Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

JITUBHAI CHHANABHAI BERADIYAversusBHAVNABEN GOSWAMI , CHIEF OFFICER

Disposal
36-MCA DISPOSED OF

Holding

The applications were dismissed as not pressed, directing the petitioners to seek appropriate relief in the correct forum.

Summary

The petitioners filed a series of miscellaneous civil applications and letters patent appeals before the Gujarat High Court. The court, without examining the merits, directed that the applications should not be pressed at this stage so that the petitioners could file appropriate applications in the correct forum. Consequently, the applications were disposed of as not pressed. No substantive issues were addressed, and the order was purely procedural. The judgment reflects the court’s emphasis on proper jurisdiction and procedural compliance before proceeding with substantive adjudication.

Issues considered

  • Whether the pending miscellaneous civil applications and letters patent appeals should be pressed at this stage
  • Whether the appropriate forum and procedural requirements have been satisfied for the applications

Subjects

contemptprocedural lawjurisdictionletters patent appealmiscellaneous civil application

Judgment

    C/MCA/963/2025                           ORDER DATED: 27/02/2026




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
   R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONTEMPT) NO. 963 of 2025
             In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL/1427/2024
            In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/7089/2022
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1296 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1426 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1297 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1487 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1303 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1494 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1304 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1445 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2562 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1446 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2566 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1396 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2570 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1444 of 2024
                               With
            R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1464 of 2025
                                In
           R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1488 of 2024
================================================================
                       HARIBHAI BATUKBHAI RATHOD
                                  Versus
                     HASMUKHBHAI PRAGJIBHAI BORAD
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DIVYESH SEJPAL(1322) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DEEPAK P SANCHELA(2696) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
MS KRISHNA DESAI, AGP IN MCA/1296/2025 AND MCA/1297/2025
MS VAISHNAVI VERMA, AGP IN MCA/1303/2025 AND MCA/1304/2025
MS SHRUTI DHRUVE, AGP IN MCA/2562/2025 AND MCA/2566/2025
MS SHRUNJAL SHAH, AGP IN MCA/2570/2025 AND MCA/1464/2025
================================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
       and
       HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA


                               Page 1 of 2
      C/MCA/963/2025                                                    ORDER DATED: 27/02/2026




                                        Date : 27/02/2026

                                          ORAL ORDER

           (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)




        Learned             advocates              for       the       applicants,              under
instructions, do not press these applications at this stage
so as to enable the applicants to prefer appropriate
applications              in      accordance                 with        law        before           the
appropriate forum.


        Without entering into the merits of the matter, the
applications are disposed of as not pressed at this stage.




                                                                       (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)




                                                                                (L. S. PIRZADA, J)
STANCY GOMES



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: STANCY GOMES(HC02364), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/03/2026 12:30:56




                                               Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "contempt"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.