R. MANJULAversusV. RAJA
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 47
- Decided
- 20 January 2009
- Disposal
- Disposed off
- Bench
- ARIJIT PASAYAT
Holding
The transfer petition is disposed of as the parties have settled the dispute and further continuation of the original suit is unnecessary.
Summary
The wife filed a transfer petition seeking to move a matrimonial suit (H.M.P. No. 289 of 2005) from the Civil Court in Nasik, Maharashtra, to the Family Court in Vellore, Tamil Nadu. The Supreme Court directed the parties to appear before the Vellore District Mediation Centre. After several mediation sessions, the parties submitted a joint compromise memo expressing their willingness to live together with their children in Vellore. The Mediation Centre reported that the parties were now cohabiting, and the counsel filed the same compromise memo. In view of this settlement, the Court held that continuation of the original suit was unnecessary and disposed of the transfer petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a transfer petition should be entertained when the parties have settled the dispute through mediation.
- Whether the original matrimonial proceeding can be closed upon a joint compromise and settlement.
Subjects
Judgment
[2009) 1 S.C.R. 421
l
R. MANJULA A
.. v.
V. RAJA
(Transfer Petition (C) No. 458 of 2007)
JANUARY 20, 2009
B
[DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND ASOK KUMAR
GANGULY, JJ.]
Matrimonial dispute - Transfer Petition - Wife seeking
transfer of case from Nasik (Maharashtra) to Vellur c
(Tamilnadu) - Parties directed to appear before Mediation
Centre, Vellur - Thereafter filing a joint compromise memo
that the parties willing to live together along with their children
at Vellur - Proceedings closed - Transfer Petition disposed
~ of accordingly. D
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition (C) No.
458 of 2007.
B. Sridhar, for the Petitioner.
E
G. Sivabalamurugan, Y. Arunagiri and L.K. Pandey, for the
Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. This transfer petition has been F
filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of H.M.P. No.289
of 2005 titled V. Raja v. R. Manjula pending in the Court of
learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nasik, Maharashtra.
Prayer is to transfer the case to Family Court at Vellur District,
Tamil Nadu. During the pendency of the matter, a Bench of this G
Court directed the parties to appear before the District
Mediation Centre, Vellore to explore the possibility of setting
the disputes. By report dated 4.11.2008 the Mediation Centre
has reported as follows:
421 H
422 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009) 1 S.C.R.
A "The parties have appeared and advises given.
Parties given time to think and decide. Parties filed joint
compromise memo. Joint compromise memo recorded.
The Mediation Centre has successfully conducted enquiry
as per the directions of Honourable Supreme court Legal
B Services Committee. Parties are now living together after
compromise efforts.
This information submitted to Honourable Supreme
Court Legal Services Committee."
C 2. Learned counsel for the parties has also filed a joint
compromise memo which reads as follows:
'We both appeared before Vellore District Mediation
Centre, Vellore (Tamil Nadu State) for five dates (i.e.) on
D 17.10.2008, 31.10.2008, 7.11.2008 14.11.2008 and
28.11.2008. We both were advised by Honourable
committee Members. Sufficient time was granted to think
and decide the issue. After consultation of our elders and
as per benevolent advice of Mediation Centre we are
· whole heartedly willing to live together along with our
E
children at our native village, Arcot, Vellore District in Tamil
Nadu."
3. In view of the aforesaid happy situation, nothing needs
to be done in these proceedings except to direct that further
· F continuance of H.M.P. No.289 of 2005 is not necessary. The
proceedings stand closed.
4. The transfer petition is accordingly disposed of.
G.N. Transfer petition disposed of.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.