Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

JAYMIN N. SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court restored the civil application conditionally, directing the petitioners to deposit Rs.1,000 with the Advocate Law Library.

Summary

The petitioners, led by Mr. J.V. Japee, applied for the restoration of their civil application (F/Civil Application No.32613 of 2025) which had been previously closed due to office objections. Their counsel, Ms. Nidhi Mehta, offered to address the objections and requested a chance for restoration. The State of Gujarat, represented by Mr. Siddharth Rami, opposed the request. The Court, after hearing both sides and considering the assurance given by the petitioners' counsel, decided to allow the restoration on the condition that a sum of Rs.1,000 be deposited with the Gujarat High Court Advocate Law Library within one week. Accordingly, the civil application was restored to its original file subject to compliance with the monetary condition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil application closed on account of office objections can be restored.
  • Whether imposing a condition of depositing Rs.1,000 with the Advocate Law Library is a valid exercise of the Court's discretion.

Subjects

restoration of suitcivil procedurecourt feesconditional orderHigh Court of Gujarat

Judgment

     C/MCA/535/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RESTORATION) NO. 535
                         of 2026
           In F/CIVIL APPLICATION/32613/2025
       In F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION/32612/2025
      In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/17666/2011

=============================================
                          JAYMIN N. SHAH & ORS.
                                  Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT
=============================================
Appearance:
MS NIDHI MEHTA FOR MR JV JAPEE(358) for the Applicant(s) No.
1,2,3,4,5,6
MR SIDDHARTH RAMI, AGP for Respondent State
=============================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                               Date : 12/03/2026
                                ORAL ORDER
1.    Heard           Ms.Nidhi     Mehta,          learned      advocate           for
Mr.J.V.Japee, learned advocate for the applicants – original
petitioners.

2.    Learned advocate Ms.Mehta would submit that one
opportunity       may     be     given    to      the   applicants       and       she
undertakes to remove office objections.


3.    Having heard learned advocate for the applicants and
considering the averments made in the application as well as
assurance given by learned advocate for the applicants, the
present application deserves to be allowed, on the condition
that Rs.1,000/- will be deposited by the learned advocate for
the applicants with the Gujarat High Court Advocate Law
Library.



                                    Page 1 of 2
           C/MCA/535/2026                                                                ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




  4.         On such condition, this application is allowed in terms of
  paragraph 6(b). F/Civil Application No.32613 of 2025 is
  restored back on its original file, on the condition that the
  learned advocate for the applicants shall deposit a sum of
  Rs.1,000/- with the Gujarat High Court Advocate Law Library
  within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this
  order.



                                                                                 (MAULIK J. SHELAT, J)
  GAURAV J THAKER
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAURAVKUMAR JANARDANBHAI THAKER(HC00951), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/03/2026 14:20:42




                                                           Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "restoration of suit"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.