, the Trust as well as the land-owners filed the appeals by special
    leave.

            Dismissing all the appeals, this Court

            HELD : The plan indicates that the lands are situated in a developed
F area bounded by roads on all the three sides. The Tribunal had not
    committed any error of law in determining the compensation for the
    acquired land. [613-E]

            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1986 of
    1992.
G
         From the Judgment and Order dated 23.2.82 of the Punjab &
    Haryana High Court in C.W. No. 5120 of 1981.

            With C.A. Nos. 3055/82, 3040/84 and 10188 of 1983.

H           S.K Mehta and G.K. Bansal (NP) for the appellant for Kapurthala
                                      612
       KAPURTHALA IMPROVEMENT'ffiUSTv. LAND ACQN_ TRBL                  613

Improvement Trust, Punjab.                                                     A
       Vinoo Bhagat, (NP) and Vimal Dave, for the Respondents_

       The following Order of the Court was delivered :

       Notification under Section 36 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act,       B
1922 was published on September 14, 1975 acquiring an extent of 124
kanals 3 marlas of the land in Kapurthala Town for Kapurthala Develop--
men! Scheme No. 2. Notification under Section 42 of the Act was published
on August 6, 1976. The Collector in his award dated October 12, 1976
classified the lands into three belts 'A', 'B' and 'C' and granted compensa-
tion @ Rs. 300, Rs 360 and Rs. 210 per maria respectively. On reference        C
under Section 18, the Tribunal by its award dated April 16, 1981 awarded
uniform rate of compensation at Rs. 540 per maria. When writ petitions
came to be filled under Article 226, the Division Bench of the High Court
by its common order on February 23, 1982 dismissed them. Thus these.
appeals by special leave.                                                      D
       Shri S.K. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the Kapurthala Im-
provement Trust, contended that having rejected all the sale transactions,
the Tribunal was not justified in awarding uniform market rate since the
Collector made belting and that different rates were awarded by the
Collector. We have seen the plan which would indicate that the lands are       E
situated in a triangle bounded by roads on all the three sides. The lands
are situated in developed area. In our considered opinion, the Tribunal had
not committed any error of law in determining the compensation for the
acquired land. Therefore, the appeals of the Improvement Trust as well as
of the claimant~ for further enhancement stand <lisn1isscd. No costs.

R.P.                                                    Appeals dismissed.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "land acquisition"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.