M/S. O.N.G.C. LTD.versusCOMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI
- Citation
- 2007 INSC 800
- Decided
- 1 August 2007
- Disposal
- Disposed off
- Bench
- S B SINHA
Holding
The appellant is entitled to interest on the refunded amount at a rate of 6% per annum under the principle of restitution.
Summary
MIS O.N.G.C. Ltd., a public sector undertaking, paid customs duty on services obtained from Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc. and claimed exemption, but assessment proceeded and was later set aside by the Supreme Court. During the pendency of the appeals, Rs 54,72,87,536 was realized as customs duty and interest, which was subsequently refunded to the appellant. The appellant filed an application seeking interest on the amount deposited, arguing that equity and the principle of restitution entitled it to such interest, preferably at 12% per annum. The respondent contended that no interest should be payable as the government had expended the amount for public welfare. The Court held that, in principle and equity, the appellant is entitled to interest on the deposited amount under the principle of restitution, but, given that the amount had already been refunded, the appropriate rate is 6% per annum. Consequently, the respondent was directed to pay interest of Rs 9,51,21,999.50 within six weeks, and the application was disposed of without costs.
Issues considered
- Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the amount deposited under the principle of restitution.
- What rate of interest is applicable to the refunded customs duty amount.
Subjects
Judgment
MIS. O.N.G.C. LTD. A
v.
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI
AUGUST l, 2007
[S.B. SINHA AND MARKANDEY KA TJU, JJ.] B
Interest-Claimed on the amount realised as customs duty which was
ultimately refunded to assessee-:-Held: In principle as also in equity, assessee
is entitled to interest on the amount deposited on application of principle C
of restitution-Having regard to the fact that the amount paid by assessee
has already been refunded, the amount deposited fly assessee shall carry
interest @ 6% per annum-Principle of restitution-Customs duty-Interest
on-Equity.
Pure Helium India (P) Ltd v. Oil & Natural Gas Commission, (2003) 8 D
SCC 593 and Mcdermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd & Ors.,
(2006) 6 SCALE 220, relied on.
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd v. State of MP. and Ors., (2003) 8 SCC
648, referred to.
E
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION
I.A. No. 4
IN
Civil Appeal No. 1882 of2004. F
From the final Order Nos. C-IV32-19/WZV/2003 dated 09.12.2003 in
Appeal No. 51/2002 passed by the customs, Excise and Service Tax Appell
ate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai
WITH G
-·
I.A. No. 4 in Civil Appeal No. 854 of 2005.
743 H I
744 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2007) 8 S.C.R.
A S. Ganesh, Shiv Praksah Pandey, Rekha P~ndey and Raj Kumar Tanwar,
for the Appeallant.
Raj iv Dutta, M.F. Humayunisa, Subha Rao and B. Krishna Prasad for the
Respondent.
B The Order of the Court was delivered by
ORDER
S.B. SINHA, J. Appellant is a public _sector undertaking wholly owned
and controlled by the Central Government. It obtained the services of Mis.
C SEDCO Forex Int. Drilling Inc. for obtaining requisite information which would
assist it in the matter of exploration· of oil and gas. The information so
gathered was recorded in 3-D Seismic Tapes. On the amount paid therefor,
custom duty was sought to be levied .. An exemption was claimed by the
appellant from payment of custom duty in terms of an exemption notification
issued by the Central Government in that behalf. As despite such claim,
D assessment proceedings were initiated and completed, the matter came upto
this Court and by a judgment and order dated 24.08.2006,,c011tention of the
appellant was accepted by this Court and the orders of assessment were set
aside.
During pendancy of the Civil Appeals before this Court, a sum of Rs.
E
54, 72,87,536.00 was realised by way of custom duties and interest thereon, etc.
as per the following details:
"(i) 14.09.2004 Rs. 25,00,00,000.00 adjusted towards duty
(ii) 30.03.2004 Rs. 17,72,87,536.00 appropriated towards
F interest
(iii) . 24,02.2005 Rs. 12,00,00,000.00 adjusted towards
interest
Total Rs. 54,72,87,536.00"
G An application has now been filed for a direction to the respondent to
pay interest on the said sum with effect from the date of recovery till the date
of the appellant.
Mr. S. Ganesh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
H Appellant, would submit that keeping in vidw the fact that the appellant had
1
I
O.N.G.C. LTD. v. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI [S.B. SINHA, J.] 745
- to deposit a huge amount during pendency of the Civil Appeals, interest of
justice would be met if this Court directs the respondent to pay interest at
the rate of 12% per annum on the said amount. It was submitted that interest
A
should be directed to be paid by way of restitution, as has been held by this
Co~rt in South Eastern Coalfields ltd v. State ofMP. and Ors., [2003] 8 SCC
648.
B
Mr. Rajiv Dutta, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent, on the other hand, would submit that the Central Government did
not make any investment of the amount received by it by way of ir<lirect tax
but expended the same for the welfare of the people and, thus, no interest
should be directed to be paid in the instant case. C
Appellant is a public sector undertaking. Respondent is the Central
Government. We agree that in principle as also in equity the appellant is
I
entitled to interest on the amount deposited on application of principle of
restitution. In the facts and circumstances of this case and particularly having
regard to the fact that the amount paid by the appellant has already been D
refunded, we direct that the amount deposited by the appellant shall carry
interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Reference in this connection may be
made to Pure Helium India (P) ltd v. Oil & Natural Gas Commission, [2003]
8. SCC 593 and Mcdermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd &
Ors., (2006) 6 SCALE 220.
E
Respondent, therefore, is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 9,5 l,21;999.50/-
by way of interest. Such amount should be paid within a period of six weeks
from date. The application is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
RP. Interlocutary application disposed of.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.